Posts Tagged ‘Media Psychologist’

George Zimmerman’s Monotone and Lame Apology To Trevoyn’s Parents May Hurt Him and Gives Insight Into Zimmerman’s Character

Friday, April 20th, 2012

Today George Zimmerman gave an apology to Treyvon Martin’s parents. But that apology I believe hurt him and did not help him. The tone was monotone and  sounded unemotional . It  did not sound heartfelt. In addition his body language was cold . Just as he did not show signs of vocal animation which would reflect sincerity  and contrition, he he did not show any signs of physical animation in his body language.  Vocally and physically his actions  looked and sounded robotic and insincere.

The lack of sincerity in the tone to me seemed like he was doing this to improve his image with the public.  I am not the only one who thought  this as the prosecuting  attorney immediately asked if he was apologizing because the press was present. George denied it.

The analysis of his statement and words were as telling as his monotone voice. A person who is sincere would have said things a lot differently than George  did. He would have also shown some genuine emotion when he spoke. His voice would have reflected sorrow, which it did not

He would have said   “I’m sorry for the loss of your son,” and  left it at that. He  would have said it with an emotional tone and with an upset look on his face. He would not have added

“I did not know how old he was, “I thought he was a little bit younger than I was and I did not know if he was armed or not.”

If  Treyvon’s parents are upset with Zimmerman’s apology I believe they have every right to be. This “apology” appeared self serving to me.  Is Zimmerman saying that if Treyvon was 19 or 25 or even 40 it would have made a difference that he was shot?

Why is he talking about not knowing  that Treyvon was armed or not during an apology to the parents? This information is what needed to have been discussed in the courtroom during a trial not  during an attempt to apologize to the parents.

Zmmerman has  a new attorney. I can’t imagine his attorney allowing him to say this in court as it may come back to haunt him during the trial. Just his monotone face and voice alone could be used against him. The prosecuting tourney can show this to a jury and see that he was not sincere.

This leads me to believe that George Zimmerman is a loose canon who does not listen to anyone including the dispatcher who told him not to follow Treyvon or to his former attorneys.

His former attorneys gave a presser last week stating that George was not in contact with them and  said that he did not heed their advice. In essence George passively aggressively dropped them without speaking to them directly and telling them he wanted to seek other counsel. The attorneys at their presser were not supportive of Zimmerman’s actions and behavior in relation to how he dealt with them.

This new incident of Zimmerman speaking like he did court and saying what he said makes me wonder how much control his new attorney has over him. Perhaps he told his new  attorney he wanted to apologize  to the parents and the attorney thought it was a good idea. But I am sue that there is no way Zimmerman shared the rest of his  apology  with his new attorney  about making  a statement about Trevyvon’s age and whether or not he was armed. If he did, I am sure that his new  attorney would have prohibited him from doing so.

This action may very well give us more insight as to Zimmerman’s personality and character of being hot headed, doing what he wants to do and ignoring others who are in charge.   His actions today have turned off a lot of people, including myself. It showed a lack of compassion and a lack of sincerity.

I agree with the prosecutor  who stated that it was “really aggressive,” that Zimmerman made the statement to Trayvon’s parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, who were sitting in the courtroom. What was aggressive was that he was in essence justifying his actions and pleading his case.

Upon further questioning by the prosecutor  ,Zimmmerman said that he had asked his previous lawyers to express his sorrow to the Martin family. But what about his current lawyer? He needed to have his new counsel be his spokesperson and express sympathy to the young boy’s parents. So it confirms that he is not respecting his own current attorney who trying to  guide what comes out of his client’s mouth before trial.  www.lillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Paris Hilton’s Body Language in Latest Mug Shot Shows Confident Smug Smile That She Will Skirt Cocaine Charge Against Her

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

 SMILING WITH CONFIDENCE

Paris Hilton who was recently arrested for cocaine possession is no stranger to arrests and  mug shots. But unlike her previous mug shots, this time she did a  her ¾ model like turn to the camera, tilted her head and gave a slight Mon-Lisa like closed lipped smile.

The smile spoke volumes. It wasn’t an overly happy excited smile with raised cheekbones. Instead it was a knowing smile. It was a smile that indicated all will work out for her in her favor  and that she really didn’t have a care in the world. It said “ nothing will happen to me and I will get away with this just like I got away with my arrest this summer at the World Cup Match in South Africa in suspicion of marijuana.”   

HIGH PRICED POWERFUL LAWYERS TO PARIS’ RESCUE

 How couldn’t it world out well for her? After all there was more publicity to keep her relevant and on the front pages of the news. Paris’  facial expression indicated that she did not have a care in the world. It showed confidence the confidence of having a  a high priced powerful and connected attorney  who will very likely be able to get her off of this charge of cocaine possession  on some sort of  a technicality.

 Unlike the average Joe who is caught with cocaine, unfortunately Paris gets  to thumbs her nose up against the system and most likely  walk away.

  Apparently in Wynn security cameras filmed the Vegas police searching her handbag and putting her under arrest inside the security office of the Wynn Hotel in after arrested with her latest boyfriend Cy Waits after being pulled over by cops who smelled marijuana. 

 Instead of being arrested right away, Paris was taken into the Wynn’s security office where — as the Las Vegas Metro police put it — “it was discovered that Ms. Hilton had cocaine in her possession.”  Then was she arrested.

Paris lawyer Vegas attorney David Chesnoff believes her  arrest captured on tape, could help her tremendously as he will claim it was an illegal search, in part because she was taken away from the scene to this other location. Chesnoff will also be able to take apart every single thing that happened during the search and arrest because he’ll have the video to work off of. 

So now there is a side show instead of the real issue of Paris having illegal drugs on her. Paris’ repeatedly claimed while she was being detained that the purse wasn’t hers.  While the purse may not have been hers, was the cocaine hers? Perhaps a fingerprint analysis could determine that.    

   WILL PARIS’ NEW BEAU BE ABLE TO SKIRT THE LAW AS WELL?

                                  

Paris’ latest beau Cy Waits was also arrested , But he was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol where he could get up to a year in county jail.

But Waits’ also has a high powered attorney. His attorney  said “”As the case proceeds, a lot of facts are going to come to light that will ultimately lead to exoneration.”

 Let’s hope not. Let’s hope that justice is served and the message is sent out loud and clear that those who use and are caught with illegal drugs of any kind will have to suffer the consequences no matter how much money or fame they have.  

WHERE IS THE MESSAGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO OUR YOUNG PEOPLE? 

 As you well know from reading my blogs I am disturbed by young women who are in the limelight like Paris who exhibit bad heavier and are subsequently rewarded  for their  bad behavior with millions of dollars, television shows etc. I do not like the  message this give to our young women.

Young people need to know loudly and clearly that no matter who a person is or how much money they have, if they do something wrong they will be held accountable. They need to know that they  can not  get away with things. They need to be fully aware of the fact that they will not receive rewards for bad  behavior or illegal actions.They need to know that Paris Hilton cannot be an exception to the rule. They need to see that she is treated as anyone else who breaks the law.

 PARIS’ PREVIOUS EMPTY WORDS

 After Paris  spent only half of her 45 day sentence in a Los Angeles jail three years ago, she appeared on Larry King Live when she was released. On the show,  she said her jail experience caused her to re-evaluate the role partying played in her life.

Perhaps she needs  yet another jail sentence to help her further re-evaluate her priorities. Let’s hope that our young people don’t continue to get the message that  all is not equal when doing the  wrong thing and that there there is a different set of rules for the rich and famous. www.drlillianglass.com

:

Share on Facebook

Dr. Lillian Glass Never Lies About What She Sees, Including Kate Gosselin and Bodyguard’s Body Language

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010


Oftentimes different magazine, internet,  and television show venues  will ask me what I think about a particular celebrity or newsmaker’s relationship. They will often present me with a series of photos or videos and ask for my assessment.

