Archive for 2010

Dr. Lillian Glass 2010 Ten Top Favorite and Inspiring Gifts

Monday, December 27th, 2010

With  Christmas over and the New Year approaching, it is time for me to look back on this year and to reflect on what were some of my best gifts. These best  gifts  are  my happiest  moments for which I am so grateful. As you will see from my list, the gifts of communication, being able to express myself, and being proactive, are some of the most important gifts for which I am grateful. Here is my list for 2010:

 1. The gift of Truth and Justice and the knowledge that  the American Justice system works as I  won a copyright infringement trial against Marsha Petrie Sue who not only copied my materials word for word but who also had the audacity to call her 2007 book Toxic People, the same name as my 1995 book Toxic People.  It was the best gift in the world to see that people like her cannot get away with this and that they must be held accountable for their actions and that everyone must know it.

2.  The next gift was  the enormous outpouring of the  public response, support  and touching comments of how I inspired so many people by going the distance and  fighting for my rights against people like Marsha Petrie Sue who take what you created and claim it as their own and how it inspired them to fight for their rights as well. The gift of their beautiful words are forever in my heart .

  3. The   powerful and healing words Eric Bjorgum,  my wonderful intellectual property attorney so  eloquently spoke in the US Federal courtroom is another gift I will carry with me forever.

 4. The gift of seeing how many people have already been impacted by reading my TOXIC MEN book is also a huge gift to me. The moving feedback of so many readers along with the support of Patti Stanger, BRAVO’s Millionaire Matchmaker, Dr. Laura,  Dr. Robi Ludwig,  and  Robin Sax, and of course  SNOOKI have meant so much to me.

 5.The gift of working with Nancy Grace and being a regular contributor  to her HLN show as well as to her Swift Justice Show. Being around Nancy  Grace, a woman with a mission who’s dedication to justice and to helping crime victims continues to inspire me.

6.  The gift of working with Adams Media and F and S Publications and  in particular the  wonderful people who have been so supportive of me and  my books and allowing me the forum to express myself so that I can get my message across to others.

 7.The gift of being able to regularly  express my thoughts and share my knowledge throughout the media from having my own body language column in Cosmopolitan Magazine to appearing  as a resident body language expert on such shows as  Millionaire Matchmaker and Dr. Phil as well as other television, radio , magazine, and internet outlets on a regular basis. I count my blessing daily.

 8. The gift of giving back is one of the things for which I am most grateful. Every week my family members and I travel around town to find those in need and provide them with a few things which can make their lives a little easier on the streets , from fresh warm blankets, to warm socks,  and tee shirts and sweats . Seeing bright eyes and smiles on faces that haven’t smiled for a long  time,  makes life worth living and is the best gift I can ever receive.

 9. The gift of new friends who seem like old friends ( ie.  Michael, Cat, Deborah,  Ree, Lois, Art, Jim, Steve,) and my old friends who have been renewed ( ie. Jan and Dave,  Reba, Martha, Elis, Chopsey, David,  Bob and  Stacy,  Susan, Shar , Ilsa, Robert, Teri, Nancy,  Donna , Jennifer,  Gloria, Rolanda, Carrie,  Mark, Bob, Phyllis, Suzy  Connie, Chris, Donna, Katiem Kerry,  Janet Victor David W, Motty, Shadoe, Brian, John, Gail)    and to FB for now allowing me to keep in touch.  I am grateful for all of my FB friends and friends on Twitter and most of all my very close and special  friends who add to the beauty of my life.

 10.And last but not least I am grateful for the gifts that my beautiful family has given me throughout my life and continues to give me- their  integrity, honesty, sincerity, continued love and support which I truly cherish.

www.drlillianglass.com


    Share on Facebook

    Marsha Petrie Sue’s Copyright Infringement of Dr. Lillian Glass’ Book Reported By CNBC, USA Today, Bloomberg Businessweek, Yahoo, Breitbart, FOX, ABC, NBC, and CBS

    Thursday, December 16th, 2010

     

    THE MEDIA HAS SPOKEN

    The most powerful media venues such as CNBC, USA Today, Bloomberg  Businessweek, Breitbart, Yahoo, FOX, CBS, NBC and ABC are among the many places which  have reported the trial where  Marsha Petrie Sue,  an Arizona Speaker and author was found liable for copyright infringement by a unanimous jury in a Federal Court in Los Angeles.

     CNBC
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LFu8H8wBnMYJ:classic.cnbc.com/id/40640840+Lillian+Glass+cnbc&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    USA Today
    http://content.usatoday.com/topics/article/Culture/Television/Programming/Dancing+with+the+Stars/02hV4OJeZDa5g/1 

    Bloomberg
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ihUKyA-xncwJ:www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-14/paul-allen-apple-costco-toxic-people-intellectual-property.html+Lillian+Glass+forbes&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    Businessweek
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oDAV-bOqr7YJ:news.businessweek.com/article.asp%3FdocumentKey%3D1376-LDE18E0UQVI901-5CKS40JSI3NJ03FS0BSUSF00UJ+Lillian+Glass+forbes&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a 

    Breitbart
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-jSgmbssbN0J:www.breitbart.com/article.php%3Fid%3Dxprnw.20101213.LA16247%26show_article%3D1+brightbart+Lillian+Glass&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    Yahoo

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20101215/bs_prweb/prweb4899784

                                                                                                                                                           FOX                                                                                                                                                                                                           

                                                               FOX 29 http://www.wflx.com/Global/story.asp?S=13663139   FOX 40http://www.wggb.com/Global/story.asp?S=13663139

                                                                                                                                                                                                               ABC 

                                                                                                                                                       http://www.abc3340.com/Global/story.asp?S=13663139

                                                                                                                                                                                                NBC   

                                                                                                                                                               http://www.nbc29.com/Global/story.asp?S=13663139

                                                                                                                                                                                               YAHOO

                                                                                                                                 http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20101215/bs_prweb/prweb4899784

    In reporting this story,the media has  clearly sent a message that this was  a newsworthy story and  a very important message for everyone to hear. It said that copyright infringement is a serious issue. It spoke of how someone boldly stood up and fought for their rights and took that fight all the way to a United States Federal Court and won. It said that a jury unanimously agreed that Marsha Petrie Sue was a copyright infringer.

      

    A FEDERAL COURT JURY HAS SPOKEN

    The sweetest words to my ears was when the verdict was read. Below are the exact questions  which were read and the exact answers to those important questions- “YES”

      

    A SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT

     It is a very powerful and moving experience to stick up for your rights. Doing so has empowered me. I will carry that for the rest of my life. It was  a very moving experience to sit in a courtroom for three days and watch the American justice system in action.  The system works and I am living proof that it does work.

    Each day I was motivated by the beautiful large American flag that was in front of me in the courtroom. For me, it was the ultimate symbol of truth and justice and the foundation what this wonderful country is based on. Every time I looked at the flag, it gave me hope and courage.

    My intention in going to court was not about the money or to get a windfall. Instead, it was about truth and justice. I felt very strongly about it. I have worked very hard all of my life. I have made a lot of sacrifices in my life and I have never taken the easy road or the simple way out.

    So when I saw someone do word for word copying of my work without giving me proper attribution, refusing to apologize, or to make things right, I had no choice but to exercise my legal rights.

    Marsha Petrie Sue wrote a book in 2007 called ‘Toxic People.’ In that book she had wrongfully copied my material in my ‘He Says She Says’ book which I wrote in 1992.

    The jury of eight unanimously  agreed with  the fact that Petrie Sue did indeed wrongfully copy my material.

    Coincidently, I also wrote a book called ‘Toxic People’ in 1995.  One day while doing a search on Amazon.com, I stumbled across Marsha Petrie Sue’s 2007  book that had the same title as my book, ‘Toxic People.’ That is how I learned that her book contained my material from ‘He Says She Says.’ 

    Needless to say I was shocked. I have written fourteen books and they are my life’s work. My books are filled with a lot of information that have helped a lot of people. The countless phone calls, emails, and letters I have received throughout the years are testimony to that.

     If someone is interested in using some of the materials from  any of my books or blogs for that matter, I have no issue with that. But you must contact me first to get my permission. No one can simply copy my work without giving me or anyone else from whom they copy, proper credit and hope that I won’t find out.

    Marsha Petrie Sue  not only copied my material and placed it in her book, she took my copyrighted material and put it in her website and claimed it as her own. In addition, she stated on her site that she gave  people permission to use my material only if they mentioned her name and gave her credit.

