Posts Tagged ‘psychology’

Paris Hilton’s Body Language in Latest Mug Shot Shows Confident Smug Smile That She Will Skirt Cocaine Charge Against Her

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

SMILING WITH CONFIDENCE

Paris Hilton who was recently arrested for cocaine possession is no stranger to arrests and mug shots. But unlike her previous mug shots, this time she did a her ¾ model like turn to the camera, tilted her head and gave a slight Mon-Lisa like closed lipped smile.

The smile spoke volumes. It wasn’t an overly happy excited smile with raised cheekbones. Instead it was a knowing smile. It was a smile that indicated all will work out for her in her favor and that she really didn’t have a care in the world. It said “ nothing will happen to me and I will get away with this just like I got away with my arrest this summer at the World Cup Match in South Africa in suspicion of marijuana.”

HIGH PRICED POWERFUL LAWYERS TO PARIS’ RESCUE

How couldn’t it world out well for her? After all there was more publicity to keep her relevant and on the front pages of the news. Paris’ facial expression indicated that she did not have a care in the world. It showed confidence the confidence of having a a high priced powerful and connected attorney who will very likely be able to get her off of this charge of cocaine possession on some sort of a technicality.

Unlike the average Joe who is caught with cocaine, unfortunately Paris gets to thumbs her nose up against the system and most likely walk away.

Apparently in Wynn security cameras filmed the Vegas police searching her handbag and putting her under arrest inside the security office of the Wynn Hotel in after arrested with her latest boyfriend Cy Waits after being pulled over by cops who smelled marijuana.

Instead of being arrested right away, Paris was taken into the Wynn’s security office where — as the Las Vegas Metro police put it — “it was discovered that Ms. Hilton had cocaine in her possession.” Then was she arrested.

Paris lawyer Vegas attorney David Chesnoff believes her arrest captured on tape, could help her tremendously as he will claim it was an illegal search, in part because she was taken away from the scene to this other location. Chesnoff will also be able to take apart every single thing that happened during the search and arrest because he’ll have the video to work off of.

So now there is a side show instead of the real issue of Paris having illegal drugs on her. Paris’ repeatedly claimed while she was being detained that the purse wasn’t hers. While the purse may not have been hers, was the cocaine hers? Perhaps a fingerprint analysis could determine that.

WILL PARIS’ NEW BEAU BE ABLE TO SKIRT THE LAW AS WELL?

Paris’ latest beau Cy Waits was also arrested , But he was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol where he could get up to a year in county jail.

But Waits’ also has a high powered attorney. His attorney said “”As the case proceeds, a lot of facts are going to come to light that will ultimately lead to exoneration.”

Let’s hope not. Let’s hope that justice is served and the message is sent out loud and clear that those who use and are caught with illegal drugs of any kind will have to suffer the consequences no matter how much money or fame they have.

WHERE IS THE MESSAGE OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO OUR YOUNG PEOPLE?

As you well know from reading my blogs I am disturbed by young women who are in the limelight like Paris who exhibit bad heavier and are subsequently rewarded for their bad behavior with millions of dollars, television shows etc. I do not like the message this give to our young women.

Young people need to know loudly and clearly that no matter who a person is or how much money they have, if they do something wrong they will be held accountable. They need to know that they can not get away with things. They need to be fully aware of the fact that they will not receive rewards for bad behavior or illegal actions.They need to know that Paris Hilton cannot be an exception to the rule. They need to see that she is treated as anyone else who breaks the law.

PARIS’ PREVIOUS EMPTY WORDS

After Paris spent only half of her 45 day sentence in a Los Angeles jail three years ago, she appeared on Larry King Live when she was released. On the show, she said her jail experience caused her to re-evaluate the role partying played in her life.

Perhaps she needs yet another jail sentence to help her further re-evaluate her priorities. Let’s hope that our young people don’t continue to get the message that all is not equal when doing the wrong thing and that there there is a different set of rules for the rich and famous. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: body langage expert, body language, body language analysis, cocaine possession, communicaiton expert, communication psychologist, Cy Waits, David Chesnoff, dr. lillian glass, Larry King Live, Las Vegas, Lilian Glass, Media Psychologist, PAris Hilton, Paris Hilton arrest, Paris Hilton arrested, Paris Hilton jail, Paris Hilton jail sentence, Paris Hilton marijuana arrest, psychology, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Celebrities, Criminal, body language | No Comments »

Dr. Lillian Glass Never Lies About What She Sees, Including Kate Gosselin and Bodyguard’s Body Language

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Oftentimes different magazine, internet, and television show venues will ask me what I think about a particular celebrity or newsmaker’s relationship. They will often present me with a series of photos or videos and ask for my assessment.

Most recently HollywoodLife. com asked me to comment on the relationship between Kate Gosselin and her bodyguard Steve Neild. I gave them my honest assessment based on various tells which I observed. This is only my opinion and my view. I did not personally hang out with Kate or Steve or witness their alleged coziness firsthand.