Most recently HollywoodLife. com  asked me to comment on the relationship between Kate Gosselin and her bodyguard Steve Neild. I gave them my honest assessment based on various tells which I observed. This is only my opinion and my view. I did not  personally hang out with  Kate or Steve or witness their alleged coziness firsthand.

Apparently there have been documented reports of  physical sightings where Kate and her body guard have become rather cozy with legs touching legs. In fact the esteemed Huffington Post reported it.

I stated in the Hollywoodlife.com blog that that Kate seemed to fancy her bodyguard based on her body language. Steve, on the other hand continued to show professional decorum as you can see in these photos below.

Apparently,  the Kate Gosselin lovers  and fans on their  “Kate Plus Eight Gosselin Family Fansite”   were all up in arms and got their panties in a bunch stating that I made up lies to  promote myself and to insult Kate. This is not true.

In the first place, I do not need Kate Gosselin to promote myself. I have being doing body language analysis well before there was a Kate Gosselin in the media. As far as insulting Kate is concerned, it was never my thought or intention to insult Kate. I was merely describing my personal body language observations.

Here are some excerpts from the  HollywoodLife.com article:

We told you earlier that Kate and longtime bodyguard Steve Neild got cozy while vacationing in Bald Head Island, N.C. during the week of Aug. 9. A shocking eyewitness report from The Huffington Post alleges that the duo were sitting side-by-side, legs touching, on the beach!

Photo #1: “Her head is cocked like she’s interest to know what Steve thinks. He is kind of in control here and she’s not used to that. Look at her toe, they are in sync step wise, and there’s one foot where her toe is facing him — she really likes him. Her shoulders are a little rounded and hunched over meaning she’s being a little subservient. The fact that his hands are in his pockets shows he’s hiding something like he’s hiding what’s going on between them.”

Photo #2: “Look at the way she’s looking at him. It’s like he’s her man servant and she can yell at him. Her foot is directly in the back of him and she’s looking at him like she’s trying to control him and tell him what to do. Kate’s legs are spread wide which means it’s very casual and very very comfortable with this guy … overly comfortable.”

Photo #3: “With her hand on the hip it’s kind of like an arrogant and defiant pose. Her shoulders are rounded again and she’s leaning into him. The distance between them is too close like he’s trying to keep it hidden and professional, but she’s giving it away. It appears in this photo that she likes him more than he likes her with the way he is facing.”


Photo #4: “Her face shows that she’s very happy around him. You never see Kate smile. She’s a step behind him and there’s not a lot of distance between them. They are also in sync again and that indicates she likes him. Again, he has a hand in his pocket which reveals he’s hiding something.

It’s definitely possible they are having an affair. She’s very comfortable around him.”

POSSIBLE” MEANS POSSIBLE

Notice that I said  the word “possible”, I didn’t say they were  100 per cent  having an affair , I said “possible”.

Whether you love Kate or not you have to admit that anything is possible, especially when people spend as much time around one another as these two apparently do, with reported adjoining rooms in hotel stays.

I am not saying they are or they are not having an affair as I am not in their room.  But I will say that they do look rather cozy in my view.’’

TELLING THE TRUTH AND CLEARING UP  FALSE MISCONCEPTIONS AND MISINFORMATION

As a result of this article many Kate supporters, didn’t bother to read what I said exactly but instead,  blindly went off half cocked. They looked at a headline which I did not write and made many comments where they tried to minimize my background and education  in an attempt to dismiss what I had to say in order to make themselves feel better.

So I decided to address and clarify  their issues so there would be no misunderstandings.

Being an open person with nothing to hide, I will address the  concerns and comments from the Kate loving fans  so they can rest easy.

  1. What I do in body language analysis has nothing to do with  neurolinguistic  programming. Body language analysis is both and art in having experience in knowing how to read others and a science based on research concerning specific behaviors which indicate specific meaning.

2. Kate’s alleged “pigeon toedness” that a commenter suggested was not a factor in  describing her body language tells with Steve Neild

3. As far  as any comments I made  regarding the  Gosselin kids are concerned, when Jon and Kate were going through their split up, I was a proponent of their speaking with a counselor to help them with the transition, especially since the divorce was so public, ugly and tense.

Kate even publicly  stated how it was difficult for the kids and how the kids were acting out at the time. I believed and still believe that seeking the advice of a licensed professional that specializes in treating children who appear to be acting out or undergoing stress, can only help a child.

4. As for my background, I am more than happy to share it with you. I am not a medical doctor – an MD. I  do have a PhD in Communication Disorders from the University of Minnesota and a Masters Degree from the University of Michigan in Speech communication. I also have a strong background in the study of psychology although I am not a practicing or licensed psychologist. I have a post doctorate in Medical Genetics  from UCLA where I was the only PhD in an MD program where I closely examined structures and behaviors related to specific genetic disorders. My training in this field has been  instrumental in terms of my developing my body language reading skills.

I have spent close to three decades doing communication and body language analysis not only for my clients in my private practices, but for the Hollywood community for various films and television shows,  as well as using my skills in the law enforcement and legal communities. I have also written numerous books on the topic and lectured around the world.

5. As  far as being a Kate Hater is concerned, I do not hate Kate as I have said repeatedly. In fact, I  respect that she has numerous mouths to feed and has found a way to earn a living in the media to support her children. I believe that she is indeed very lucky to have a guardian angel like TLC to support her and her family.

6.And finally, I have  discovered is that there are lot of Kate fans or shall I say “fanatics” who cannot bear to hear anything they may perceive as negative when it may in fact not be negative at all. To them, I say, take off your blinders and look at what” is”, not at what is the fantasy you created there to be.

If  Kate is having an affair with her bodyguard, that is her business. Maybe they spent so much time together and found they had a lot in common. Maybe they fell in love. Maybe he fell out of love with his wife. Maybe he has an open marriage.  Only Steve and Kate know this for sure.

Like everyone else, Kate certainly deserves love.  As I said anything is “possible.” While it is possible that they are an item, it is also “possible”It is also “possible” that they are just very cozy close intimate friends. Only time will tel for sure.www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Laurence Fishburne’s Daughter’s Body Language Show’s She’s Enjoying Getting Back At Oscar Nominated Father

Friday, August 13th, 2010

When you look at the above photo of  Lawrence Fishburne and his daughter Montana back at a Martin Luther King event  in  2006 when she was around 15, you can see that Lawrence is not paying much attention to his daughter. She doesn’t look that thrilled in this photo either,  as she looks down. There doesn’t appear to be that much of a connection between father and daughter.

Then on closer examination of the two at the same event, you can see how she appears to be looking at her father for some attention or some recognition or some acknowledgment.His shoulder is out  in front of her and she is in the background in her father’s shadows. If he took his daughter out to his event, you,would think he might smile a bit, look over  at his daughter, embrace her,  or show her off a bit as a proud father.

While no one knows for sure what the relationship was between father and daughter while Montana was  growing up,  perhaps these photos captured the essence of their relationship- distant.

If this type of  energy was captured in a photo four years ago, it makes you wonder how much attention Laurence paid  to his daughter in her early life.

If  he was  distant to her or ignored her, is that why she is now coming out as a porn star? Is it to get back at daddy and finally get his attention by publicly embarrassing him for all the  times he didn’t pay any attention to her?

After looking at her body language during her interview with E!’s Guiliana Ransik, it was clear that she was getting some enjoyment at rattling  the cage and finally getting her Oscar nominee and well respected actor father  to notice her.

Apparently, her father was said to be so rattled by his daughter’s porn debut, that it was reported that he unsuccessfully  attempted to but up all the videos of his daughter from the production company, Vivid Entertainment.

When Guiliana asks Montana is her father was upset with her, she lets out a lough laugh and a shows a huge genuine smile, complete with raised cheeks, squinted eyes and lots of teeth, She is clearly thrilled that she made such an impact on her father to the point that he got upset. The fact that he actually showed emotion towards her no doubt thrilled her.