    I NOT ONLY STOOD UP FOR MYSELF  I STOOD UP FOR EVERYONE WHO CREATES ANYTHING!

    I stood up to Marsha Petrie Sue and her behavior and I did it in a Federal Court. I not only stood up to her for myself, I stood up to her on behalf of anyone who creates something.

    Whether you are an author, screenwriter, songwriter, composer, sculptor, artist, illustrator, fashion designer, furniture designer, auto designer, poet, architect, photographer, jewelry designer, shoe designer, or anyone who has developed something from your own creation, you have a right to defend what is rightfully yours.   

    My  legal victory is not just for me. It is for you too. I fought on behalf of you as well. I  kept you in my heart and in my thoughts throughout this entire ordeal.

    It has now been a week since I set foot in Judge R. Gary Klausener’s courtroom and watched him sit high above on his bench in his regal black robe as he ruled on various technical legal matters.

    It has been less than a week since my fabulous intellectual property attorney Eric Bjorgum of Karish and Bjorgum articulated  so eloquently and passionately on my behalf. His wonderful words were healing and will continue to resonate within me for a lifetime.

    This was not an easy task by any means. But it was well worth it. I have come away from this experience more motivated than ever to be a voice for people. I am blessed to now be able to serve as an example to  empower others in letting them know that  they never have to feel victimized  and that they have recourse through the justice system.

    And on a final note, I say God Bless America!” I’m so happy and so proud to live in this wonderful  country where we can send a message about improper copying. www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    DR. LILLIAN GLASS WINS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT TRIAL AGAINST MARSHA PETRIE SUE

    Sunday, December 12th, 2010

      On December 9, 2010, a jury in Los Angeles, California unanimously found in favor of media personality Dr. Lillian Glass in her copyright infringement trial against Marsha Petrie Sue, an author and professional speaker from Arizona.

      In the trial, Dr. Glass had alleged that Petrie Sue’s 2007 book “Toxic People” had wrongfully copied from two lists in Dr. Glass’ 1992 book “He Says, She Says.”  The jury of eight agreed.  

     Dr. Glass had also written a book in 1995 called “Toxic People.”  She stumbled across Petrie Sue’s book of the same title on Amazon.com and learned that it contained material from “He Says, She Says.”

     The author of fourteen books, Dr. Glass said: “I’m so happy, so proud to live in this country where we can send a message about improper copying.  My books are my life’s work.  They are full of  valuable and helpful information. If a person wants to use something, contact me.  But don’t copy my work without giving me credit and hope I won’t find out, because I will stand up to anyone who does this.”

     “I not only fought this legal battle for  myself,” added Dr. Glass,” I fought it on behalf of  everyone who creates something.” 

     Dr. Glass was represented by Karish & Bjorgum, PC in Los Angeles. 

     Late last month, Dr. Lillian Glass released a sequel to her best- selling book “Toxic People” about relationships called “Toxic Men- 10 Ways to Identify, Deal With and Heal From Men Who Make Your Life Miserable” from Adams Media (2010). Dr. Glass is also a regular contributor to the Nancy Grace Show and has a monthly column in Cosmopolitan Magazine.  Her commentary is regularly seen through the news media.

    Share on Facebook

    Kate Gosselin’s Anger, Pettiness, and Signals of Deception on the Today Show As She Discusses Kids Expulsion from School And Blames “The Divorce”

    Saturday, December 11th, 2010

    KATE FILLED WITH ANGER WHICH KIDS MIRROR

    After watching Kate Gosselin’s  latest interview with Meredith Vierra  on the Today Show I saw an angry, bitter, and petty woman who just can’t let go of her hatred towards Jon.

    She is in such denial that she does’nt have any clue that her inner hatred and anger is being mirrored by those kids and literally destroying them. As she took her anger out on Jon and continues to be filled with hatred, her kids are taking their anger and hatred out on the other kids. at school

    They have anger issues because she has anger issues.  It’s not because of the divorce. It is because she is so angry about the divorce and that anger carries over to them.  Lots of kids are products of divorce and they don[t go around beating on and cursing at other kids.

    THE LEG KICK

    Kate began the interview  kicking her legs. When someone kicks their legs when they are about to be interviewed it means they are very uncomfortable and are not looking forward to the interview because they probably will not be forthright with you.

    THE HEAD COCK


    Then in a monotone she says ” We are doing great” as she opens her eyes wide. This eye widening is often a signal of deception. Then she says We are very happy and adds the word “actually, ”When you have to add the word actually” it  most likely  means that things are not actually that great.

    When Kate was asked about whether the  two of the kids were expelled from school she cocks her head to the side. This is  often a signal of deception. She then  speaks in a staccato hyper articulated  speech pattern  saying ” That is false.” When one does that,  it is usually signals deception. Also there was a lot of fidgeting with her hands. This  is another sign of deception.

    Now we hear her convoluted attempts filled with ums. It does not make sense as it is disjointed. She is searching for words as she knows what she is saying is complete spin and nonsense.”

    We have a situation where we my kids um are in an academic situation where academics  um are pushed and I fully support it. Combined with kids who were having to just go through with a divorce. Their parents suffering some of those normal feelings

    When someone speaks in fragments like you see above  they are lying, When they speak in tangents they are lying.

    The telling thing here is her words ” their parents suffering.” It shows just how narcissistic she is.  She doesn’t say the children are suffering but  instead brings it back to herself, saying that she is suffering.

    Then she says and the two collided and they were not doing well  with the combination. What about a simple YES THEY WERE EXPELLED BECAUSE THEY ARE TROUBLED EMOTIONALLY!!


    Body language wise look at Kate’s upturned palm.  What this means is she is begging for  Meredith and the audience to  to believe her roundabout circumvented deceptive  answer.


    Look at Meredith’s facial expression.  It says that she isn;t buying Kate’s nonsense. either.

    KATE’S SELF ABSORPTION AND BRINGING THE TOPIC BACK TO HER DIVORCE

    Kate says I felt so alone, I talked to other moms who had gone through the divorces. This is is NOT about Kate and her divorce.  It is about the kids but she is obviously too self absorbed to see that.


    Then she protests so much as she shakes her head NO,  knowing full well what she is saying is complete BS as she says ’Its  NORMAL Stuff as she shakes her head no.

    Then she suddenly looks down. This is a huge indicator of deception as she says I did what I could do we mutually  agreed. I brought them home with a private tutor

    Then she says  …um um (she smiles as though she remembered to say something she left out as part of her spin)   She says and Early education teacher…

    Kate is speaking in fragments which means she is most likely reciting some rhetoric she was no doubt told to say . She obviously messed up  her lines.’’

    Then she shows just how in denial she is as she recites : It is dealing with  the very normal results of a divorce.”

    WHAt???????? Most kids have parents who get divorced and  d they don’t beat one another and curse them like her kids allegedly  did.  How about admitting that their anger is the result of a hostile hateful and  angry mother whom  they no doubt mirrored. They saw her anger and abuse towards their father almost every  day of their young lives.’

    Kate 7

    Kate obviously knows what she is saying is complete BS. That is why she purses her lips in an attempt to hold back all the BS.

    STILL BITCHING ABOUT JON

    Then Kate Gets bitchy as she has to say how  Good  she is and how BAD  Jon is. She just has to tell one  just how she reached out to him first, and how it depend on the day and the hour , thus giving  him yet another zing . This is a man she not only emotionally   destroyed and emasculated throughout her marriage by hitting him and belittling him, but now  she has removed his voice

    The man isn’t even allowed to go on the airwaves to defend himself or he will get fined and lose what little he does have.

    LEAVE JON ALONE!!!!!!!!

    Why does she have to go there? Why  can’t she leave him be? If he is the father of her kids and always will be as she made sure to say on the show, then she needs to leave him alone and stop trashing him.

    He loves his kids and is the reason they will probably have a chance at life. He has only given them love nd affection.

    Now that he has a beautiful lovely and beautiful woman in his life – Ellen Ross,  those kids will  finally know about a  healthy  male female relationship. They will see a man and a woman who respect one another not a man and a woman who constantly bicker like they saw with Jon and  Kate .

    Then she says And Honestly when I think of the old days I try to email him and write him and give him a call. When someone starts a sentence with Honestly chances are they are not being honest,

    Then Meredith relayed to Kate how  Jon apologized on his twitter account publicly for what he did to Kate. Instead of acting like a mature adult and saying I appreciate it or petty Kate  says she doesn’t consider interviews  and twitters an apology and that she never got a an  apology yet.”