Apparently there have been documented reports of physical sightings where Kate and her body guard have become rather cozy with legs touching legs. In fact the esteemed Huffington Post reported it.

I stated in the Hollywoodlife.com blog that that Kate seemed to fancy her bodyguard based on her body language. Steve, on the other hand continued to show professional decorum as you can see in these photos below.

Apparently, the Kate Gosselin lovers and fans on their “Kate Plus Eight Gosselin Family Fansite” were all up in arms and got their panties in a bunch stating that I made up lies to promote myself and to insult Kate. This is not true.

In the first place, I do not need Kate Gosselin to promote myself. I have being doing body language analysis well before there was a Kate Gosselin in the media. As far as insulting Kate is concerned, it was never my thought or intention to insult Kate. I was merely describing my personal body language observations.

Here are some excerpts from the HollywoodLife.com article:

We told you earlier that Kate and longtime bodyguard Steve Neild got cozy while vacationing in Bald Head Island, N.C. during the week of Aug. 9. A shocking eyewitness report from The Huffington Post alleges that the duo were sitting side-by-side, legs touching, on the beach!

Photo #1: “Her head is cocked like she’s interest to know what Steve thinks. He is kind of in control here and she’s not used to that. Look at her toe, they are in sync step wise, and there’s one foot where her toe is facing him — she really likes him. Her shoulders are a little rounded and hunched over meaning she’s being a little subservient. The fact that his hands are in his pockets shows he’s hiding something like he’s hiding what’s going on between them.”

Photo #2: “Look at the way she’s looking at him. It’s like he’s her man servant and she can yell at him. Her foot is directly in the back of him and she’s looking at him like she’s trying to control him and tell him what to do. Kate’s legs are spread wide which means it’s very casual and very very comfortable with this guy … overly comfortable.”

Photo #3: “With her hand on the hip it’s kind of like an arrogant and defiant pose. Her shoulders are rounded again and she’s leaning into him. The distance between them is too close like he’s trying to keep it hidden and professional, but she’s giving it away. It appears in this photo that she likes him more than he likes her with the way he is facing.”

Photo #4: “Her face shows that she’s very happy around him. You never see Kate smile. She’s a step behind him and there’s not a lot of distance between them. They are also in sync again and that indicates she likes him. Again, he has a hand in his pocket which reveals he’s hiding something.

It’s definitely possible they are having an affair. She’s very comfortable around him.”

“POSSIBLE” MEANS POSSIBLE

Notice that I said the word “possible”, I didn’t say they were 100 per cent having an affair , I said “possible”.

Whether you love Kate or not you have to admit that anything is possible, especially when people spend as much time around one another as these two apparently do, with reported adjoining rooms in hotel stays.

I am not saying they are or they are not having an affair as I am not in their room. But I will say that they do look rather cozy in my view.’’

TELLING THE TRUTH AND CLEARING UP FALSE MISCONCEPTIONS AND MISINFORMATION

As a result of this article many Kate supporters, didn’t bother to read what I said exactly but instead, blindly went off half cocked. They looked at a headline which I did not write and made many comments where they tried to minimize my background and education in an attempt to dismiss what I had to say in order to make themselves feel better.

So I decided to address and clarify their issues so there would be no misunderstandings.

Being an open person with nothing to hide, I will address the concerns and comments from the Kate loving fans so they can rest easy.

What I do in body language analysis has nothing to do with neurolinguistic programming. Body language analysis is both and art in having experience in knowing how to read others and a science based on research concerning specific behaviors which indicate specific meaning.

2. Kate’s alleged “pigeon toedness” that a commenter suggested was not a factor in describing her body language tells with Steve Neild

3. As far as any comments I made regarding the Gosselin kids are concerned, when Jon and Kate were going through their split up, I was a proponent of their speaking with a counselor to help them with the transition, especially since the divorce was so public, ugly and tense.

Kate even publicly stated how it was difficult for the kids and how the kids were acting out at the time. I believed and still believe that seeking the advice of a licensed professional that specializes in treating children who appear to be acting out or undergoing stress, can only help a child.

4. As for my background, I am more than happy to share it with you. I am not a medical doctor – an MD. I do have a PhD in Communication Disorders from the University of Minnesota and a Masters Degree from the University of Michigan in Speech communication. I also have a strong background in the study of psychology although I am not a practicing or licensed psychologist. I have a post doctorate in Medical Genetics from UCLA where I was the only PhD in an MD program where I closely examined structures and behaviors related to specific genetic disorders. My training in this field has been instrumental in terms of my developing my body language reading skills.

I have spent close to three decades doing communication and body language analysis not only for my clients in my private practices, but for the Hollywood community for various films and television shows, as well as using my skills in the law enforcement and legal communities. I have also written numerous books on the topic and lectured around the world.

5. As far as being a Kate Hater is concerned, I do not hate Kate as I have said repeatedly. In fact, I respect that she has numerous mouths to feed and has found a way to earn a living in the media to support her children. I believe that she is indeed very lucky to have a guardian angel like TLC to support her and her family.