You can then see a big smile on her face as she says that it is hard for any ” any dad to see his daughter like that.” He smile shows that she is no doubt pleased at this.

I

In this photo Montana relays that she has had communication with her father but not about her porn video. As you can see she back away and does a shoulder shrug.

This is often  indicative of someone who may not be telling all or telling the truth. She also raised her eyebrows and purses her lips at the same time which indicates that she doesn’t want to say more because most likely she knows what she said is not the case.

It is hard to believe that a father who tried to buy up all of his daughters porn videos would not have a few words with her about the subject. If they communicated, it would have most likely been before he knew about her upcoming porn  career. If they did communicate after he knew about the porn video, I am sure they did not just  discuss  the weather. Frankly, I imagine he was so upset with her that I  doubt they communicated at all.

Then the truth comes out as Montana admits that she and her father are not on speaking terms. You can see that she suddenly has a serious facial demeanor. She backs away and  also turns her shoulder away which may indicate her  upset  at the situation.

Then Montana gets more serious as she says that the reason he is upset about her actions is because it is his reputation and that they are linked together. As she says this you can she lens forward and  that her shoulders are rounded and her  head is bowed and she looks up as she speaks.

This is a signal indicating embarrassment. It is a kind of sheepishness as deep down she knows she has caused her father embarrassment. She in  turn, feels  a bit embarrassed  herself in that she created this embarrassment for him . She knows her power of being linked together as father and daughter and used it in an attempt to tarnish his reputation.

In an interview with TMZ, she said

I heard that he’s mad at me, but I haven’t spoken to him yet,”I feel pretty confident that I can work things out with him. I think he wants to support me in everything I do, and though he sees this now as a negative, I believe in time he will view it as a positive.” .

She can dream on. Laurence will never support her action  after she appeared in a hardcore pornographic video with the tagline “An A-List Daughter Makes her XXX Debut.” How could this man who has worked so hard hos entire live to develop such a stellar reputation in show business, ever see his daughter’s move as positive?

NOT GETTING DAD’S HELP IN SHOW BUSINESS MAY HAVE  LEAD HER TO DOING PORN

In my view based on Montana’s comments and actions indicate that she may be  self entitled and expect things to be handed to her. She said that she was  eager to break into Hollywood and become a star like dad, but doesn’t realize that to become a star like her dad takes a lot of work and a lot of paying her dues something she was not willing to do.

Perhaps she expected dad’s help to get into show business and he ignored her .  Perhaps he told her  to find another profession. Perhaps he told her that she needed to do the work and pay her dues like taking acting classes and  starting off in smaller roles and working her way up. Whatever the case, she decided to capitalize on his good name and go into show business anyway.

She took the fasted route towards fame and notoriety BY taking off her clothes. She saw others do is so she thought, “Why not?”

BLAME IT ON KIM KARDASHIAN

In fact she looked at  Kim Kardashian as  a role model in terms of how to make a name for herself. But what she didn’t  get is that Kim did not intentionally release a porn tape. It was allegedly leaked and she as a reluctant porn star, not a willing one like Montana. She naively says:

“I’ve watched how successful Kim Kardashian became and I think a lot of it was due to the release of her sex tape,”I’m hoping the same magic will work for me. I’m impatient about getting well-known and having more opportunities and this seemed like a great way to get started on it.”

This statement clearly shows how misguided  her thinking appears to be. The only reason Kim Kardashian made it is because of her dealings with Ryan Seacrest and having her own reality show with her sisters and her family. Unless Ryan Seacrest or anyone else offers her a reality show, then she is going nowhere. For many, it might be a curiosity at  first it to see Lawrence Fishburne’s daughter having X rated sex, but after that,  unless she has  unique and special talents and skills, she is just one of the many porn stars who will come and go.

MORE ISSUES WITH MONTANA

Montana’s father isn’t the only man who’s attention Montana was trying to get.  Currently she is being investigated for allegedly roughing up her boyfriend’s ex girlfriend.

In fact she was was arrested in February and accused of breaking into the woman’s home. Forced her into the bathroom and repeatedly bet her. Even though she  pleaded not guilty to simple battery and false imprisonment,she  may be facing on additional charges of assault with a deadly weapon and trespassing.

Apparently this is a very troubled young lady. We will never know  how she became so troubled. We will never know whether she felt neglected or unloved by her father while growing up or whether she was spoiled and over indulged. The bottom line is that she needs to get her father issues  sorted out if she wants live a healthy and productive life with self respect. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Naomi Campbell’s body language of fear on the witness stand. Was she lying or telling the truth?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Based on what she now reported during her testimony at the Hague, it is clearly evident that Naomi Campbell was not telling the truth when she was interviewed by ABC reporters months earlier. During that time, she said that she never received a diamond. As she said this, she showed signals of deception by breaking eye contact and  looking down.

When she was probed further by the reporter and asked if she was brought diamonds, she turned her head and looked away and refused to answer.

Then in typical Naomi Campbell fashion, she abruptly got out of her seat and apparently kicked the ABC camera on her way out.

But when she appeared at the Hague and took the stand in the trial against Charles Taylor, did she continue to lie or was she telling the truth?  Below are some of her communication  and body language  signals when she was asked key questions about Charles Taylor and the diamonds.   

Her hair was pulled up and back and she was dressed in a demure conservative  ivory colored sweater with matching blouse and skirt. What was interesting was that the jewelry she wore around her neck . It was an amulet  in the same of an eye,  which is worn in many countries by people to  defect the  evil eye or superstitiously prevent  any harm to come to that person.

In this photo Naomi is asked if Mr. Taylor had conversations with her specifically. As she says that she did not speak to him, she breaks eye contact and looks down. This behavior is often associated with a signal  deception.

She was then asked if anything happened after she went to her room. In this photo we can see that she is wide eyes which shows fear and  tightly pursing her lips together, indicating that she doesn’t want to tell everything happened.

You can see the muscle tension around her upper lip and chin which indicates that she desperately wants to keep quiet. Her wide eyed looked indicates that she appears to be afraid to speak.

She is then asked, Did you ever learn who these gifts were from. She says “No” and looks up and away, which indicates a signal of deception as to whether she may have indeed known who the gift of a diamond was from.

A shoulder shrug is one of the key “tells” when it comes to determining whether someone is telling the truth or not. In this case, Naomi is relaying a story where she said that Ms. Farrow or Ms. White said that the diamonds must have come from Charles Taylor. After she makes this statement,you can see a definite shoulder shrug as she also breaks eye contact and looks down and lowers her head. These are other signals often seen in deception as well.

When Naomi tells the court that she put the pouch she received on the table and didn’t look at it until the next morning, you can see some additional signals of deception as she lowers her head, looks away, shuts her eyes and purses her lips. This is clearly indicative of her not wanting to talk about what happened. With regard to her answer, to me she does not appear to be forthright.

It also doesn’t make sense to have people come to your door with a pouch and immediately place it on the table and not look at it, even if you were abruptly awakened. It seems that most people would be curious to know what someone gave them, especially after they made the effort of  suddenly awakening coming to the door,  and then taking something that they were handed.

They even asked her if she asked what she was given when these men came to her door. She said “No”. Once again you can see the fear in her face as she gives her answer.

Here she says  she just took it and said thank you but she shakes her head “No” as she relays this testimony. When someone’s body language is incongruous with what they say, this is a red flag in terms of whether or not they may be  telling the truth.

For many, it would be hard to believe that someone would come to your door and you would just take a package and not ask who it was from or what was in the package.

The judge then probed as to whether the men said why they were bringing her the pouch and she said “No”. But her body language “tells” spoke volumes as you can see here. She broke eye contact looked down and there appeared to be considerable tension in her face.

To me, it also makes no sense that people would come to your room to deliver something to you and not tell you who it is from or what was inside of the package you were given.

When a person cocks their head to the side, it is often an indication that they aren’t sure, or they are not telling the truth. In this case, Naomi said that “they were very small and dirty stones.” She also purses her lips to indicate that she doesn’t care to say more.