    HOW PETTY!!!!!!!!!

    Kate,  get over it! Talking like that is what will ruin your kids forever. Your pettiness will transfer over to them.

    Then she disgustingly says ” Strangely  and ironically  I have forgiven him..’’

    If you have really  forgiven him then why the shoulder shrugs which indicate deception. Why all the  high drama?  In my view Jon is the one who needs to forgive you for abusing and emotionally torturing him until he went over the edge.

    KATE LEAKS OUT ANGER,  AND MORE  ANGER  !!!!!!!

    Then she leaks out  ” people who are close to me are upset that I don’t get that angry. And who are those people, Steve Neild the bodyguard?

    Then  on the next breath she leaks out  “I am angry,” Then she changes her mind and says   What good does it does it do I don’t have time to waste”


    But her expression and vocal inflection say it all. She scrunched up her face and goes up at the end of the statement as though she is asking a question. She clearly knows she does not believe what she is saying.

    Kate, here is a very valuable message to you. Since the  therapist is  allegedly already  in the house to take care of the two angry home schooled kids, why not have a session with the therapist as well? The therapist can  help you get over your anger towards Jon.’

    Your anger is making the kids angry which is destroying their little lives. Your anger is being mirrored by them in school. You talk about sending them back to school . Well here is a secret. They will never make it back and succeed there unless you get to the root of the problem-your deep rooted anger.

    ADDITIONAL PETTINESS FROM KATE

    Kate haven’t you done enough to punish and destroy Jon? You have silenced the man so he cannot speak up or speak back. You have taken away opportunities for him to make big money on the media and now you are suing him for 125K for child support.

    Please tell  us how this man is supposed to earn a living when you have destroyed his opportunities. Tell us how he is supposed to have a full time job and have no money for nannies and maids and still  take care of the kids when you are out and about?


    JON IS RIGHT!!!! GET THE KIDS OFF THE AIR

    Jon was apparently livid when Kate  left their  kids with a teenage babysitter whom he did not know and  the sitter was instructed by Kate  not to talk with Jon.

    Kate just dismissed these concerns. The fact that two of the children showed behavioral problems would be a red enough flag for any parent to take their kids off the air. Jon has tried.let’s hope that  he succeeds before it is too late.Let’s hope that a disaster can be avoided. . www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    The Real Reason For Casey Anthony’s Laughter and Smiles In The Courtoom- She Was Genuinely Happy for Law Clerk’s Surprise Swearing-In As A Lawyer

    Saturday, December 11th, 2010

    I recently wrote a blog where I, along with countless others who saw Casey Anthony’s recent behavior  in the courtroom felt  shocked  and appalled at Casey’s smiling and laughing behavior.

    But now, an extremely  reliable  source,  who was actually in the courtroom and who had first hand knowledge of the circumstances,  informed  me as to what really happen to cause Casey to smile and laugh at the end of the hearing when Casey’s lead attorney,  Jose Baez left the table.

    Evidently Casey’s laughter and smiling had nothing at all to do with her case or why she was in the courtroom. Instead, it had everything to do with a swearing-in ceremony one of Jose Baez’ law clerks becoming a full-fledged attorney at the end of the hearing.

    Apparently at the end of the hearing lead , attorney Jose Baez surprised his law clerk by having Judge Perry swear the clerk  in at the sidebar. Casey evidently  knew nothing about this until the woman sitting next to her,  who was actually another attorney in Baez’ office,  informed her of what was happening and shared the good news with her.

    Now it makes  complete sense to me.  Quite honesty I was appalled and confused when I suddenly saw Casey’s laughter and genuine  cheek raised smiles. She looked genuinely happy for the first time and I wondered why. What caused her to suddenly change her courtroom demeanor?

    Earlier in that  blog I wrote how impressed I was that Casey was actually paying attention to others who were speaking in the courtroom. She  actually looked at the person and appeared focused. She was not fidgeting or smiling. You can clearly see this in the photo above.

    This was a dramatic transformation from the Casey we first saw two years ago when she first stepped foot into the courtroom. There is no doubt that this was due to the efforts of  her attorney Jose Baez, who finally succeeded in teaching his client proper courtroom behavior, so that she could have every chance to  get a fair trial.

    NEW INSIGHT INTO CASEY

    So when Jose left the table and Casey was left alone with someone else,   I thought she reverted back to her old ways. But evidently she did not. Instead,  she was genuinely interested in another person as you can see by her body language.

    She looked like someone who was genuinely proud of another person. Apparently this  particular law clerk has gone to the bat for Casey and has worked long hard hours helping with her defense for the past two years. She also  knew how hard he worked for his personal goal of becoming a full-fledged attorney. So she was genuinely happy for him and it showed in her body language.

    The body doesn’t lie! Having said that,  it is essential to know in what context the  body language and facial movements are made. In this case had I not been informed of the context that accounted for Casey’s  sudden joy and laughter, when attorney Baez left the table,  I would have assumed that she was not taking her presence in the courtroom seriously.

    But now that I was informed as to the correct context as to what occurred, I can see that Casey’s laughter and smiles were understandable.  It made a lot  more sense to me.

    Her genuine body language with genuine warm  smile  showed that Casey was actually  outside of herself. She was thinking about another person other than herself. This is a very different side of Casey than we have ever seen.

    If she did kill Caylee, too bad she wasn’t thinking of Caylee instead of  herself. If jurors do happen to  see a glimpse of this side of  Casey- a more genuine side and a more human side, they may not look at her as a complete monster  and may  spare her life from lethal injection .

    www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    Dr. Lillian Glass Believes Voice on Audiotape Claiming To Be Britney Spears Saying Boyfriend Beat Her Up May Be Phony

    Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

    Doing vocal forensic analysis as an expert witness in the legal field,  I can assure you that I know a great deal when it comes to the human voice. For over two decades I have send my time working with people who had voice issues. So when I heard  the alleged Britney Spears tape claiming that her boyfriend Jason Trawick  beat her I knew exactly what to listen for.

    WHAT DR. GLASS LISTENED FOR ON THE TAPE

    I knew to listen to all of the elements which make up the tone of a person’s voice. I listened for resonance or nasality, pitch of the voice, quality of the voice, and the loudness of intensity of the tone. I listened for nuances and patterns Britney had in her speaking voice. And finally,I listened for inflection pattern.  Then I analyzed the content of the speech in terms of what was actually said.

    I carefully listened to the alleged  tape in its entirety. Then I carefully  listened to interviews Britney did throughout the years. There was a distinct pattern and a distinct and consistent cadence to Britney’s  voice and speech pattern through the years.

    MY FINDINGS

    DIFFERENCE IN NASALITY AND RESONANCE

    The person on the alleged audiotape had a slightly nasal sounding resonance in her voice. Britney  in all of her interviews does not have this sound.

    DIFFERENCE IN ARTICULATION

    The person on the alleged audiotape slurred her words into one another and had sloppy articulation. The real Britney has precise and crisp articulation.

    The real Britney had clear /s/ sounds that are consistent throughout her speech while the person on he alleged tape has an often  distorted  sounding /s/ sound which sometimes sounds like a slight /sh/ distortion.

    DIFFERENCE IN INFLECTION PATTERN

    The person on the alleged audiotape had a loud bleating monotone.

    The real Britney Is full of dynamic inflection. Her voice sounds interesting and not boring. She goes up and down with her inflection.

    DIFFERENCE IN INTENSITY AND LOUDNESS LEVELS

    The person on the alleged audiotape was loud whereas the real Britney gets softer in her tones whenever she wants to express herself. She gets louder and softer just as she gets higher and lower in pitch to express her points.

    This is not the case with the person on the alleged tape.

    RIDICULOUS  VERBAL CONTENT ON TAPES 1 AND 2

    Finally the content makes no sense and is contrived in am amateurish way.    Jason Alexander her former husband whom she married and quickly unmarried years ago says I thought he proposed to you at the beach.

    A real person would answer No or Yes and then go into an explanation. Instead this alleged person on the audiotape jumps in with “Was that after he beat on me.” It made no sense and sounded very contrived as though someone wanted to get this information out there at all costs.

    Then another example of how contrived the alleged tape sounded was the reference to Britney’s father and his protective nature. We all know that Mr. Spears is Britney’s conservator and he really helped turn her life around.  We also know that he has been overprotective at times and that early on Britney was upset about it.