6.And finally, I have discovered is that there are lot of Kate fans or shall I say “fanatics” who cannot bear to hear anything they may perceive as negative when it may in fact not be negative at all. To them, I say, take off your blinders and look at what” is”, not at what is the fantasy you created there to be.

If Kate is having an affair with her bodyguard, that is her business. Maybe they spent so much time together and found they had a lot in common. Maybe they fell in love. Maybe he fell out of love with his wife. Maybe he has an open marriage. Only Steve and Kate know this for sure.

Like everyone else, Kate certainly deserves love. As I said anything is “possible.” While it is possible that they are an item, it is also “possible”It is also “possible” that they are just very cozy close intimate friends. Only time will tel for sure.www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: affair with Kate Gosselin and bodyguard, body language analysis, body language expert, communication expert, communication psychologist, dr. lillian glass, Gosselin children, Gosselin fans, HollywoodLife.com, Kate Gosselin bodyguard, Kate Gosslin, Kate Plus Eight Gosslin Family Fansite, lillian glass, Media Psychologist, psychologist, psychology, Steve Neild
Posted in Celebrities, Reality Shows, body language | No Comments »

Craigslist Killer Commits Suicide in Jail. Body Language Signals of Psychopathic Behavior May Have Been Ignored By Ex Fiance

Monday, August 16th, 2010

It comes as no surprise to me that Craigslist Killer medical student Philip Markoff finally did himself in. According to reports he put plastic bag over his head and smothered himself to death as well as cutting an artery so he would bleed to death.

When he was first arrested and put into custody, there were reports that he constantly picked at himself until he bled. In fact eyewitnesses stated that Markoff “started to pick at his ear” the day his Megan McAlister fiance at time visited him in jail.

His self mutilating body language spoke volumes. But what about his body language signals when he was dating and engaged to Megan? did they speak volumes as well or did Megan ignore them?

BODY LANGUAGE OF SELF MUTLIATION AS AN EMOTIONAL REACTION TO GETTING CAUGHT

Markoff’s picking at himself until he bled was a form of self mutilation. Because he was caught and finally trapped , it was a body language tell that indicated that he was punishing himself and displaying his self loathe for getting caught.

Markoff was so arrogant and thought he was so brilliant and clever at figuring out his brilliant plan to make an easy buck. He answered Craigslist ads placed by those engaged in offering sexual messages or services and robbed them. He was sure they wouldn’t protest or report him. After all, they were doing something illegal as well and didn’t want to get themselves in trouble by reporting illegal acts they were committing.

But when they protested, he killed them like he did with 26 yer old Juiana Brisman. Police found lots of evidence-panties he collected from his apartment from his victims along with plastic handcuffs, and a hollowed out Grey’s Anatomy book containing a gun- his murder weapon.

So when he was caught, he was bright enough to know that there was absolutely no way out. His self mutilation and self punishment reflects his anger at himself for not being so brilliant and for getting caught. This lead to his ultimate self punishment of killing himself. Because he was devoid of emotion as most psychopaths are, his emotional distress was revealed in his body picking.

He knew what lay ahead of him. So he took the easy way out and saved the state time and money and did the job himself. So now there is one less Toxic Man among us.

BODY LANGUAGE OF SHOCK

One of the significant body language tells that can be observed with Markoff can be seen when he was in the courtroom. He showed absolutely no emotion. His face was stoic and he barely moved .

Emotionally, through his facial expressions and body language , he showed a lack of remorse and a lack of guilt. This is very indicative of those with antisocial personality disorders. There was also no question that he was in shock when first capture , much like another very tall, intelligent and handsome fellow who allegedly killed several young women- Joran d er Sloot.

What these two miscreants have in common is that they were so arrogant and full of themselves and thought so highly of their own intelligence that they never thought they would ever get caught. So when they did get caught they were in complete physical shock. This dramatically showed in their bosy and facial language.

CHILLING COLDNESS IN BODY LANGUAGE OF MARKOFF

What was most chilling to discover was how security cameras showed Markoff casually strolling to and from the three different crime scenes as he used his Blackberry. He showed the same psychopathic casualness that Joran van der Sloot showed in his body language. when he calmly walked out of the hotel room carrying his bags, while he left a mutilated dead woman inside his hotel room.

It seems that their demeanor isn’t the only thing these two had in common. They both robbed killed women for money to help support their gambling debts and habits. They had no sympathy or remorse for their victims and were able to continue on in their lives as though nothing happened.

MARKOFF’S SICK MESSAGE TO EX FIANCE MEGAN MCCALISTER

There is no doubt that Markoff thought about killing himself the whole time he has been incarcerated. But he chose to commit the act on the date of his would be first wedding anniversary. To me this is clear a shout out to Megan, a beautiful young and intelligent woman, who also wanted to become a doctor hersself, who had no clue about him or the double life he was leading.