The head cock tell is very significant, especially when it comes to determining whether or not she was telling the truth about the diamonds she received.

There appears to be conflict between this statement and what Mia Farrow said  Naomi reported to her about having received  a big diamond. Could Naomi have been given little dirty diamonds and one big diamond, like the one she allegedly told Mia Farrow about? Was she minimizing the facts by stating that they were they  were  simply “dirty  little stones?”

Apparently, it was reported that when the charity records were verified, it seemed that Naomi Campbell did not donate the diamonds to Nelson Mandela’s charity  like she said she was planning to do. Allegedly it was discovered  that she made several checks in the amount of $50,000 to the charity and they had no record of receiving the diamonds from her.

Naomi may have also been cocking her head, which often  indicates that a person isn’t  sure of something to indicate that she isn’t sure that she wanted to say more.

There is no question that Naomi was in a precarious position. She attended a dinner for Nelson Mandela. She was no doubt exchanging pleasantries or briefly speaking with Charles Taylor at that dinner.  I do believe that there is truth in what she said about  putting her  attention on her  Nelson Mandela.

If she did indeed speak with Charles Taylor, most likely, she  was not aware of his politics or his nefarious dealings. A s  super model she may have been  invited to this charitable event to add her beauty and public stature to the ambiance. I seriously doubt they got into a heavy discussion about his political dealings and about how his diamonds were obtained or  what he was financing with those diamonds.

I have no doubt that Charles Taylor and every other man int he room was captivated by Naomi’s beauty and charm. Charles Taylor no doubt wanted to  score some points with Naomi.

So he had his associates deliver some diamonds to  her room. It makes common sense that those who delivered the diamonds would say who they were from or what they were. I can only assume that Naomi knew that these diamonds were a gift from Charles Taylor when she took the package, and thought nothing of it.  Perhaps she wanted to donate them to charity but didn’t get around to it.

Perhaps she told Mia Farrow  and Ms White that she got the diamonds as a gift  that evening in order to impress her. I doubt that Mia Farrow or Ms. White, Naomi’s agent would have told her who the diamond or diamonds were from. It seems  more reasonable that Naomi told them that she received a gift from Charles Taylor.

Then the whole thing blew up into a major event with Charles Taylor on trial at the Hague. This was no doubt intimidating for her as it would be for anyone.  There may have  possibly been been threats or warnings to her based on her telling Oprah during an interview that she feared for the safety of her family. There is one thing for certain. Naomi was frightened on the stand.

www.drlillianglass.com

\

Share on Facebook

Mia Farrow’s Body Language and Vocal Patterns Indicated She Appeared To Be Truthful In Her Key Testimony About Naomi Campbell

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

There was no question that when Mia Farrow first arrived on the stand in the courtroom  at the Hauge, her tone was initially shaky  as it  was peppered with “ums”. There was even some lip licking to indicate that she was indeed nervous when initially questioned.

But  when asked key questions by the judges, her tone quickly switched to a much more confident one, complete with  a sonorous and  rich resonance. Her tone appeared to be  indicative of a person who had nothing to hide and who was being forthright.

Likewise, Mia’s body language showed  signals that indicated a  self assuredness and confidence when she was asked key questions. This,  along with her matching  body language, made it appear to me that she was very credible on the stand.

Perhaps the most powerful signal that someone is telling the truth is when their words match their body language, tone of voice, and speech content. When she told the judges  that Naomi Campbell said the diamond was sent by Charles Taylor, she not only had a strong and definite unwavering solid tone, but she immediately shook her head “yes” as confirmation that what she was saying was truthful.

She then relayed that Naomi said  the men had given her a huge diamond. Right after she said it, she  turned and looked directly at the judge who questioned her as if to punctuate what she was saying as being the truth and having noting to hide. When someone gives direct eye contact after a statement it is is often an indicator that someone is telling the truth.

Once again Mia makes direct eye contact with one of the judges and with an open faced expression, confirms what Naomi  also said about  Naomi wanting to give the diamond to Nelson Mandela’s charity.

To me, this photo  above speaks volumes in terms of whether I think Mia is  being  truthful. Notice that she is smiling as she reiterates how excited Naomi appeared at the breakfast table when telling about the everyone at the table about the diamond,  which Naomi said she secured the night before. In essence, Mia appears to be re-living the moment of Naomi’s excited state. That leads me to believe that she is telling the truth.

Now we see and angry and upset look with a great deal of tension in the jaw indicating anger after hearing Naomi;s testimony read by the judge where Naomi  accuses Mia of  being the one who said  that the diamonds must have come from Charles Taylor. She is also  looking directly at the judge as she loudly and confidently stated ” Absolutely Not! Naomi Campbell stated they came from Charles Taylor.”

To me, it looked and sounded like Mia Farrow was being truthful in terms of everything she relayed in the courtroom. www.drlillianglass.com

Ca

Share on Facebook

ITLESS and Infamous Women Rewarded- Kate Gosselin, Michaele Salahi, Rachel Uchitel, Ashley Dupree and Alexis Neiers-What Message Does It Give To Our Young Women?

Sunday, August 8th, 2010

 TALENT IS WHAT COUNTS, NOT SPIN AND HYPE FOR THE ITLESS

As you well know from reading my blogs, I cannot stand spin or hype or manipulating the public. I don’t like it when the public is fed lies or when people are easily given a free ride when they don’t deserve it. In essence, I like the truth! Most of all I like it when people who work very hard for what they do are justly rewarded for their efforts.

Having worked with so many celebrities and extremely talented people over the years in helping them hone their communication and body language skills for so many film and television roles,  I definitely know who has IT and who doesn’t. I know how hard these people work at making themselves the best they can be. I have seen their considerable efforts and what it takes to make it first hand.

That is why it disturbs me greatly when I see people who have repeatedly been “abusive and entitled ” like Kate Gosselin, “alleged White House gate crashing” Michaele Salahi, “jailed burglar of the wealthy” Alexis Neiers, and “ don’t call me a whore or a hooker even though I have repeated sex with married men or I will sue you”, Rachel Uchitel taking up space and getting rewarded for their bad behaviors with television shows and tons of air time.

IN TV, LOTS OF EYEBALLS TRANSLATE INTO  LOTS OF DOLLARS AND CENTS

In my view, these women have absolutely nothing to offer.  But television executives would disagree with me. To them, these women have a lot to offer- lots of eyeballs watching shows on which they appear . They don’t care if  they are hated by the public  or they  did or immoral or  illegal acts.

As long as people are watching them on TV and ratings are high , they are thrilled. When ratings are high that means the networks  can charge a lot of money to advertisers to buy commercials. That translates into more money for the networks. That is called the bottom line.

So as long as the public watches people they love to hate, the longer they will stay in the public eye. It’s a sad commentary but unfortunately, it is true.

THE UNTALENTED ,ENTITLED,  AND ITLESS KATE GOSSELIN

When networks see that they have a cash cow, like they did with Kate Gosselin, they will do anything and everything to make sure that they succeed no matter how ITLESS they are. They will re make their physical image andshow them off  on every major show like Dancing With the Stars so they will get more popular and so that even more people will watch them on their network.

That is exactly what they did with Kate Gosselin. It doesn’t matter if you or I believe that Kate has absolutely nothing to offer. It doesn’t matter whether  you or I think she has some relevant  issues in her psyche that causes her to be so  angry, arrogant, and self centered to name a few. She will continue to alienate people and she will continue to do it over the airwaves. She was even invited to do Sara Palin’s new show in order to boost the ratings.

Like it or not, this woman is here to stay with not one, but with  two television shows and a myriad of appearances and television specials. This former nurse  simply took fertililty pills and got pregnant with septuplets, six of whom survived in her womb.   Luckily a guardian angel- TLC  found her. They helped her out and gave her a show, so she could feed her family. We,  in turn got to watch cute babies develop. At first, people watched the show because of the cute kids. But then, even more people watched  the show  to see how awful Kate was and how terribly she abused  husband Jon.