    So the person on the alleged tape plays to this known fact in referring to what we all know about Briney’s father’s protectiveness , The person does this by saying “My dad has a shotgun and he’s just waiting to use it.”

    .Does the person who made this alleged tape think that the public is that stupid and wouldn’t pick up on what they were obviously trying to do?

    There is no way Mr. Spears would take a shotgun to anyone. He would have too much to lose. If he knew hs precious daughter was being beaten after all that she has been through over the past three years,  he would call the police or get a restraining order . He would do something legally to protect his daughter just like he did when Britney had that nefarious manager Sam around her.He took the law in his handsm not a shotgun.

    He would never risk doing anything to jeopardize his being able to care for Britney and her boys. So what the alleged person on the tapae said, made no logical sense.

    SPEAKING TO  BRITNEY  ABOUT BRITNEY IN THIRD PERSON AS OPPOSED TO FIRST PERSON

    .Another giveaway that it was bogus was when Jason Alexander is sating My mom said Britney was engaged..  If you are talking TO Britney  you would say My mom says YOU were engaged,  not BITNEY was engaged. But if you were talking o someone other than the real Britney you would invoke Britney’s name. That was certainly the case here.

    Then out of nowhere  the person on the alleged tape says it’s true he did that but it’s not true that I accepted it. WHAT????????? This is so contrived; It is clearly someone trying to manipulate the conversation. When someone discusses what is TRUE and NOT TRUE when truth and non truth is not even in question, you can be sure that what the person is saying is NOT TRUE!!!!

    MORE BOGUS DIALOGUE

    JA: I mean, but why ain’t he in jail baby?

    Alleged BS : Because I didn’t want the public knowing about it and I didn’t want to file anything, so everybody could find out. So I’ve just left him and changed my number.

    JA: So, y’all ain’t no hanging out no more?

    Alleged  Britney : No we’re not.

    JA: Y’all ain’t even talking?

    WHAT???????????? A person who was not manipulating a tape would say, Are you OK or how are you doing or how do you feel about not being with him anymore but to say So yall aint no hangng out no more is ridiculous.  The alleged Britney  told him she was allegedly beaten and his nonchalant reply is whether or not they are hanging out, pr talking is completely  is ridiculous. Whether a person who has allegedly beaten up on a person is still taking to them is absurd.

    Also his tone is very monotone and nonchalant  as well. If you find out your friend was beaten you show a little more emotion in your voice unless it is contrived.

    MAKING  SURE THE DIRT IS  OUT THERE

    ,
    Alleged  BS: No, but I am going to tell you right now, I found out and um, it’ll probably be in a magazine in a couple of weeks… I found out from Larry (Rudolph) – he told me that my dad is going to fire him because he found out that he had pictures of us, like, personal pictures for the paparazzi and he plans on selling them and acting like we are still together so that he can get money of it. So my manager, Adam, is probably going to release a statement, probably on Wednesday, saying that the pictures are going to come out and s—.

    SIGNALS OF DECEPTION

    The above statement is full of signals of deception from  the no but to the um I am going to tell you right now. When someone is telling you the truth they don’t say that they are going to tell you something, They simply tell it to you. Also,  the last thing Britney cares about is whether oe not something is in a magazine. She has PR people who orchestrate her press which leads me to question whether Jason Alexander got some money  for selling these what I hear as BOGUS tapes in different magazines for some quick cash.

    To me in all my years of watching scandals and what is and is not   real it sure sounds like a set up to me. It does not seem real. There is way too much information in this statement. There is too much detail for Britney to get into in terms of the photos, This leads me to question whether Jason is behind this photo deal.

    Once again the alleged Britney evokes her father’s name as the conservator It seems very contrived to me.

    THE HUGE SLIP UP-PAPARAZZI !!!!!!

    After hearing the alleged Britney discuss the  Paparazzi and sayhe had pictures of us, like, personal pictures for the paparazzi and he plans on selling them and acting like we are still together so that he can get money of it. nothing can convince me that this is not a complete FAKE

    First of all Britney would know that  personal pictures are NOT given to the PAPARAZZI.  What would you want a middle man when you could go to the source like a photo agency or to the magazine itself. So this is fake as the real  Britney knows the drill. Also Paparazzi don;t  accept and sell  photos  you already have. They have no rights to any photos they do did not take themselves.  There s no money in that for them. They take photos so they can sell them to agencies or to magazines directly.

    And finally the reason I know it is fake is because Jason Trawick is an agent, They make HUGE money. If they don’t bring in HUGE money they get go or FIRED. So I am sure Jason Trawick does NOT need chump change of a making thousands  when he is making millions off of his clients.

    YET ANOTHER REASON TAPE SOUNDS CONTRIVED- JASON TRYING TO MAKE HIMSELF LOOK GOOD

    Did Jason orchestrate this tape?  He certainly built himself up in the tape by coming across as  the alleged Britney savior and acting all macho to help this poor damsel in distress by saying:

    JA: Well, well, do you need me to find this dude and have a conversation with him?

    PUHLEEEEESZZZZZ!!!! This is like a bad  B movie . Who talks like that????  The answer is no one!!!! Does Jason think the other Jason would ever speak to him?? Of course not. Agents don’t even speak to their own clients unless the client is  making big money for them, so how can he think Jason  Trawick would ever give him the time a day?

    Then there is the final goof up that makes no sense as the Alleged Britney  says  I really don’t know who to talk to you about it. WHAT ??????????? It makes no sense. She Britney impersonator obviously flubbed her lines.

    www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    Casey Anthony’s Inappropriate Courtroom Body Language With Smiles and Laughter

    Wednesday, December 1st, 2010
    WHY IS THIS ALLEGED CHILD MURDERER LAUGHING IN THE COURTROOM?

    A while back I wrote in a bog that  I thought attorney  Jose Baez deserved a lot of credit for teaching his client  Casey  Anthony how to properly behave in the courtroom. At that time ,  I noted that her body language was more in control and that a lot of her annoying habits, including the hair grooming, lip pursing. and her annoying smiling behaviors  were gone.

    But they have returned and have become even more pronounced.  They have returned to the point they are extremely disturbing to anyone looking at this woman, who is accused of killing her child. Whether she did or did not kill  little Caylee, no one should be laughing  in a  courtroom under any circumstances.

    STILL HAS THE FLIRTS FOR JOSE

    As soon as she walked in to he courtroom and flashed  her  smile and then cocked her head coquettishly to see her alleged crush Jose, I immediately  knew that Casey as back to her old self.  In fact she is more than her old self. She is her happy and carefree self with the facial expressions we saw in so many of her partying  photos .

    The body does not lie! These series of photos will show you what I mean.  So no matter how you coach someone, who they really are will eventually leak out.  You can’t fool anyone,  especially anyone sitting on a jury for three months.

    What leaked out about Casey is that she is feeling pretty confident as reflected in the way she carried herself and in her body and facial language.  Her walk even had a bounce to it. Her bright smiles on the verge of laughter seemed to indicate that she most likely knew that the defense had something up their sleeve which was in her favor. In fact it appeared  that she was feeling pretty cocky about it.

    The one thing that has come back with even more frequency us her hair grooming tactics.  The second she walked into the courtroom  she had her hand up to her hair to groom herself in preparation for seeing her alleged  crus, Jose  Baez.

    As soon as she sat at the table she hair groomed. As soon as she had to stand up when Judge Perry was to enter the room, she hair groomed.

    Back was the old lip biting and lip fiddling. Maybe she does a lot  more lip and teeth fiddling  since her  famous elevator fall when she accidentally chipped her tooth.

    Hair grooming like seen above continued and continued and continued the entire  time she was seated. This annoying habit reflected her and desire to be viewed  as pretty.

    On a positive note,  she did seem more attentive than usual. She seemed to pay close attention and look in the direction of the person who was speaking . Unlike we have previously  seen,  Casey actually looked genuinely interested in what the person had to say.

    Perhaps hearing anyone speak after being cooped up in a cell all this time  and not being able to speak to anyone gave her a newfound interest  in people other than herself.

    As for her outfit,  we are seeing a fashion  trend  emerge with Casey, “The Casey Anthony Puffed Upper  Sleeve Look.”   It was a look no dount orchastrated by her former death sentence attorney Andrea Lyon. Today  she is wearing the  rauched sleeve version of the puffy  upper sleeve look.

    Usually when we see the  upper sleeve puffed,  it is in clothing worn by children.  If an adult wears this child like costume it tends to subconsciously  give them the  image of being sweet and innocent - like a child.