Perhaps his suicide on the date of their failed wedding was a sick and depraved message to Megan in order to one last time create pain and emotional havoc in someone’s life.

It was clear from her statements to the press and statements through her attorney after Markoff was arrested that Megan had no idea who her fiance was or what he was doing in his spare time- robbing and killing. She wrote in her email to the press:

Unfortunately you were given wrong information as was the public. All I have to say to you is Philip is a beautiful person inside and out and could not hurt a fly! A police officer in Boston (or many) is trying to make big bucks by selling this false story to the TV stations. What else is new?? Philip is an intelligent man who is just trying to live his life so if you could leave us alone we would greatly appreciate it. We expect to marry in August and share a wonderful, mean‘I will stand by Philip as I know he is innocent.

And in a message to a reporter on a social networking site she said the following :
‘Philip is a beautiful man inside and out. ‘He is intelligent, loyal, and the best fiance a woman could ask for. He would not hurt a fly!’

But were her words true? Did she really believe her words? The answer is probably. Perhaps he only showed her his good side. On the other hand, perhaps there were signals all along but Megan may have been too blinded by a planning a lavish wedding and a future with a bright doctor. The question is were there signs early on that could have clued Megan in to the fact that her fiancé was living a double life? The answer is YES!

RED FLAG SIGNALS EX FIANCE MEGAN MCCALISTER MAY HAVE IGNORED

As any forensic psychiatrist will tell you, once you decide to burrow deep beneath the surface you will discover that this abberant behavior did not happen over night. They were there when he was a child. The fact that he refused to make eye contact with his parents when they sat in the courtroom also seems to speak volumes. They no doubt knew early on that something was off with their son which they may have chosen to ignore.

Perhaps they felt that now that he was going to get married he would finally straighten out. But they were wrong. When he told his parent to forget about him after they visited him in jail, it said it all.

There may have also been symptoms of Philip Markoff’s psychopathy that were evident that Megan McCalister also ignored or refused to see.

One of the nost telling things in psychopathic behavior is the emotional detachment. You can actally see it in their engagement photo. While he is smiling with Megan, she is the one lovingly nuzzling into him. He on the other hand has a masklike smile and doesn’t embrace her arm. Instead he awkwardly positions the front of his hand against her elbow. He doesn’t lean into her or embrace her. Granted this is only one photo.

But when we examine another photo of the two of them in a more casual setting, we see the same pattern. She is nuzzling and leaning into him and he is so detached, he even has one of his hands behind his back as though he has something to hide, which he did- his secret life. Again you do not see him embracing her or showing signals of affection towards her.

Megan may have rationalized that Philip wasn’t the affectionate type or didn’t like public displays of affection. But when two people are about to marry, there should be a lot of mutual displays of affection. But were there other signs?

1. Did he lack sensitivity?

2. Was he cunning and manipulative?

3. Did he show a lack of remorse or guilt?

4.Did she catch him in lies?

5. Dis she think he was callous and lacked sympathy?

6. Did she notice that he was full of himself all the time with a grandiose sense of self worth?

7. Dis she notice a glibness and a superficial charm?

8. Did he always seem to blame others and not accept responsibility for his actions?

9. Did he seem to have a shallow affect

In retrospect, I have no doubt that Megan could answer YES to many or all of these questions.

These are the signs of someone who exhibits psychopathic or socipathic behavior. In fact I discuss this is greater detail in my new book which will be coming out in November 2010 called TOXIC MEN- 10 Ways to Identify, Deal With, and Heal From men Who make Your Life Miserable which you may pre order by clicking below:

http://www.amazon.com/Toxic-Men-Ways-Identify-Miserable/dp/144050007X

If Megan chose to ignore these red flags, it is understandable. After all, they met doing something that was selfless and good for the sake of others. They were both hospital volunteers when they were in college. So she saw Markoff as a good person who does good for others. The fact that he was in medical school and intent on becoming a doctor continued to confirm to her that he was a good person and out to help others.

She also thought the guy from a good family, seeing that his father was a respected dentist. As a doctor, they had wouldn’t have financial worries. They were planning a big wedding and she was ready to start her life with him. She didn’t want to believe that there was anything wrong with him or wrong with their realtionship.

That is why after he was picked up on I 95 while they were in the car tohether and then they were separated in two police cars where Philip was taken into custody and Megan was released, it is understandable why she vehemently proclaimed that there must have been some mistake.

But Megan’s story teaches us a great deal. We must be vigilant. We must look for these red flag signals and never ignore them or hope they go away or change. They cannot change.

