First and foremost the results of Joran van der Sloot’s psychological tests have been made public. Some of the results reveal that he has a hair trigger temper, doesn’t value women, has many anti social behaviors, can only make superficial relationships, has no empathy and feelings towards others, and is narcissistic .
All of his behaviors scream that he is a Sociopath.
HOW WAS JORAN TRICKED INTO SIGNING A CONFESSION WHEN IT WAS ALL VIDEOTAPED?
Now Joran van der Sloot claims he was tricked into confessing to Stephany Flores’ murder. He says that the Peruvian authorities told him that if he signed the papers they gave him, he would be transferred to the Netherlands.
If what he is saying is true( and I doubt it), then the Peruvians may have given lying Joran a taste of his own medicine.
All he has done over the past 5 years is lie about Natalie Holloway. If they did happen to tell him that he would be deported back to the Netherlands if he signed the confession that he made all by himself, then I say, good for them.
In truth, I doubt they told him this for a number of reasons. First of all everything was captured on video and secondly they did not have the authority to extradite him to the Netherlands as Peru and the Netherlands do not have that type of an agreement.
Joran tells the Dutch newspaper Da Telegraaf, “In my blind panic I signed everything, but never knew what was written on them.”
That is another ridiculous lie out of Joran’s mouth. Of course he knew what was written on them. We saw him taking his time during the confession and reading everything slowly and carefully before he signed anything. If he didn’t understand something in the confession, the Peruvians also had someone from the Dutch embassy available to translate it for him
WHY DOESN’T JORAN EXPLAIN “NOW” INSTEAD OF “LATER “?
“I was tricked,” the paper quoted Van der Sloot as saying of Flores’ killing. “I’ll explain later how it all happened.” Of course he will explain “later” because he needs time in his criminally sick mind to make up a plasuble sounding story.
When people tell you they will “ tell you later”, it usually means they need the time to think about what lies they are going to make up.
PERU IS NOT GOING TO PLAY JORAN’S GAMES
Joran may have toyed with Aruban authorities by his giving and and retracting admissions concerning his involvement in Holloway’s disappearance. But the Peruvians will not stand for it as we are witnessing.
Attorney Maximo Altez who said van der Sloot’s statement in court will focus on how his rights were violated during the investigation. In my view, he is barking up the wrong tree . Peruvian police have defended the interrogation and said van der Sloot’s confession was acquired legally.
And far as rights go, where were Stefany’s rights? Those rights- especially her right to life- was clearly violated.
JORAN’S POOR JUDGMENT IN NOT SPEAKING TO THE JUDGE
So for now, Joran has refused to speak to the judge about the case until it is determined if he confessed with his rights intact.
I believe what he said in his confession was accurate in terms of how he killed Stefany. I believe that her injuries via the autopsy reports will no doubt validate everything he said.
I do not believe for a moment that Stefany used his computer and looked at his email without permission as to the reason why he killed her.
Wouldn’t she need a password to get into his email account? I believe the killed her because she refused to have sex with him. Otherwise why would she have been found with her jeans off?
I believe that Joran’s not speaking to the judge wil result in a harsher sentence for him. He needed to admit what he did and take responsibility for his actions.
LIKE MOST SOCIOPATHS JORAN SEES HIMSELF AS THE PERPETUAL VICTIM
We can see Joran’s classic sociopathology clearly at work here as he makes himself out to be the poor victim who was forced to sign the confession of words which he manufactured which only came out of his own mouth.
The Peruvian authorities didn’t put those words in Joran’s mouth. Joran put them there himself.
Joran also wants you to feel sorry for him because he now has to live with rats that come out through his toilet hole at night.
So now there are small rats in his cell and a huge one- Joran. He should feel right at home with his new pets. But he lets this information out to Da Telegraaf newspaper in an attempt to get people to feel sorry for him in his substandard living conditions.
ENABLER MOTHER ANITA PLAYS THE VICTIM ROLE AS WELL
Anita van der Sloot says her poor Joran was traumatized by the Natalie Holloway ordeal and should have gotten psychiatric help but refused.“Joran is sick in his head, but he wanted no help,” his mother said.