    This time, Casey  kept her buttons closed at the appropriate places and didn’t go for the sexy cleavage look.

    Casey is still very pretty in many people’s view with her chiseled bone  structure. This  is why I repeatedly say- watch out for  any man  (young or old)  on the jury who loves to help damsels in distress and who may be taken with her looks. Please believe me when I say that her guilt or innocence will be determined by WHO is on that jury and that the defense has the upper hand here.

    They have one of the best jury consultants in the country while the prosecution has no one and they want it that way.

    But Casey  doesn’t always look that pretty,  especially when she does her lip purse and grimace as part of her ritualistic behavior pattern,  which we have often seen in the courtroom.

    Her breathing pattern was more labored than the last time she sat through a hearing. She did a lot of upper chest breathing and letting out  her air while raising her chest. This means that the reality  of the situation periodically hits her as to why she is in the courtroom. The   sudden expulsions of air indicate that she is getting a bit nervous when she has fleeting thoughts of her future.

    Part of her nervousness was  observed in her lip licking. No doubt she was getting a bit cotton mouthed  as her saliva was drying up due to inner tension she may have been experiencing.

    As the attorneys go  up to the bench Casey is left alone with one of Baez assistants, she clearly feels happy to be in the presence of another young woman  who is of similar age  who is not wearing a jail or a jailers uniform.  She smiles contentedly as she writes a note to the woman next to her. It is reminiscent  of what she may have done in jr. high school classes when she wrote notes about the cute guys in the room to her fellow classmates.

    And in true jr. high school fashion, she immediately  folds the note up as she doesn’t want anyone to see what she has written.

    Then after looking at Jose’s assistant, and reading the assistant’s note, she cannot seem to contain her happiness. She immediately turns away from he assistant and  gives a huge smile.

    Why was she smiling? Was it because she was told that Cheney Mason and Jose Baez may have found over a dozen  people who said they didnt see thee bag Caylee was  was stuffed in when they were searching with Equi Search?   Or was she simply  thrilled to  be having have some type of human interaction after being out of her cage? Are her fantasies now in full force?

    Her close lipped smile was all too sickening!  This woman has zero to smile about but that doesn’t stop her. She has a genuine smile with raised cheeks  sans showing her teeth. No doubt, she is still  narcissistically self conscious about the dental repair.

    Still elated and not  trying to not show her teeth, she  cranes her neck to looks over  at the monitor  in front of  Jose’s assistant. What is so funny?  How can this woman be smiling  about anything in the midst of this very serious situation.  For goodness sakes her daughter was killed and she is the prime suspect.

    But Casey cannot contain herself. She is happy and doesn;t care if her teeth are seen outside if her lips. She breaks into a  huge genuine smile with lips parted, teeth showing and eyes wrinkled and cheeks raised The assistant os smiling as well which is equally inappropriate considering this is a courtroom. They are not watching a sitcom for goodness sakes. Jose needs to educate his assistant as to how to act in a courtroom as well.

    This is upsetting. It doesnt  matter why Casey or the assistant are  laughing. What matters is that they are in a court of law and the fact that a baby girl was found with duct tape across her skull and and that skull  which was detached from her body is nothing to laugh about. The fact that Casey may possibly have poison coursing trough her veins until her heart stops  beating and she stops breathing is also no laughing matter.

    But in the other hand, she may feel she does have something to smile about.   The possibility that she may be living a life in prison without parole may very well be a laughing matter to her. She may end up enjoying her life there, manipulating fellow inmates and creating countless  love affairs.  Her ego will no doubt be pumped from all the fan mail she will receive from both  men and women who will have found her not guilty in their views. Others will flatter her ego by tellimng her how beautiful they thing she is.

    Some will send love, prayers, and words of  encouragement  which will  keep her from being bored. Others will send money to allow her to go the canteen and purchase  a pen, paper and candy. She will have a bed to sleep in and three square meals a day, periodic showers, and lots of attention. And the most important thing she will have to smile about is that she doesn’t have to be around her hated parents- especially Cindy. For Casey, that  indeed  a lot to smile about!

    In any event, there is no doubt in my mind that the real Casey will leak out during the three-month trial. You can be sure that no matter what happens, the jurors will not be smiling when they see that leaking Casey .

    www.drlillianglass .com

    Share on Facebook

    Did Ronni Chasen’s Agressive Communication and Body Language Anger Someone Who May Have Murdered Her?

    Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

    The question on most people’s minds in the entertainment industry as well as those who live or work in Beverly Hills is who killed publicist Ronni Chasen and why?  Was she specifically targeted or is everyone in danger in Beverly Hills?

    CRIME LIKE THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN IN BEVERLY HILLS

    In a town where there is little crime and no murders in 2009,  people are very frightened and on edge.  The reason people are so spooked is because there is little to no crime here. That is due to the Beverly Hills Police Department, who is next to none. They are the crème de la crème.

    They watch this town like a hawk with surveillance cars and constant patrolling and monitoring. If they are called for any 911 emergency, they will promptly be at the scene within 60 to 150 seconds. So that is all the more reason people are freaked out by what happened to Ronni Chasen.

    POSSIBLE THEORIES FLOATING AROUND AS TO WHY RONNI WAS MURDERED

    There have been many theories floating around as to the motive of killing Ronni Chasen from

    a) a gang initiation

    b) a professionally jealous colleague jealous of her successful Oscar campaigns

    c) someone whom she leaked bad press about to media outlets that cost them a relationship or a business deal

    d) someone who wanted to stop her from doing her job,  which was to create publicity campaigns in an attempt to persuade the judges of film awards like The Oscars to choose her clients above the rest which would result in big money

    e) gambling debts and refusing to pay up

    f) someone whom she cut off in traffic six minutes before she was killed because she was talking on her cell phone and leaving a “to do list” on the other end while perhaps not paying attention to the road

    g) an art deal gone wrong

    h) a mob killing linked to investors on one of her many movies

    i) a psychopathic serial killer on the loose

    j)        a disgruntled  former client

    k)        a disgruntled  former employee or housekeeper

    j) someone whom she snubbed, disrespected,  humiliated,  belittled or  screamed and yelled at because they didn’t do  what she wanted or do things her way

    PR PRAISES ABOUT RONNI FROM THE TOP OF THE LINE PR PROS

    When it was first in the press that Ronni has been murdered  only her fellow PR colleagues like top of the line veteran PR people like Paul Bloch, Stan Rosenfeld, Howard Bragman, and Michael Levine spoke out and sang her praises in true Hollywood PR fashion.

    They  stated  that she was the sweetest woman alive and that everyone loved her and she had no enemies. Powerful Hollywood journalist Nikki Finke spoke  lovingly and kindly as did other journalists who were interviewed.

    But as the days have passed, while her clients have also  attempted to say positive things   about her in the press, they also  managed to  leaked out another side to Ronni’s persona that may give us some insight into her personality which may have alienated the wrong person.

    THE OTHER SIDE OF RONNI REVEALED BY FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES

    Here are some  other revealing comments and descriptions  from her clients, friends  and colleagues:

    She was persistent” Peter Hamond

    doggedly determined”person Eddie Kalish

    “She was known for her “fast-talking, old school, New York aggressiveness on behalf of her clients and was not a person one quickly forgot after meeting. Peter Goldstein

    Songwriter Diane Warren paints a picture of a publicist who was determined to get what she wanted and who was  ”fiercely protective” of her clients.

    When it came to Ronni getting a photo op with celebrities Diane reported  Ronni said” “(Chasen) goes, ‘I don’t care what I have to do – I’m getting that picture,’ ” Warren explains. “That was Ronni — she had something she wanted to do… and she got that picture.” “She really cared, her clients were like family to her,” says Warren. “She’d tell you what to do and people listened to her.”

    At her funeral service her  turbocharged drive in a segment of the business never known for the faint of heart was mentioned. Eulogists all described Chasen’s forceful personality.

    At the funeral service her close friend Vivian Mayer-Siskind’s seemingly lighthearted comment  about Ronni revealed even more about her and her personality that some would not find so  appealing as she said “Ronni came to me last night and was pissed as hell. ‘Now you get me a free Armani suit.’

    Perhaps the most revealing insight into Ronni Chasen;s personality came from Producer Irwin Winkler of Rocky fame who said that when his 2004 film “De-Lovely” was not nominated for a Golden Globe, Chasen “was furious.”

    “She screamed and yelled at (members of) the Hollywood Foreign Press (Assn.),” the group that puts on the annual awards show, Winkler told The Times.