We cannot be blinded by what we want to see and not what is actually there or wish was not there. Based on Markoff’s body language towards Megan in the above photos what was not there was a lot of open affection. That may have been indicative of his inability to have anything other than a detached emotional interaction with another person. It may have been the first red flag of psychopathic behavior. Megan is lucky that she didn’t end up a victim like Juliana Brisman. This could have easily happened if she married him. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: anti social behavior, body language, body language analysis, body language of shock, body language signals, Craigslist Killer, craigslist murderer, Dealing With and Heakinbg From en Who Make Your ife Miserable www.drlillianglass.com, Dealing With and Healing From Men WHo Make You Miserable, dr. lillian glass, edia psychology, Joran can der Sloot, Lilian Glass, Megan McCalister, Philip MArkoff, psychology, psychopath, psychopath body language, psychopathology, psychopaths, self mutalation, similarities between Craigslist Killer and Joran van der Sloot, suicide, Toxci Men, Toxic Men 10 Ways of Identifying
Posted in Criminal, body language | No Comments »

Naomi Campbell’s body language of fear on the witness stand. Was she lying or telling the truth?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Based on what she now reported during her testimony at the Hague, it is clearly evident that Naomi Campbell was not telling the truth when she was interviewed by ABC reporters months earlier. During that time, she said that she never received a diamond. As she said this, she showed signals of deception by breaking eye contact and looking down.

When she was probed further by the reporter and asked if she was brought diamonds, she turned her head and looked away and refused to answer.

Then in typical Naomi Campbell fashion, she abruptly got out of her seat and apparently kicked the ABC camera on her way out.

But when she appeared at the Hague and took the stand in the trial against Charles Taylor, did she continue to lie or was she telling the truth? Below are some of her communication and body language signals when she was asked key questions about Charles Taylor and the diamonds.

Her hair was pulled up and back and she was dressed in a demure conservative ivory colored sweater with matching blouse and skirt. What was interesting was that the jewelry she wore around her neck . It was an amulet in the same of an eye, which is worn in many countries by people to defect the evil eye or superstitiously prevent any harm to come to that person.

In this photo Naomi is asked if Mr. Taylor had conversations with her specifically. As she says that she did not speak to him, she breaks eye contact and looks down. This behavior is often associated with a signal deception.

She was then asked if anything happened after she went to her room. In this photo we can see that she is wide eyes which shows fear and tightly pursing her lips together, indicating that she doesn’t want to tell everything happened.

You can see the muscle tension around her upper lip and chin which indicates that she desperately wants to keep quiet. Her wide eyed looked indicates that she appears to be afraid to speak.

She is then asked, Did you ever learn who these gifts were from. She says “No” and looks up and away, which indicates a signal of deception as to whether she may have indeed known who the gift of a diamond was from.

A shoulder shrug is one of the key “tells” when it comes to determining whether someone is telling the truth or not. In this case, Naomi is relaying a story where she said that Ms. Farrow or Ms. White said that the diamonds must have come from Charles Taylor. After she makes this statement,you can see a definite shoulder shrug as she also breaks eye contact and looks down and lowers her head. These are other signals often seen in deception as well.

When Naomi tells the court that she put the pouch she received on the table and didn’t look at it until the next morning, you can see some additional signals of deception as she lowers her head, looks away, shuts her eyes and purses her lips. This is clearly indicative of her not wanting to talk about what happened. With regard to her answer, to me she does not appear to be forthright.

It also doesn’t make sense to have people come to your door with a pouch and immediately place it on the table and not look at it, even if you were abruptly awakened. It seems that most people would be curious to know what someone gave them, especially after they made the effort of suddenly awakening coming to the door, and then taking something that they were handed.

They even asked her if she asked what she was given when these men came to her door. She said “No”. Once again you can see the fear in her face as she gives her answer.

Here she says she just took it and said thank you but she shakes her head “No” as she relays this testimony. When someone’s body language is incongruous with what they say, this is a red flag in terms of whether or not they may be telling the truth.

For many, it would be hard to believe that someone would come to your door and you would just take a package and not ask who it was from or what was in the package.

The judge then probed as to whether the men said why they were bringing her the pouch and she said “No”. But her body language “tells” spoke volumes as you can see here. She broke eye contact looked down and there appeared to be considerable tension in her face.

To me, it also makes no sense that people would come to your room to deliver something to you and not tell you who it is from or what was inside of the package you were given.

When a person cocks their head to the side, it is often an indication that they aren’t sure, or they are not telling the truth. In this case, Naomi said that “they were very small and dirty stones.” She also purses her lips to indicate that she doesn’t care to say more.

The head cock tell is very significant, especially when it comes to determining whether or not she was telling the truth about the diamonds she received.

There appears to be conflict between this statement and what Mia Farrow said Naomi reported to her about having received a big diamond. Could Naomi have been given little dirty diamonds and one big diamond, like the one she allegedly told Mia Farrow about? Was she minimizing the facts by stating that they were they were simply “dirty little stones?”

Apparently, it was reported that when the charity records were verified, it seemed that Naomi Campbell did not donate the diamonds to Nelson Mandela’s charity like she said she was planning to do. Allegedly it was discovered that she made several checks in the amount of $50,000 to the charity and they had no record of receiving the diamonds from her.

Naomi may have also been cocking her head, which often indicates that a person isn’t sure of something to indicate that she isn’t sure that she wanted to say more.