This statement shows how Anita is an enabler. Who cares whether Joran wanted that help or not. She was the mother and needed to see to it that he got that help no matter whether Joran liked it or not. Joran was 16 or 17 at the time- an under age boy. She refers to Joran as a ’Sweet boy’ in the newspaper interview she did with Da Telgraaf. The operative word here was “boy”.
Joran was a boy and she was the adult when she needed to insist he go into therapy during the Natalie Holloway situation. She needed to have laid down some boundaries- such as “no gambling at the casinos until he had therapy.”
His father Paulus certainly had enough pull on the island to call every casino in town and tell them to not let his son into them. He could have reinforced the “no casino and gambling until you get into therapy” boundary for Joran.
Then Anita wants to evoke even more pity on her poor Joran by starting that he blamed himself for his father’s unexpected death earlier this year.”Two days Joran cried. He even hung over the coffin, sobbing.
“It’s my fault, Dad,” he said. “I have caused your heart attack.”
This behavior Joran exhibited at his father’s death is yet another reason Anita should have insisted he get therapy to help him with his grieving. Technically, Joran didn’t cause his father’s heart attack. It was obviously caused by a malfunctioning heart. Maybe his father didn’t go to a doctor for regular checkups od maybe he had an undiagnosed heart disease.
That certainly wasn’t Joran’ fault even though the added stress Joran caused in his father’s life may have added to stressing out his father’s heart.
As soon as Anita noticed how severely Joran was grieving, that is when Anita needed to have put down an ultimatum to her son who immediately moved in with her after his father died. She needed to say “you can only move in with me if you go into therapy.”
His father was dead four months when Anita says “But then one day he left, flying to Peru for a poker tournament” She says this in order to make herself look like a victim.” His mother had four months to make sure and insist he went into therapy and did not do so.
During those four months, Anita needed to bring a therapist to their home if Joran wouldn’t go. If he was having such strong guilt feelings, and was so deponent, she needed to do whatever she had to do an WOMAN UP and tke care of her son’s emotional health. I am sure if Joan’s leg was bleeding uncontrollably , she would have taken him for immediate help. Likewise, mental health was figuratively bleeding uncontrollably and she needed to so the same thing and get him help asap.
Her final statement “If only he had listened to his mother. Then, this would have never happened,” is not only a statement which reflects her being a victim of her son’s not listening to her but said to invoke sympathy and at the same time give herself a pat on the back that she was a good mother. If Joran’s mother would have been more proactive and set boundaries that insisted he go into therapy and under psychiatric care, then all of this may never have happened.
JORANS PSYCH REPORT MAY GIVE CLUE AS TO WHY MOTHER ANITA CANNOT HANDLE JORAN
After reviewing Joran’s psych report it is now even more understandable as to why Joran’s mother had such little control over him. The report says that Joran does not value the female role and disrespects women.
It also stated that he gets violent when contradicted. So if his mother whom he disrespects did insist on his going in to therapy and he didn’t want to go and she persisted and argued with him about it, perhaps Anita would have ended up in the same position and Stefany Flores.Perhaps she knew better than to antagonize Joran.
That may be why she merely suggested that he go for therapy and did not pursue it further She may have been very intimidated and afraid of what Joran would do to her. So she no doubt kept a low profile around him.
The fact that Anita has not yet shown up in Peru speaks volumes. It says that she has clearly abandoned her son this time around. There is no doubt that Anita knows who her son is. She knows he is mentally sick as she said and knows about his temper and violence.
Now it is clear that she wants no part of him . She has washed her hands of him and now he is completely on his own as far as she is concerned . Daddy had died and is no longer there to help him. In Joran’s mother’s eyes , see also sees Joran as dead and as she too is no longer there to help him . www.drlillianglass.com
.
Share on FacebookTags: Anita van der sloot, body language, body language analysis, body language expert, communicaiton expert, confession, Dr. Lillian Glass. www.drlillianglass.com, Joran van der Sloot, Joran van der sloot retracts confession, Joran van der Sloot's confestion, Joran van der Sloot's mother, Joran's psyc report, lillian glass