    While she may have been consistently pleasant to her friends and colleagues  and  described as fiercely protective over her  clients who clearly  paid her large amounts of money, the real question is  how was she to others who were not  A list paying stars or movie studio executives?

    DID SHE YELL AND SCREAM AT THE WRONG PERSON?

    While friends colleague and clients may have appreciated her being pushy and having too much chutzpah,  and sense of entitlement, traits that obviously work in Hollywood,  perhaps there were others who were equally so put off with her  relentless behavior, that they may have found her  to be one of the most Toxic People.

    When someone yells and screams at others like Irwin Winkler  reported Ronni  did to the Hollywood Foreign press because her client didn’t get nominated for an award,  it makes you wonder about who else she yelled at because she didn’t get her way or get what she wanted.

    Did she scream and yell at the wrong person? Did she humiliate them? Did they harbor such ill feelings  towards her and allow them to fester to the point  they wanted her dead? Did they hate her that much that they took their fantasy of wanting her dead and turned  it a reality by driving up to her car  and shooting her five times in the chest?

    SHOOTING SOMEONE 5 TIMES IN THE CHEST SIGNIFIES SEVERE HATRED TOWARDS THE PERSON

    Apparently she had been shot while traveling to her home in Westwood  after attending the premiere of Burlesque, a new film starring Cher, and an after-party at the W hotel. The person or people who shot her obviously had such disdain for her that they shot her in the chest not one time- but five times.

    That screams of hatred and rage. In a random drive by shooting there would usually be one shot. But for someone to keep their finger on the trigger and shoot five times, it means they were  furious with her. They wanted to make sure she was dead!

    While we know that the shooting was from one car to another, as of today there are still no suspects, no motive, no witnesses according to Beverly Hills Police Department Lt. Tony Lee.  So the mystery remains.

    The one thing that gives hope  in solving this tragedy is that the well respected  Beverly Hills Police Department is on top of it and they will leave no stone unturned until the killer or killers of Ronni Chasen  are found.www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    Halle Berry’s Babydaddy Gabriel Aubrey’s Body Language Shows Lack of Chemistry With Kim Kardashian

    Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

    There  is no doubt in my mind that the mastermind manager mom of the Kardashians,  Kris Jenner is behind the setup of her daughter Kim and Halle Berry’s now single and available babydaddy  Gabriel Aubry.

    While  the publicity ploy  did work to bring attention to Kim and keep her daughter in the news, the chemistry between the two seems to be lacking. This is the beginning of their alleged relationship. So one would think there would be a lot more  touchy feely and chemistry going on. But in my view, it is clearly  not there .

    In the photo above Kim looks awkward and insecure around the male model who may equally as beautiful. She has her hands clasped together as though she is holding on to herself for security. Her curved and cupped finders indicate a hiding type of behavior and also reflect her insecurity around Aubrey.  They are also looking in opposite directions which is not a good sign for a couple as it means that they are not like minded.

    He has a half smile which also indicates his discomfort around Kim.

    Here we see Kim’s pursed and pressed together lips which also indicate discomfort. It indicates that she is holding back. She holds on to herself for security once again.Kim does seem to be taken in by Aubry’s beauty as she stares at him. She may even be intimidated by it as she hunches her shoulders and leans forward. This is not the typical self confident posture we are used to seeing with Kim.

    Aubrey looks in the opposite direction and doesn’t respond to her glance or pay that much attention to her as he looks straight ahead.

    He also clasps his hands together for self comfort, Just as Kim does not seem confident around Aubrey, he  doesn’t  seem at ease or comfortable around her.

    There is also a lack of a smile and there is no leaning of their heads together. This indicates a distance between them and that  there is clearly no chemistry between them .

    When a man holds on to himself clasping his arms, he is clearly not that into the other person he is with. There is no smile on his face . He leans forward and in essence is giving Kim the cold shoulder.

    Kim  is  hunched over in an uncharacteristically non confident move. She clasps her hands together for security as she is clearly appears uncomfortable around Aubrey. She has leaned her knee next to him but he is bit reciprocating, They look very awkward together.

    I have to give Kim a lot of credit here as she is trying to engage Aubrey by pointing something of interest out to him. Kim even has a little smile. But there is no smile on Aubrey’s face which  is not a  very good sign.

    Even though Kim is trying to engage him him further by placing her knee next to his knee, it clearly doesn’t interest him as he does not respond.In fact, his leg is pulled away from her.

    His fingers are interlocked in a protective mode with one of his thumbs covering the other. This is a further example of his discomfort level around Kim. His rounded shoulders and lack of smile indicate that he s clearly not to happy about being there. The tension in his forehead shows this.  He feels out of place and it shows.

    This outing continues to not go well as Kim now fiddles with her hair in discomfort  as Aubrey continues to ignore her. Another bad sign is that there is too much distance between them and they are looking in opposite directions.

    This indicates that they are no like-minded. While Kim is leaning into Aubrey, to show a goof  public front of their being a couple, the reality is that   he continues to ignore her and looks straight  ahead. In fact, he begins  to  lean away from her.

    While they both finally have smiles on their faces in this photo, the reason is not because they are happy to be together. It is no doubt because these two are getting paparazzied and they are in their element – in front of  cameras with flashing bulbs.

    When a man walks in front of a woman he is supposed to be dating or with whom he is beginning a relationship, he doe NOT walk in front of her. It is rude and unacceptable. When it happens in Western culture it means that the man is not into the woman. In this photo it means Aubrey is NOT into Kim.

    He clearly does not feel comfortable around Kim as indicated by his hunched  back posture.It shows discomfort and most likely feeling intimidated around her. There is no physical contact as Kin does not reach out to toucvh him. They appear to be  two separate units and not a couple with any heat.

    A MARKED DIFFERENCE FROM HALLE

    After looking at the photos of him with Kim, don’t jump to any conclusion that  that Gabriel Aubrey is a  just a cold fish non emotional aloof kind of guy. He was just the opposite when he was first dating Halle Berry. He was warm and affectionate.

    Unlike his body language around Kim, he was connected and in sync with Halle once upon a time. They were in step as they walked together, Unlike he was around Kim,  he was very attentive to Halle.

    He was like minded with Halle and his smile was very warm and genuine around her. He seemed like a man who was truly happy at the time and truly in love.

    AUBREY MAY STILL BE LONGING FOR HALLE

    Perhaps Gabriel  still has feelings for Halle. After all she is the mother of his child. Perhaps he is still saddened by their breakup. Perhaps he is not ready to date or be out on the town on Kim’s arm.

    It is easy to say that he and Kim are just getting to know one another and may be taking it slow. But if there is no basic chemistry  between the two of them as we saw in the photos  , then things may  not bode well  for a lasting future together. www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook

    Lethal Combination- Toxic Abuser Racist Mel Gibson And Oksana’s Body Language Showing Signals of Deception and Manipulation During Larry King Interview

    Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

    LETHAL COMBINATIONS

    In my new book Toxic Men- 10 Ways to Identify, Deal With and Heal from Men Who Make Your Life Miserable,  I speak of Lethal Combinations.  This is when a certain type of Toxic Man and a Toxic type of Woman get  together to cause a Lethal explosion. We are clearly seeing that explosion in the case of Mel Gibson’s and Oksana Gregorieva’s coupling. The old expression, one man’s trash is another man’s treasure applies here. What is toxic and unbearable to one person may not be toxic to the next.

    From what we have seen no matter how you look at it, Mel Gibson, stands alone as  one of the most Toxic men out there. He is no one’s treasure as far as mostof us are concerned.  Based on what we now know about him, the only thing that someone  could treasure about him  may be the fact that he has a lot of money, a lot of nice material goods, and a lot of connections  that he  has because he can afford to pay big bucks. This includes his high profile  attorneys and pr agents who are defending him and spinning  for him.

    But  in the final analysis no one can spin him. His Control Freak Bullying ways, his sexism (calling a female police officer Sugar Tits and just wanting a woman only  for the purpose of engaging in oral sex with him as we all heard on the infamous tape ) his anti- Semitism and rant against Jews, Blacks ( comparing them to animals in a  pack and using the egregious N word) and rant against Hispanics, stinginess(not wanting to pay the nanny) selfishness, vulgar and disrespectful speech,  complete with name calling and using every expletive to call the mother of his child,  makes him the number one example of a Toxic Man.