There is no question that Naomi was in a precarious position. She attended a dinner for Nelson Mandela. She was no doubt exchanging pleasantries or briefly speaking with Charles Taylor at that dinner. I do believe that there is truth in what she said about putting her attention on her Nelson Mandela.

If she did indeed speak with Charles Taylor, most likely, she was not aware of his politics or his nefarious dealings. A s super model she may have been invited to this charitable event to add her beauty and public stature to the ambiance. I seriously doubt they got into a heavy discussion about his political dealings and about how his diamonds were obtained or what he was financing with those diamonds.

I have no doubt that Charles Taylor and every other man int he room was captivated by Naomi’s beauty and charm. Charles Taylor no doubt wanted to score some points with Naomi.

So he had his associates deliver some diamonds to her room. It makes common sense that those who delivered the diamonds would say who they were from or what they were. I can only assume that Naomi knew that these diamonds were a gift from Charles Taylor when she took the package, and thought nothing of it. Perhaps she wanted to donate them to charity but didn’t get around to it.

Perhaps she told Mia Farrow and Ms White that she got the diamonds as a gift that evening in order to impress her. I doubt that Mia Farrow or Ms. White, Naomi’s agent would have told her who the diamond or diamonds were from. It seems more reasonable that Naomi told them that she received a gift from Charles Taylor.

Then the whole thing blew up into a major event with Charles Taylor on trial at the Hague. This was no doubt intimidating for her as it would be for anyone. There may have possibly been been threats or warnings to her based on her telling Oprah during an interview that she feared for the safety of her family. There is one thing for certain. Naomi was frightened on the stand.

www.drlillianglass.com

\

Share on Facebook

Tags: body, body language, body language analysis, Charles Taylor, Charles Taylor trial, communicaiton psychologist, diamonds, dr. lillian glass, lillian glass, Media Psychologist, Mia Farrow, Naomi Campbell, Nelson Mandela, psychology, The Hague, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Celebrities, body language | 1 Comment »

Lee Anthony, Accused of Sexual Molestation By Sister Casey, Exhibits Inappropriate Behaviors on Witness Stand Mouthing “I Love You” to Sister

Monday, July 19th, 2010

CINDY’S STUNT IN THE COURTROOM SAYING CAYLEE IS STILL ALIVE WON’T WORK AT TRIAL

It was hard enough to stomach Cindy Anthony lying through her teeth as she told Jose Baez and the world that she believed Caylee was still alive as a lame attempt to save Casey’s worthless hide by trying to instill reasonable doubt.

Has premature senility set in? Doesn’t she remember that Caylee’s bones were found along with her skull that still had light brown hair attached to it? Doesn’t she remember that there was duct tape across Caylee’s dismembered head? Perhaps Jose Baez needed to show her the photos of dead Caylee’s duct taped skull to refresh her memory .Then she wouldn’t act like the TOXIC person she appears to be, in trying to manipulate a potential jury.

I can assure you that when a jury is present and she tries to pull this stunt, the prosecution will be all over her. They will ask her why she had a memorial that she alone organized if Caylee was still alive? One does memorials for dead people not for people who are still alive.

There certainly are people who are in such denial they may still believe a granddaughter was still alive when she wasn’t. Their body language and voice and speech patterns would reflect this. Cindy is clearly not one of these people. She knew exactly what she was doing on the stand. She was too coherent, too articulate, too precise, too together, and too knowledgeable to pull off this ridiculous stunt she tried to do.

LEE’S BEHAVIOR WAS REPREHENSIBLE!

But to next watch Lee Anthony act like a complete buffoon was equally if not more appalling. His attempts to be cutesy and funny and loveable were nauseating. But even more nauseating was the disrespectful and inappropriate stunt he get go.

Also don’t the male Anthony’s own a tie and a pair of nice slacks? When people know they are going to be testifying in a court of law, they usually dress in something a lot more respectable than a pair of old worn, stained blue jeans and an untucked golf shirt as you see above. Lee looked like a complete slob in my view. A jury will not respond well to Lee and his attire has a lot to do with it. I am surprised that his attorney didn’t give him some tips on how to dress in the courtroom.

His disrespect in the courtroom was also evidenced from the get go as he pointed both fingers in front of him as he was confused as to where to go in terms of getting on the witness stand.

He needed to quietly ask his attorney and not rudely point and shuffle. His walk to the stand was a cocky one. He literally bounced to the stand .He seemed overly self confident and overly full of himself at that point, which was a first impression turn off.

WHAT DID HE SAY??? “I LOVE YOU” TO A SISTER HE ALLEGEDLY SEXUALLY MOLESTED?

Then he had the audacity to mouth the words “I LOVE YOU” to his sister Cayleee. This is the same sister who told Jesse Grund her former fiance that at her brother Lee sexually molested her.

This is also the same sister who told a fellow inmate that her brother sexually molested her. Perhaps you believe that she may have told her fellow inmate this on purpose to help her case. Perhaps you may feel that Casey thought in case her letters became public, the sexual molestation excuse would be a solid reason as to why she allegedly killed Caylee.