Then the fiasco between them exploded into a full blown media He Say She Says war, which made even more people watch their show.  TLC was thrilled as people took sides and waited to see the “bad car accident”.

Then Jon pulled the plug, not allowing the kids on the air. He went even further to try and destroy TLC’s ,by trashing Kate so badly and causing so much havoc in the press with his multiple relationship scandals.

This pissed off TLC to no end and they were not going to allow him to  destroy their money making TV venture.  So they showed him a thing or two. They not only gave Kate her own show, but a second show to boot. In addition they slapped him with a lawsuit and silenced him.

They took this “itless” untalented, nasty, self absorbed woman- Kate Gosselin  and tried to make her into a sympathetic  victim by having her cry all over the airwaves.  (And please don’t waste your time calling me a Kate hater. Kate is not on my hate list. That list is reserved for people like Hitler and Stalin, terrorists, child molesters, and for those who do word for word copying of my work, among others I won’t bother to name ).

I am simply reporting behaviors I have observed. If you can’t see it them as well, let me suggest you take off your blinders and open your eyes and watch a re-run of  her egregious behavior on DWTS when she  fights with her esteemed dance teacher).

TLC  gave her opportunity after opportunity and she of course took it. They were on full throttle and determined to make Kate not only a  household name, but a  house-gold  name earning scores of money for them .

They redid her image from the frumpy housewife to the glamourous beauty, had her co- host the View where millions would see her, appear on late night shows, and on TV specials where they even had her and had her cry on cue to make her appear more sympathetic.  But when they  put her on DWTS they really saw how powerful their brand was.

Her fight with her teacher Tony Dovolani which showed her disrespect and arrogance and entitlement,  garnered the highest ratings.  People who loved her, watched  to see her succeed, while people who hated her watched to see her fail. When she was voted off the show, DWTS ratings plunged and TLC knew they hit the jackpot with Kate.

They even gave her another show and trotted her out there with more books so more people could connect to her. They threw her back on the View and Kimmel Live and everywhere else. TLC created this “itless”  who some consider to be a “monster,” out of spite  for Jon and they succeeded.

So like or not, love her or hate her, she is here to stay no matter how many latters you write or emails you send. The more people hate her the more they will watch her and the higher her ratings will be.

I only hope she remakes her insides as she did with her outsides for the sake of her kids. While both Kate and her “itlessness” bore me, my only concern is for her kids and how they will turn out. I clearly didn’t like it when I saw the videotape of the kids crying in terror when it came time to go back home to Kate after an outing with Jon. While we don’t know the exact reason the childen are terrified, if they are terrified  because of Kate’s behavior towards them, maybe TLC should use some of the money they earned because of  Kate’s infamy and spring for some therapy for both Kate and those kids.

ITLESS MICHAELE SALAHI-  INFAMY AND MORE TV TIME

To me Kate isn’t as disturbing as Michaele Salahi. I find this woman repulsive in every way from her arrogant tone of voice to her pleadingthe fifth and not being forthright. What did she have to hide?  I am even more repulsed that attorney Lisa Bloom for whom I once had a great deal of respect  has stooped so low as to represent this “itless creature. It was bad enough that Lisa represented one of the most TOXIC MEN Michael Lohan who tapes personal conversations with others and sells them to internet venues and who recenty sold a nude photo of his ex fiance sleeping  to one of the internet tabloid outlets. But now, she has gone further in collecting clients the public  loves to hate. I guess she is following in the footsteps of her mother Gloria Allred  who takes on the infamous like Rachel Uchitel and a myriad of  Tiger’s sex partners.

If Michaele had an invitation to the White  House  party,  like she said she did, why didn’t she show it to everyone?  On the Today Show she told how she couldn’t say anything at the hearing  because of Bravo. That may or may or may  not be the case. Did the Salahi’s have an invitation that Bravo gave to her? If so, why didn’t she just admit to that early on ? Or was she so entitled that she told Bravo that it was no biggie- that she could always get into top of the line events with or without an invite.

Now she and or her husband created a huge fiasco saying that Whoopi Goldberg hit her when the video clearly shows that Whoopi was  only trying to get her attention and merely re directing the topic of conversation. There is no question in my mind that  she knew Whoppi meant no malice. Why would Whoopi risk her reputation and position at the View to hit a guest? It made no sense other than Michaele and her, whom  I perceive as TOXIC husband Tareq,  trying to get more media time.

When her, whom I perceive as  TOXIC  husband Tareq got into the fray and upset Whoopi with accusations she hit his wife and started taking photos of her, I knew then and there what he was trying to do. He was trying to parlay this non incident  into more infamy for his  wife, whom people on her own show found TOXIC .

One thing is for sure, people who would never think of tuning into the DC Housewives, on Bravo will do so now. Because of this incident, Michaele will always  be assured her spot on the show as the villain. I am sure that Bravo is thrilled to no end that this fiasco occurred. Remember the bottom line is more eyeballs equal more revenue for the network.

So the this stylishly dressed , skeletal , very masculine voiced, opportunist who put national security in jeopardy by getting that close to the President of the United States without proper security clearance. is here to stay- at least on Bravo, Many would agree with Sheei Shephard on the View that she should have been put in jail rather than on a televison show.

ITLESS RACHEL UCHITEL- “CANT SAY “YOU KA TELL SHE’S A HOOKER” EVEN THOUGH SHE HAS BEEN A SEX MATE TO MANY MARRIED MEN,  OR YOU WILL BE SUED”

Then there is Rachel Uchitel. Attorney Lisa Bloom’s mother Gloria Allred was able to secure millions upon millions of dollars for Rachel. She also made it clear that no one could call Rachel a “hooker” or a “whore”, even though many may  look at her in those terms and will always look at her in those terms.

In fact she threatened the View and Joy Behar with a lawsuit if Joy didn’t apologize for the plays he made on Rachel’s last name , “Uchitel” by saying “You ka tell she’s a hooker.” Another comedian even got sued for calling her a “whore.” However, doesn’t seem too worried about the suit, Maybe he has information which can prove she is or  has been a whore.  If he does, then  you can then call her a “whore” without being sued.  To me a whore is someone who exploits others for money. I think getting an alleged  10 million dollars to  buy her silence and not speak publicly about Tiger Woods would fall into that category.

So the message was sent  out not to defame her. But what Rachel doesn’t get is that she defamed herself by having sex with at least two married men of whom we know.

Rachel  allegedly helped break up a marriage and she got rewarded for this not only with what is an alleged 10 million dollars, but with television time. Xtra gave her a TV gig as a reporter, even though she did an awful job in my view and was the ultimate in being ITLESS.

She  was unbearable to listen to with  her hyper-nasal monotone voice and even more unbearable to  watch with  her expressionless monotone face as she constantly brushed her hair back and pursed her over glossed overly inflated lips. Yet, she no doubt received a hefty compensation to do this even though there were so many more qualified,  beautiful, and talented young women who were  journalism graduates to boot, to do this job.

Rachel is no doubt gearing up for an Image Rehab. That is why she agreed to appear on Celebrity Rehab with Dr. Drew.  She has no doubt, realized that you can have ten million dollars but if people still  view her as a skank and a whore, homewrecker or a hooker, or a low life,  even if you can’t say it publicaly,it doesn’t matter.If people look at you like  alow life and have no respect for you and disdain for you, all the money in the world doesn’t matter as you are  vilified forever and considered a  joke.

So she went into Celebrity Rehab, and together with Dr Drew they came up with some type of addiction for her to use as an excuse for her egregious past behavior. Maybe it will be an addiction to  pills  or an addiction to her relationship with her father in  looking for that father image in married men , or maybe it will be due to an addiction to money and rich and famous men who take care of her financially. I guess we will have to watch the show to find out the big reveal of “ Rachel’s Addiction.”