    SLAPPING  IS THE SAME AS A HITTING – IT IS PHYSICAL  ABUSE

    His recent self admission that he didn’t beat  or hit  Oksana,  but instead merely” slapped” her, says it all. He just put his final  nail in his coffin in the court of public opinion.

    When a man resorts to hitting a woman, you can’t say anything else other than he is a Toxic abuser. Since Mel admitted that she slapped a woman  Mel Gibson is a Toxic Abuser !

    When we listen to the tape of his wild out of control rant towards Oksana there is nothing more Mel can ever do or say. The die is cast for him as a physical abuser forever and ever.

    DID MEL ABUSE FIRST WIFE ROBIN AND WHAT WAS THEIR RELATIONSHIP LIKE?

    Maybe he was Toxic  to his wife Robyn. Maybe he wasn’t. Only they know for sure.

    We do know that he had a drinking problem when he was married to Robynm whom he married when she was young. We do know that he  also had a cheating problem when he was married to Robyn.

    We don’t know if he yelled at Robyn cursed her, hit her, humiliated her, or caused her to live in fear.

    Maybe she did not bring out the worst  Toxic traits in him. Maybe she brought out the best in him. Maybe she learned  early on in their marriage to turn a blind eye because of a number of reasons.

    Maybe she wanted to keep the family together with all the children she had with Mel. Maybe Mel saw her in a different light because she did not seek the limelight but rather sought only  to be a mother and to  be  a caretaker  for her children and her husband.

    Maybe she never questioned him or demanded anything from him.  SHe cerianly did’t insist that he put up the money for her singing career like Oksana did . Maybe she did everything he said. Maybe she was so compliant that he has no reason to get upset with her or yell at her or hit her.

    Since their marriage lasted for three decades, there is no doubt that something worked in their dynamic. If his toxic traits emerged around him, she no doubt learned to stuff her feelings or deal with the repercussions, in exchange for maintaining her lifestyle and the   cohesiveness of the  family unit she had with him.

    Maybe  without even realizing it, she  used some of the techniques I describe  in my book for those who choose to stay in  a toxic relationship and deal with it.

    Maybe she breathed him out of her system every time he acted toxic.  Maybe she gave him more love and kindness or calmly confronted him or secretly fantasized about pushing him into oncoming traffic on Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu. Whatever she did to cope with his Toxicity evidently worked for her.

    Since I have never met Robyn nor have I ever  seen her and Me together, I can only speculate. But I am certain  that her personality  makeup was not Toxic to Mel. This is  clearly the opposite of Oksana’s personality makeup.She was defiantly Toxic to Mel.

    OKSANA IS EQUALLY AS TOXIC TO MEL AND MAKE A LETHAL COUPLE

    From what we have seen  thus far from Oksana via her verbal and non verbal communicaiton , we see that Mel’s assessment of her may be correct.  She  does appear to be user and a classic manipulator. She loved the limelight as you can see in the photo above , In fact, she may have loved Mel’s  money even more and his connections  even  more than his money, which could  propel her  mediocre  singing talents in my view.

    She apparently knew exactly how to push his buttons with her low, emotionless, hypnotic monotones. It is easy to see how frustrated Mel became around her. When he was clearly upset and she calmly and unemotionally said he is mentally disturbed and needs help, it is easy to see why she brought out the worst in Mel.

    ALL 39 OF OKSAN’S LAWYERS CANT ALL BE WRONG!

    When someone goes through a few attorneys it is understandable. One needs to find one to match one’s  needs and personality.

    You may even need different attorneys to do different things for you. But when attorney after attorney leave you because you are so difficult and won’t listen to them , then it is you who is Toxic.

    When your attorney tells you  not to  sing on Oprah and you don’t listen there is something wrong. When your attorney says no more press and you don’t listen something is very wrong.

    At one time Oksana   had the best attorneys in Los Angeles try to help her , One by one they left her camp. They evidently saw right through her and her toxicity. She had Sorrell Trope- the most respected  attorney in the city to help her.  He was obviously  so fed up with her that he quit.

    She had the former felony prosecutor  Robin Saks trying to help her. I know Robin very well as she is my partner in our new business venture “Courtroom Consultants” where we use our expertise to not only provide jury consulting but media consulting for high profile cases. If she washed her hands of Oksana along with countless other high profile attorneys, something is very wrong Oksana in my view.

    Now Okana  is delegated to attorney Martin Garbus who appeared on Larry King with her as he tried to spin her BS.  I have to say is that no matter how long Mr. Garbus has been doing his job or how much he has spoken publicly on behalf of his clients, he needs to hire Robin Sax and myself and our Courtroom Consultants firm in order to  immediately to help him with his on camera presence.

    He made Oksana look worse than she already looked. He was clearly spinning  and spinning!  There were so many signals of deception on his part  in my view from his shoulder shrugs and his constantly looking down when he spoke. He did not appear  likeable  to me and that says a lot to a jury. And adding insult to injury in my opinion,  was  his lack of  on camera manners sucking a  mint on TV during the interview.   It appeared  rude  and obnoxious and highly unprofessional.

    While it is bad enough to see a client chew gum or suck mints  in and out of  the courtroom,  when a lawyer  does it,  the message it gives is disrespect.

    Not only does her legal mouthpiece show disrespect,  Oksana  too, shows much disrespect by defying a judges orders. I know many judges and I can assure you that it is not a wise decision to defy their orders. The consequences are too great. But Oksana cannot help herself. She is willing to disrespect the court in order to feed her narcissistic need for publicity by appearing on Larry King Live.

    WOMEN’S ABUSE FOUNDATION IS SECONDARY TO OKSANA’S MESSAGE AND PURPOSE

    There was no way in my view that Oksana  was on the show to represent  and promote the women’s abuse foundation. I know this because  she spoke about them in the third person.  She was detached,  She did not speak like a spokesperson. Instead she spoke about herself and she clealry had her own agenda.

    WAS OKSANA MANIPULATING HER INJURIES?

    I have no doubt that Mel slapped her. Ater all,  he admitted it. But did  he slap her with the baby in her arms? I wonder.

    What makes me wonder is  Mel’s response on  the audio tape when she accuses him of doing so.  He just mocks her and says boohoo hoo. I wonder of she spliced that together. While Mel hates Oksana he clearly does not hate the baby and would not hit the baby in my view.

    He would have answered differently like Are you crazy oe how dare you say I hit the baby!  Instead, there is no responsem  just a mocking of Oksana. Did she splice the tape up to suit her needs?

    Now  we see that the baby’s injuries may have  allegedly  been doctored as TMZ  showed  these two  photos of Baby Lucia.

    The photo below shows a pimple like mark on Lucia’s chin. If Mel’s slap continued on and hit  Lucia one would not see a localized pimple like spot. Instae done would see a swelling and brusing.

    WHY IS OKSANA SMILING IN HER  DENTAL PHOTO MINUS VENEERS?

    In addition  we see Oksana smiling as her veneers were allegedly knocked off by Mel.  You see a genuine smile in the photo as her eyes as well,as her  lips show that she is happy.

    Is she happy and smiling because she thinks that this is the money shot which will do Mel in and allow her to collect big bucks?  Was Mel wearing a ring when he allegedly  slapped her in the mouth?  Is that what broke her tooth or did she bite on something hard in a deliberate attempt to crack and chip the veneer?

    Did  she already have a loose veneer that had nothing to do with Mel’s  slap and  and then proceed to   peel it off off by herself ?  Anything is possible!

    The dentist appears to be a reluctant witness and even said he didnt;t see signs of abuse.  He backtraacked initially. If someone hit you hard enough to cause your veneeer to pop off wouldn’t it seem logical that you would also see some soft tissue damage around the lips?

    The fact that she is  smiling is disturbing. Even if the dentist said to smile for the camera to show the alleged damage, her eyes would not be crinking with a smile unless she was happy. Who would be happy if someone knocked off their veneers unless they knew there was some big financial compensation coming up?

    WAS OKSANA’S FACIAL BRUISING  THE RESULT OF RESTALYNE OR BOTOX SHOTS ?

    When I saw the   small bruise on the side of Oksana’s eye to me it  looked like  a small bruise one would get after having a Restylyne  filler  or Botox shot in the area.  There  are also  a cluster of little brown spots  located underneath the eye which also look like they may be filler shots. They do not look like an injury from a battery to me. They would be a lot more severe and not at localized ?

    There would also be alotmore swelling and distorion. The factthat the bruse was still black and blue and purple indicates that it is fresh. so with a frsh bruise you would see more swellingand distortion in my view.