But the fact that she told Jesse Grund very early on about Lee’s sexual abuse convinces me that something sexual may very well happened between Casey and her brother. I have a lot of respect for the Grund family and I believe that Jesse was telling the truth to law enforcement with respect to what Casey shared with him about Lee.

If Lee did sexually molest her and now tells her how much he loves her on the stand it is beyond sickening to me. The prosecutor was equally sickened as she wanted to bring what he did to the attention of the court. She cleaverly said ” I take it that that wasn’t meant for me?”

Instead of saying, ”No” and feeling embarrassed about what he did, he bellows out in a loud tone”No definately not.”

It was completely disrespectful. Since Judge Perry runs such a strict and tight ship I am surprised he did not admonish Lee for this and warn him not to have personal communication with the defendant.

LEE’S DISRESPECT TOWARDS CHENEY MASON

Cheney Mason attempted to make light of his hearing problems and hearing aids as an attempt to let people know he is hearing impaired. He did it in order to diffuse any embarrassment in case he was not able to catch every word the witness may say. By bringing it out in the open he was also letting the witness know that he may ask them to repeat their answer if he doesn’t catch what they say the first time around.

The hearing aid issue appeared to be an issue with regard to microphone feedback as a humming noise was heard periodically. Cheney made light of it as he mentioned that he couldn’t believe two hearing aid batteries could cause that much static.

The information Cheney Mason revealed was NOT meant to be thrown back at him in the form of a joke.

So when Lee wasn’t focused on what Cheney asked him he didn’t remember what Cheny had asked him. . Instead of politely asking Cheney to repeat the question, he tried to be cutesy and funny and says that there is static in his ears. He then laughed at his own joke.

Lee’s behavior was disrespectful and inappropriate. He was completely out of line. His behavior would definitely NOT endear him to any jury. During the trial Lee needs to cut the cutesy funny guy routine if he is intent on trying to save his sister from the lethal needle. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: body language blog, body language expert, bosy language, bosy language anlaysis, Casey Anthony accuses Lee Anthony of sexual molestation, Cheney Mason, Cindy Anthony, communicaiton expert, dr. lillian glass, Grund Family, hearing aid feedback, Jesse Grund, Jose Baez, Lee Anthony, Lee Anthony sexually molesting Casey Anthony, lillian glass, Media Psychologist, psychologist, psychology, sexual molestation, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Criminal, body language | 1 Comment »

George Anthony Continues to Play Martyr In His Letter to Casey But Remains “Mum” or “Num” on Whether He Sexually Molested

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Her

George’ Anthony’s letter written to Casey two months ago, after Casey confided to fellow inmate Robin Adams that her father and brother Lee sexually molested her, communicates a great deal about George and his relationship with his daughter.

WALKING ON EGGSHELLS WITH “CASEY MARIE”

In his jailhouse visit early on, we heard George refer to Casey as “Gorgeous” which I have always found inappropriate. But in this letter of two months ago , her refers to her by her full name “Casey Marie” indicating that he is less than pleased with her . I cannot recall that he has ever publicly called her by her entire name. Using her entire name indicates that he is clearly angry with her, for perhaps revealing their family secret.

He starts the letter with “Where do I begin?” This statement indicates that he is at a loss for words and does not know how to approach Casey with what he is about to tell her. His tentative approach also reflects how he continues to walk on eggshells around Casey as he has for years.

Instead of getting right to it and writing something like “Casey, how dare you lie about your brother and I sexually molesting you !”, he gives a meek and hesitant initial statement. George’s timid behavior continues with his uses of the next word “Well” instead of jumping right into what he really wants to say.

In leaving out the word “I” and just writing “met with Jose and Cheney Mason”, he doesn’t want to attribute what he is about to write to himself because it is understandably embarrassing and shameful for him. So subconsciously, he eliminates himself by eliminating “I” at the beginning of the sentence .

A DATE TO REMEMBER

He then says that he met with “Jose and Cheny Mason on Wednesday, March 24^th . ” By giving the exact date, he is being more formal and putting a distance between himself and Casey. In essence he is documenting exact the date as one that is memorable. He also mentions the date twice in his letter.

Perhaps this date may turn out to be very memorable for him if indeed it was the date that Casey betrayed family confidences. Remember how George always talked about family loyalty and how Lee and Casey spoke about keeping their secrets during the jailhouse tapes? If this is the case, it is no wonder as to why George is so upset.

GEORGE SEEMS TO HAVE MORE RESPECT FOR “CHENEY MASON THAN “JOSE”

George doesn’t respect attorney Jose Baez as much as he does Cheney Mason as he refers to him as “Jose” while he refers to “Cheny Mason” by his entire first and last name. This indicates that he has more respect for him. He does this twice as he says “Jose” in “Chaney’s” office delivered me heartbreaking news & ask me 2 heartbreaking questions?

I should also add that if you look at George’s handwriting in his letter in the photo above , you will see that it slants downward. When this occurs it usually means that the person is depressed and upset.