Even if she is addicted to whatever, it is still no excuse for what she did. Lots of people are addicted to something and don’t act like she did.  People resent her even  more for her capitalizing on the tragedy and earning what is said to be ten million dollars in exchange for her silence towards Tiger Woods.

After watching her body language and how she comes across in interviews, she is not a likeable character and no coaching int he world can ever make her likeable.  There is something in her character that pops out on screen- the entitlement, arrogance, and hardness. When she spoke of being the Original” Mean Girl” in an Xtra interview she had with Mario Lopez, it  said all we needed to know about Rachel. There still appears to be a mean edge about her. It seems to be who she is based on all of the interviwes we have seen of her thus far.

Even if she and Tiger happen to reconnect and he marries her, as the tabloids have recently reported, she will always be looked at by the public with an evil eye. She will always be seen as the other woman and a homewrecker.

The villain label fits her and I don’t believe she can ever shake it no matter what she does. I am sure that this label will be cemented forever, as we watch her clash with super model Janice Dickenson who will also appears on the  Celebrity Rehab show . No matter what you say about Janice, she has earned her stripes. She pioneered her field and worked really hard for everything she has in life. Unlike, Rachel, no one gave Janice a free financial ride.

FORMER PROSTITUTE ASHLEY DUPREEE AND JAILED THEIF ALEXIS NEIRES –HORRIBLE MESSAGE TO YOUNG GIRLS

What bothers me is the message that this is being giving to out young girls by rewarding egregious behavior. It’s not only Rachel Uchitel ( whom you can;t call a hooker or a whore or she will sue you) who got a lot of good things in life for doing bad things. It is other women who were prostitutes  for madams,  like Ashley Dupree, who got rewarded with air time and her own advice column in a New York newspaper.

Instead of giving such a gig to a qualified relationship expert, the message is that just by having sex with famous men, you too can get you rich and famous, especially of you get caught.

The message is also that even if you burglarize things from the rich and famous like 18 year old Alexis Neires did, you can get rich and famous as well. If you happen to get caught, you can get even richer and more famous and even get your own TV show like Alexis did on the E! channel with her show “Pretty Wild TV!”.

IF THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH EYEBALLS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH MONEY AND NO SHOW

The whole thing absolutely repulses me. Someone needs to put their foot down and say” enough is enough “ when it comes to rewarding people for egregious behavior. While someone definitely needs to set these standards, perhaps  that “someone” is us.

Remember- eyeballs translate into money for the networks. The less eyeballs, the less money. So keep that in mind the next time you are curious about watching  Kate Gosselin, Rachel Uchitel, Michaele Salahi, or Alexis Neiers. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Lee Anthony, Accused of Sexual Molestation By Sister Casey, Exhibits Inappropriate Behaviors on Witness Stand Mouthing “I Love You” to Sister

Monday, July 19th, 2010

CINDY’S STUNT IN THE COURTROOM SAYING CAYLEE IS STILL ALIVE WON’T WORK AT TRIAL

It was hard enough  to stomach Cindy Anthony lying through her teeth  as she told Jose Baez and the world that she believed Caylee was still  alive as a  lame attempt to save Casey’s worthless hide by trying to instill reasonable doubt.

Has premature senility set in? Doesn’t she remember that  Caylee’s bones were found along with her skull that still had light brown hair attached to it? Doesn’t she remember that there was duct tape across Caylee’s dismembered head? Perhaps Jose Baez needed to show her the photos of  dead Caylee’s duct  taped skull to refresh her memory .Then she wouldn’t act like the TOXIC person she appears to be, in trying to manipulate a potential jury.

I can assure you that when a jury is present and she tries to pull this stunt, the prosecution will be all over her. They will ask her why she had a memorial that she alone organized if Caylee was still alive? One does memorials for dead people not for people who are still alive.

There certainly are people who are in  such denial  they may still believe  a granddaughter was still alive when she wasn’t. Their body language and voice and speech patterns would reflect this. Cindy is clearly not one of these people. She knew exactly what she was doing on the stand. She was too coherent, too articulate, too precise, too together, and too knowledgeable to pull off this ridiculous stunt she tried to do.

LEE’S BEHAVIOR WAS REPREHENSIBLE!

But to next watch Lee Anthony act like a complete buffoon was equally if not more appalling. His attempts to be cutesy and funny and loveable were nauseating. But even more nauseating was the disrespectful and inappropriate stunt he  get go.

Also don’t the male Anthony’s own a tie and a pair of nice slacks? When people know they are going to be testifying in  a court of law, they usually dress in something a lot more respectable than a pair of old worn, stained blue jeans and an untucked golf shirt as you see above. Lee looked like a complete slob in my view. A jury will not respond well to Lee and his  attire has a lot to do with it. I am surprised that  his attorney didn’t   give him some tips on how to dress in the courtroom.

His disrespect in the courtroom was also evidenced from the get go as he pointed both fingers in front of him as he was confused as to where to go in terms of getting on the witness stand.

He needed to quietly ask his attorney and not rudely point and shuffle. His walk to the stand was a cocky one. He literally bounced to the stand .He seemed overly self confident and overly full of himself at that point, which was a first impression turn off. 

WHAT DID HE SAY??? “I LOVE YOU” TO A SISTER HE ALLEGEDLY SEXUALLY MOLESTED?

Then he had the audacity to mouth the words “I LOVE YOU” to his sister Cayleee. This is the same sister who told Jesse Grund her former fiance that at her brother  Lee sexually molested her.

This is also the same sister who told a fellow inmate that her brother sexually molested her. Perhaps you believe that she may have told her fellow inmate this on purpose to help her case. Perhaps you may feel that Casey thought  in case her letters became public, the sexual molestation excuse would be a solid  reason as to why she allegedly killed Caylee.

But the fact that she told Jesse Grund very early on about Lee’s sexual abuse convinces me that something sexual may very well happened between Casey and her brother.  I have a lot of respect for the Grund family and I believe that Jesse was telling the truth to law enforcement with respect to what Casey shared with him about Lee.

If  Lee did sexually molest her and now tells her how much he loves her on the stand  it is beyond sickening to me. The prosecutor was equally sickened as she wanted to bring what he did to the attention of the court. She cleaverly said ” I take it that that wasn’t meant for me?”

Instead of saying, ”No”  and feeling embarrassed about what he did, he bellows out in a loud tone”No definately not.”

It was completely disrespectful. Since Judge Perry runs such a strict and tight ship I  am surprised he did not admonish Lee for this and warn him not to have personal communication with the defendant.

LEE’S DISRESPECT TOWARDS CHENEY MASON

 Cheney Mason attempted to make light of his hearing problems and hearing aids as an attempt to let people know he is hearing impaired. He did it in order to  diffuse any embarrassment  in case he was not able to  catch every word the witness may say. By bringing  it out in the open he was also letting the witness know that he may ask them to repeat their answer if he doesn’t catch what they say the first time around.

The hearing aid issue appeared to be an issue with regard to microphone feedback as a humming noise was heard periodically. Cheney made light of it as he mentioned that he couldn’t believe two hearing aid batteries could cause that much static.

The information Cheney Mason revealed was NOT meant to be thrown back at him in the form of a joke.

So when Lee wasn’t focused on what Cheney asked him he didn’t remember  what Cheny had asked him. .  Instead of politely asking Cheney to repeat the question, he tried to be cutesy and funny and says that there is static in his ears. He then laughed at  his own joke.

Lee’s behavior  was disrespectful and inappropriate. He was completely out of line. His behavior would definitely NOT endear him to any jury. During the trial Lee needs to cut the cutesy funny guy routine if he is intent on trying to save his sister from the lethal needle.  www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

George Anthony’s Body Language Says He’s Not Into Cindy and Does Not Want to Be in Court Supporting Casey

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

  

 b  

 After watching and analyzing George Anthony s exclusive Fox 35 interview a while back, it became clear that George needs to be liked and needs to be seen as the “good guy”. So in keeping up his  ”good guy” image,  he decided to show up in court to support his wife Cindy, who was going to testify about the 911 call she made when Casey wouldn’t cooperate and Caylee went missing.  