    OKASNA ON  LARRY KING LIVE

    Personally I found the whole Larry King interview to be very manipulative and disturbing . When someone does not look at the host initially  and when they constantly look down,  chances are they are not telling the truth about something.

    This was the case with Oksana. She did not  look at Larry and instead  she consistetly looked down as she spoke. If someone has nothing to hide they look right at you.

    She continued to look down as she said that Mel continued to hit and choke her in front of her son. Personally I seriously dount that happened. He may have very well choked her and hot her but based on her  body language I doubt that he di dit in front of her son.  P erhaps Oksana  coached her son to say this happened when it may not have happened.

    Still looking down which is  another signal of deception Oksana says that Mel brandished a gun! Who uses the word branished? To me. his sounds like a term that she rehearsed with her attorney or she heard her attorney say  in his  argument.  If one was being forthright and sincere and truthful they usually would not use big words or words that you need a dictionary to figure out.  Instead, they would say he pointed a gun at me.

    Personally,  I have a hard time thinking Mel would point a gun at her without pulling the trigger. He may have been furious,  but he is not insane.

    He loves children or he would not have had so many of them. I am sure he loves that  baby and I doubt that he would pull a gun on her while she had the baby in her arms. It just  doesn’t make sense. It seems she is throwing all the accusations up against the wall, no matter how absurd they are in order to see what sticks.

    OKSANA IS BUSTED BY LARRY’S QUESTION ” WHY DIDNT YOU JUST HANG UP?”

    Here is where we really see some signals of deception and some spinning on the part of Oksana’s attorney Garbus. Larry asks her why she just didnt hang  up on Mel. That is a great question!

    Why didnt she just not take his calls. She obviously look his calls because she was recording them.  Look at her hands and her facial expression, She is shocked that Larry asked her this.

    One hand  is cupped and her f ingers  are pinched  together, This indicates anger. The other hand is open and outstretched m  a pleading like motion. What she is doing here in making this gesture is pleading with Larry to be believed.  She  is angry that he brought this up and pleads that he believe her.

    We see her head cocked to the side and her eyes opened wide and an expression of righteous indignation.

    When you see something like this it indicates that she was in essence busted . She was embarrassed that she was caught as you see her deer in the headlights wide eyed expression.

    If someone was harassing you over the phone you would hang up n them and not continue to converse with them or engage them unless you planned to tape them, perhaps doctor the tapes. and release them publicly.

    She says she recorded him because she was   afraid for her life. If that was the case she needed to  hang up and leave his mansion where she was staying rent free and go to a friends home or to a woman’s shelter.

    As Oksana looks on in shock at having no truthful  answer , the question that revealed it was  why didnt you just hang up on him ? Her attorney immediately steps  in a begins his ridiculous spin with mint sloshing in his mouth from side to side. He  bothlooks and sounds ridiculous. He is clearly showing signals of deception as well in my view.

    The

    The lawyers umhs and uhs and shoulder shrugs, and lack of eye contact with the host, his leaning  his  head away are all signals of spin  as well as deception.

    These are just a few examples of deception  but there were so many other signals I observed with regard to Oksana during her interview with Larry King. Her pleading with Larry to help her screamed of manipulation.

    It was like she was pretending to be the poor helpless victim from a far away land who needed someone to save her.

    After defying the judges orders I believe that there is little if anything that can save Oksana or Mel for that matter. He did by his own admission hit a woman and that is a felony offense. She may very well have extorted him as he has accused.

    If they are both found guilty they may both suffer the consequences which may include time behind bars on both of their parts.

    And who is the one who will really suffer in the end? Little Lucia! It is so sad for her. She didn’t ask to be born into this mess and hatefest. Now this is a part of her legacy. Unfortunately she has to grow up with the knowledge  that her parents essentially used her as a pawn when she was an innocent  baby. www.drlillianglass.com

    Categorized in body language, Celebrities and Children | Edit
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Dr.Lillian Glass on Joy Behar Show Discusses Expelled Gosselin Kids And How They Need Help

    November 18, 2010 – 12 Responses

    Click below to see Dr. Glass speaking about the Gosselin children on the Joy Behar Show on HLN

    http://cnn.com/video/?/video/showbiz/2010/11/15/behar.gosselin.kids.panel.hln

    A while back I wrote a blog where I described the behaviors and the body language of  some of the Gosselin children. I observed them on the  Jon and Kate Plus 8 television show. In particular, I found the behavior of little Colin Gosselin disturbing as he appeared to be the one who consistently bullied the other children. He  was often involved in some type of interaction which resulted one of the other children ending up in tears.  He often seemed to be 0ff of his own and appeared to be  disconnected from the others, in my view.Also, he rarely smiled. He  also seemed to be rewarded for his bad behavior by Kate .

    Alexis was described by Kate as being The Wild Child. ” Kate once said  on the show that of all the kids, Alexis  and Colin did not get along at all. This alligator and reptile loving  girl seemed to be loud and out of control throughout the show.

    So it did not surprise me at all when I heard that both Colin and Alexis were in trouble in school. But what did surprise me was that they were expelled. They were not suspended. Instead, they were kicked out and asked never to return. It is a huge deal for a 6 year old to get expelled from school. They must have been so out of control and so difficult to handle that the school  administration had no other choice. They must have been so disrupting and upsetting to the other children that the only solution was to get rid of them.

    Allegedly they cursed up a storm and said words that children of that age should not even know, let alone  say. They also allegedly bullied and taunted other children. In essence, because they were not given boundaries in the home, they acted the same way at school.

    There is no doubt that they emulated Kate’s ugly behavior to Jon. They grew up learning disrespect from their mother and they in turn followed suit and disrespected others. They constantly saw their father being abused and belittled by their mother, that  they now allegedly  abused  and belittled others.

    Instead of getting these children psychological help they apparently need, Kate decided to home school them.

    In essence she is home schooling two children who do not get along with one another. This is a recipe for emotional disaster. These children need to be forced to socialize with others who are not their brothers and sisters. They need to  be in a school in order learn how to get along with others.

    Home schooling is a bad idea for them  for other reasons as well. It can cause problems with them and their other brothers and sisters. They might  be seen as “bad” or  as outcasts who are being punished. This could affect their subsequent relationships with one another.  They might be viewed as lesser than by their fellow siblings.

    NO TO HOME SCHOOLING  IN THE CASE OF ALEXIS AND COLIN !

    Also who is going to home school them? Who is going to be the hands on teacher? Will it be Kate who is never there? Will it be Steve her “bodyguard”? Will it be a private teacher who will be fired at Kate;s whim  if the teacher  doesn’t do what Kate wants? Kate has had a history of going through countless house cleaners and nannies. So what is to say that she won’t go through countless teachers? This could be devastating for the kids.

    I think Alexis and Colin  need to be put int another school right away so they will be forced to  deal with and get along with other children . I also hope that all the other  kids are in different classes with different teachers so that they can have a sense of being an  individual and not a part of a group of brothers and sisters.

    Nothing good is going to come out of  this situation unless Kate gets out of her denial and gets them proper help from proper people which definitely include mental health professionals in my view. Otherwise, things will get worse and worse. If they are this out of control as children one can only imagine  what will they be like when they are teenagers and completely unmanageable.

    PULL THE PLUG ON THE TV

    All of these children need to off  TV in my view. They have enough money. They have a trust fund for their higher education. They need to focus on being kids and  the getting the emotional  help they need that just comes from being sextuplets. They need to learn how to adjust to life as individuals.TV is clearly not working for them at this point in their lives. Someone needs to be responsible and step up to the plate and pull the TV  plug on these kid.

    FATHER DOES KNOW BEST

    Joy  Behar made a joke on the show that Jon was now becoming ” Father Knows Best” . What she was saying was that he seemed to be the only steadying factor for these children. He is the loving and the nurturing of the two parents. He is why I feel there is hope for these kids. Jon now has a lovely woman who is a steady force in his life and in the kid’s lives- Ellen Ross . Now the kids will have  more positive role model. They will be able to see  love and kindness from a man and a woman (Jon and Ellen)  instead of hatred and bickering  (Jon and Kate) .

    I don’t know what Jon and Kate’s  agreement is concerning he children’s educational and medical needs. I don’t know if Kate has all the power to make decisions or they both have equal decision making rights. If he has any say in this he needs to get  ALL of them into therapy asap and he needs to find a different school for Colin and Alexis where they can have a second chance and learn from their actions. www.drlillianglass.com

    Share on Facebook