 The only thing is that he certainly didn’t look like a  supportive “good guy”  husband .  He kept his distance  from her physically.  

    In the photo above  which was taken after Cindy testified and  was listening to Judge Perry’s ruling, you can see that although  they are sitting close to one another, they are  not touching. There is no physical contact. It is obvious from Cindy’s nail biting that she could have used a little TLC and reassurance. She could have used an arm around her  or a hand held.  But George seemed to be in a world of his own.   

   When you look at the physical distance that George is keeping from Cindy it is not a very good sign. Also note how Cindy turns away from George. It is clear that they are both not happy together.  

 The stress of this trial is definitely showing. One can only imagine what will happen in terms of their relationship when the major trial begins next year.  

 GEORGE  HAS NOTHING TO LAUGH ABOUT WITH CASEY’S  SEXUAL MOLESTATION ACCUSATIONS     

 

 Even before she testified, Cindy shared a little tension releasing laugh with her attorney Brad Conway. George completely ignored her as he pulled his shoulder away from her and towards his body. This is  a  clear distancing signal.    

George certainly had nothing to laugh about, especially since he was accused of sexually molesting Casey. In all honesty, I can’t imagine anyone ever laughing about anything with regard to this case! An innocent  child is dead and Cindy’s daughter may soon  die on death row.  So Cindy’s chuckle with attorney Brad Conway  clearly  turned George  off even further.    

 A TURNED OFF GEORGE   

   

George looks absolutely miserable. He doesn’t acknowledge Cindy at all.  His shoulders are rounded in a submissive posture as he is resigned to be somewhere he clearly does NOT want to be.  

 His face is sour and dour, complete with downturned lips and furrowed brow and very sad looking eyes. They are completely disconnected. Cindy  on the other hand seems to be excited about giving her testimony as she is all smiles.  

 Not to be petty, but since body language involves what you chose or do not chose  to wear on your body, it seems that Cindy has chosen to not  wear a bra or to wear a very ill fitting one. The fact that she is wearing a Caylee necklace on her chest, brings attention to her chest so it is hard not to notice.   

 With all the money she earned from licensing the photos of Casey, perhaps she should use some of it to purchase some proper fitting under garments. Once again I am not being mean here, I am just telling it like it is.  It speaks volumes about her  self care.  

             DARK  ROOTS AND SELF CARE      

 

 And while we are on the subject  of  Cindy’s outward appearance and her self care , it is clear that she has taken a cue from Casey. Like Casey, she too is growing her hair out.  

 

But if one has decided to have longer hair and also be a blond, it is necessary to take more self care and bleach out your roots because it shows up more and doesn’t look good. If she  can’t afford to do that, then she may want  stick to  her original hair color shown in her roots. If she insists on being a blond and doesn’t have the money or the time to keep up  her roots, then she needs to cut it short so that  the roots aren’t as visible to others.  

  LOOK OF DISGUST AND DISDAIN    

 

   

There is no question in my mind based on watching the raw  video of  George and Cindy  in the courtroom  that George appears to be disgusted by Cindy based on his facial expression whenever he looks at her. There are consistent  and numerous  flashes of disgust in his facial expression.  

 There is no doubt that he is disgusted with his daughter  Casey for either lying that he molested her, if in fact  he did not do so,  or outing  him if he did indeed molest her  and Casey’s  breaking the family bond of  loyalty and exposing the family secret.Rather than show his sour puss to the world and passive aggressively show up for image sakes so that he  can be seen as the “good guy” – the  supportive husband and father, it would have been a lot more genuine if  he sayed at home.  

 GUM CHEWING GEORGE    

 

   

 If George would have stayed home, he could have chewed all the gum he wanted in the privacy of his own home.  

  Why doesn’t  George’s attorney and friend Brad Conway teach him some proper courtroom etiquette? Since has neglected to do his job, perhaps I can do it for him  and educate George through this blog.   

  When you go into a courtroom it is not a movie theatre or a baseball game. You cannot eat or drink in there or chew gum there. To do so would be disrespectful. George’s  gum chewing in the courtroom shows complete ignorance of how to comport yourself in a courtroom and complete disrespect.  

  So here is the bottom line to George and Cindy too. Take a Kleenex and spit out your gum BEFORE you walk into the courtroom. I am sure that there are trash cans around where you can deposit the Kleenex containing the gum.  

 And speaking of disrespect int he courtroom, it seems that the apple does not fall to far from the tree.  I will get to George’s son Lee Anthony’s disrespectful courtroom  behavior  in my next blog.  

   MORE DISTANCING BODY LANGUAGE  FROM GEORGE   

     

George and Cindy are not a united front as far as their body language reveals. He sits out in front of  her as you see here as a distancing mechanism. He looks away from her.And please don’t write to tell me that this is based on one photo. It’s based on a lots of photos and a lot of video watching. Oftentimes just from one moment in time you can see the leakage of how a person really feels about someone.   

GEORGE WALKS OUT OF THE COURTROOM ALONE AND LEAVES CINDY BEHIND     

    

 Finally it  was time for  George and Cindy to leave the courtroom. They faced in opposite directions. He left her trailing  behind and didn’t even look back at her or speak to her.   

 As you can see in the above photo, his rounded shoulders  indicate that he has had to submit to being there even though he clearly did not want to be there at all. This photo and the ones preceeding it show that he clearly does not want to be around Cindy.   

  His expression mirrors how he feels inside. George is completely miserable and no doubt  feels stuck . Also note how he pulls his head away from Cindy. Once again, that is a distancing behavior.   

  Finally George left the courtroom and Cindy was standing there alone  by herself.   

 There is no doubt that this entire ordeal has taken it’s toll on their previously fragile relationship. Even though they have tried to put up a good public front in the past, as things become more stressful I believe it will put an even greater strain on them.   

GEORGE FACING THE GRIM REALITY FOR THE FIRST TIME IN TWO YEARS    

 A lot of this strain has to do with George coming out of the fog and finally facing reality. Casey’s accusations of him sexually molesting her, jolted him back into reality. 

  
  Whether it is true or not, he is now out of  his illusion concerning Casey. He sees her for exactly what she is. If he didn’t molest her, he sees her as the lying dangerous  monster that she is.  He may now clearly see her as killing Casey and now trying to kill him and his reputation with her lies .   If he did indeed sexually molest her, then he faces the grim  reality of realizing  how  his improper actions may have contributed  to Case’s aberrant  behaviors.     

 Either case is a very grim scenario. He can no longer look at Casey the same way. He can no longer sit there with a straight face and defend her to the hilt. He can no longer go on and on about a fictious Zanny the Nanny or try to use River Cruz as a cause for reasonable doubt.   

 For the first time George is feeling emotions other than  the grief  of losing the only person in his life who gave him a reason to wake up in the morning- little Caylee.  The emotional  veil has finally been lifted. So he has to be feeling  the anger and the rage  he has towards Casey fro taking away his precious grand daughter.   

Prior to this George was an emotionally vacant parent.  By his own admission told Casey he wasn’t a great father as he preety much let Casey do whatever she wanted to do. So now he is forced to live with that. Being emotionally vacant, he had no clue with what what really going on with Casey or who she really was as a person.  Now for the  first time in his life he has taken a close look at who  Casey really is and it is not a pretty picture. It is devastating for him and it shows in every aspect of his body language.   

My only hope for George is that he is seeing someone who is a licensed psychologist or a psychiatrist who can help him cope with what must be a living hell. He needs a lot of support from a professional who will be there to guide him properly during the roller coaster ride of the trial and it’s aftermath. He needs a professional in his corner to help him cope with the grim reality. That reality is that his own flesh and blood may be killed by having a neddle stuck through her own flesh as it’s poisons course through her own blood. 

www.drlillianglass.com   

   

 

Share on Facebook

Cindy Anthony’s Signals of Deception In The Courtroom- Says She Believes Caylee Still Alive

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

When Cindy Anthony took the stand and gave her testimony about the 911 call, she was articulate and  coherent. She presented  herself very well for the most part, until she lied that she still thinks Caylee is alive.

TOO MUCH INFORMATION MAY REVEAL DISCOMFORT ABOUT THE TOPIC AND GUILT

Cindy sounded very credible and  had it together until she discussed finding Casey’s pants in the car and  how she washed them because they smelled bad. That was too much information for the question asked.

When someone coughs up a little too much information it may very well be that they are feeling a bit guilty or uncomfortable concerning that information.

There is no doubt that Cindy, being the intelligent woman she appears to be, knows very well that she should not have washed Casey’s pants no matter how badly they smelled.

She needed to have placed them in a plastic bag and put them in a sealed container in the garage or some place where she would not smell the pants. She knows very well that it was wrong for her to  have washed them, especially after knowing that it smelled like a dead body in the car.

Perhaps she instinctively knew Casey was up to no good and had something to do with that smell.

That may be why she was so intent on washing away that  smell away as well as  washing away her guilt. There is no doubt that deep down Cindy feels guilty for  threatening to throw Casey out and keep Cayley. That precipitated this whole mess and she no doubt wished she had never said what she said to Casey or Caylee might still be alive .

You would think that Caylees backpack and toys ,which were in the heated car also smelled like the pants. So why didn’t she wash them as well? It was only Casey’s pants that she washed in her attempt to save and protect Casey. But what about protecting Caylee and her memory?

CINDY’S REAL TEARS

Unlike what we have seen regarding Casey’s fake non tears, Cindy cried real tears as she recalled the  events  and her frustration concerning Caylee’s disappearance.

 She broke down a bit when she told of how she overheard Casey tell her son Lee that she hadn’t seen Caylee in over 32 days and panicked how she panicked. As she relayed this story , it was a though she was re-living the experience. She lost her composure and wipes some real tears. And unlike Casey, she didn’t have to examine her Kleenex to make sure she cried tears. She also didn’t  stick her finger in her eyes or wipe away a tearless cheek as Casey repeatedly does.

THE AGGRESSIVE BLAMING  CINDY FINALLY  SURFACES

Cindy was actually like-able and believable until the topics of what she said to the FBI  and when she said that it smelled like there was a dead body in the car.  It was then  the old Cindy came through- the Cindy we watched for years on television during her press junkets, outside of her home, and in depositions. 

Once again we saw the aggressive angry aggressive defensive belligerent Cindy who has the nerve to blame the FBI stating that the  FBI got the transcript of what she said all wrong . She complains how there were lots of errors and missing pieces. 

So it appeared that Cindy couldn’t keep up her calm, cool, and collected demeanor for long. In a short period of time she was back to her unlikable self.

CINDY BELIEVES CAYLEE IS STILL ALIVE?

Then Jose Baez tries to Spin it during cross examination after Cindy the unlikable emerged. He couches it by making a statement and telling her how she felt. He says “ You wanted them to know that the smell was different from a dead body.”

Cindy is surprised to hear the words Jose has put into her mouth by telling her what she meant to say. That is why she shakes her head NO as she sheepishly says”I guess.”
 She knows that isn’t true. If it was she would have said “Exactly” or “That’s right” in a tone that showed conviction.

 Indicating she knows exactly what Jose is doing os ridiculous spin.

Then she realizes what  Baez is trying to do by putting those ridiculous words into her mouth.  It suddenly dawns on her that Jose is trying to spin it in an attempt  to  protect Casey.

So she adds additional unrequested information to  Baez’ nonsensical statement . Cindy adds a lie. Trying to direct Cindy’s answers to make them more favorable for Casey he makes another statement to Cindy instead of asking her a direct question.   Jose says “You told them this because you wanted them to keep searching for a live Caylee.”

Cindy clearly liked where this was going  as hooked on to the words “ live Casey.”  Jose senses tat she is getting where he is going and now asks her a question concerning his statement. He asks “Youre clear about that?”

Now here is where we see Cindy’s signals of deception. Of course she is “not clear about that.” Of course she knew after smelling the dead body smell  in the car, that the cops would not be searching for  a live Caylee but rather a dead Caylee.

Cindy immediately shakes her head NO as she replies”  absolutely”. Shaking your head in the negative when you are speaking in the affirmative is a sure fire signal that you’re not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing bur the truth. It may have been wishful thinking on Cindy’s part, But it was far from the truth. Deep down she knew what most likely happened.

 Remember what I said about people that add too much information that is unsolicited, I said they might be feeling guilt so they give too much information, They also give too much information to explain a lie away. 

The bones were discovered. The memorial service was held. The vigils were over. So there is no way that Cindy isn’t aware that Caylee is dead. But after she said  “absolutely” in response to Jose’s comment that she wanted police to search for a live Caylee, she adds unsolicited information.

 She adds “ I still think  Caylee is alive.” Immediately after she uttered those ridiculous words, she   shows  a signal of embarrassment as well as deception by  she pursing her lips. It as though she instinctively knew she should not have said what she did.

Then the rest of the signals of deception kick in. She shrugs her shoulders which is a definite signal of deception and cocks her head to the side indicting that she is not sure she should have gone that far and said  what she did in adding such a ridiculous comment to help create a reasonable doubt.

 .

 Then she makes a very goofy looking facial expression which reflects how she goofed up by making that  that outrageous  statement . Her eyes pop open wide and she tightens her lower lip and her upper lip as if to seal her mouth shut/ The pressure is so tight that it looks like she is puffing out the area above her upper lip ( moustache area )  as the color of her skin above her upper lip has blanched.

She remained in that position for 10 seconds. She didn’t want to say anymore because she knows she did this for affect and as a way to say something to try and help out Casey.

CASEY’S REACTION TO CINDY

For the most part Casey’s expression was lifeless when Cindy took the stand. There was no facial reaction to Cindy as she coldly looked through her mother. It was obvious that she wasn’t thrilled to see her mother full face looking straight in her direction after a two year absence.

LOOKING PRETTY FOR MAMMA

Cindy’s presence on the stand clearly made Casey feel uncomfortable and nervous. As soon as her mother got on the stand there were numerous  hair grooming behaviors which took place in succession . Subconsciously she wanted to look nice for  mamma Cindy. After all Cindy has indicated in her jailhouse letters to Casey, how beautiful she looks. So Casey’s sudden repeated  grooming is her attempt to “look beautiful” for Cindy. 

CASEY’S FURTHER DISCOMFORT

Casey’s discomfort with seeing and hearing her mother on the stand is reflected by Casey’s  swallowing more often than usual. This means that her  throat is dry because her autonomic  nervous system is kicking in. She’s not manufacturing enough saliva  so that is why her mouth and throat feel dry. Hence, the excessive swallowing. Her gaze was not steady when her mother spoke as she didn’t look directly at her. Instead we observed  constant eye shifting .Finally we saw her take many deep breaths to oxygenate herself. This is further indication of her physical discomfort. We  clearly saw it when the when the topic of Tony’s apartment came up. 

THANKS MOM

For the most part there was no significant emotion reflected n Casey’s face. But right after Cindy made the Caylee is still alive” comment there was a sudden change in Casey’s facial expression.  It was softer and she had a slight smile as if to say “thanks for saying that and trying to create reasonable doubt so I can walk out of here, like my attorney Cheney Mason said I would.

ADVICE FOR CINDY ON THE STAND

 think that no matter how much coaching or witness preparation Cindy gets the real Cindy will eventually leak out to jurors. Based on this little preview, it appears that she just can’t help herself. She needs to just answer the questions and not editorialize. She needs to not volunteer additional information especially information like thinking Caylee is still alive. If she pulls that nonsense on a jury they will think she is a nutcase and react even more harshly towards Casey. www.drlillianglass.com

 

Share on Facebook