“HEARTBREAKING” INSTEAD OF “SHOCKING”?

George’s use of the word “heartbreak” twice seemed like an odd choice of a word to use. Does it imply that his heart was broken about her revelation that Lee and George molested her? Using words like “upsetting” “devastating” “disgusting” or “shocking” news make more sense in this case. Likewise “shocking,” unbelievable” surprising” “outrageous” “unconscionable” questions would make make sense than using the term heartbreaking questions.

In my view one is heartbroken when they feel betrayed. One is shocked and surprised and flabbergasted if someone made an accusation about then that they heard for the first time and it was not true.

PASSIVE AGRESSIVELY ADMONISHING CASEY

Then George passively aggressively admonishes Casey by saying “You know what 2 questions he asked and I said mum…..”

George’s response is hugely telling. He doesn’t tell her what the heartbreaking news is in his letetr, but we can imagine that the two possible questions were “Did brother Lee and or George sexually molest Casey, like she said they did in her jailhouse letters.

MUM ???n or NUM UNDERLINED

It is confusing as to whether George meant to say that he was numb and left off the final b offf , “num” or he meant to say mum.

The fact that George wrote he was “mum” or num is no doubt because he was between a rock and a hard place. Even if he was numb, he was mum.

If he answered “yes”, then he could go to jail for sexually molesting his underage daughter at the time. If he answered “yes” the defense (Jose Baez and Cheney Mason) could use that information as an argument and excuse as to why “poor” Casey may have allegedly murdered her daughter.

If he says “no” then the defense can’t use it as an excuse and it validates Casey’s sociopathic personality as a liar- that she would lie about her own father and brother sexually molesting her.

So, he remained “mum.” This word was underlined for emphasis which indicates that he most likely plans to remain mum on the subject if he is indeed referring to Casey’s accusing him and Lee of sexual molestation.

But I can assure you that during his deposition and during cross examination by the State, there is no way he will be able to continue to remain “mum” on these particular accusations which Casey made.

10 WHYS?????????

Then he continues in his passive aggressive way, to admonish Casey as he asks a series of questions where he repeats the word “why” twice for emphasis and to no doubt elicit a reaction of guilt in Casey.

He does this as he asks her why she would bring down every member of her family. There are 8 “whys” and two additional ones throughout his letter.

The only problem is that sociopaths have no feelings of guilt. So his efforts are wasted on asking her why? Casey, like all sociopaths have no idea why they do what they do. They are impulsive and never consider the implications of their actions.

SHAME AND EMBARRASSMENT FOR GEORGE

George is understandably upset and embarrassed that Casey accused him and Lee of sexually molesting her. That is why he possibly can’t even bring himself to write those words.

Instead he writes:

Why, Why also destroy Lee…
Why, Why also destroy Mom…
Why, Why also destroy me, your family…
Why, Why also destroy Caylee Marie…

If he and Lee didn’t molest Casey, why wasn’t he more direct? Most people would have adamantly and angrily defended themselves and have written something “ How dare you accuse your brother and father of molesting you when you know that never happened!” They would have been more direct and not sidestep the issue as George has apparently done in this letter if indeed he is indeed referring to her accusations.

If this is the case, then in using all those WHY’S George really saying, “WHY did you spill the beans and tell all the family secrets?” The fact that he did not angrily defend himself and deny what Casey accused him and Lee of doing to her leads to a lot of questions about whether Casey is finally telling the truth about something.

After all she spilled the beans in a jailhouse letter to her then girlfriend Robin Adams. I doubt she knew that this information would be made public. In my view, she is not that bright to plan this. It just happened. If Robin would not have revealed those letters or destroyed them, no one would know about these allegations which Casey made against Lee and George.

I have no doubt that after Casey read all those “why’s” , she may have derived some sadistic pleasure in knowing that her actions upset not only George and Lee, but also her mother, Cindy, her nemesis.

It is interesting that George adds Caylee Marie into the mix as he knows quite well that Casey Marie most likely has already destroyed Caylee Marie.

GEORGE LAYING A GUILT TRIP ON DEAF EARS AND ACTING THE MARTYR

We have all seen George act out the martyr in his exclusive Fox 35 interview months back. He’s still at acting the martyr in this letter as he also tries to guilt trip Casey by writing:

“After all I have tried, sacrificed, continued
to have you, My Daughter, Why???
Continually coming to court, continually
wanting to see you, Why???

What he’s essentially telling her is that he has sacrificed so much for her by showing up in the courtroom for her. He mentions the word “continually” twice for emphasis to let her know that he never let up and was loyal in coming to court because he wanted to see her.

With his two question marks following the “why” he is essentially asking her “why” he even bothered to do that if she that if she was going to “out” him and make accusations not only about him but Lee as well.

It can also mean “ Casey why would you not be loyal to me when I have been loyal to you and showed up in court for you continually?”

IS GEORGE LEAKING OUT INFORMATION WHEN HE SAYS “ CONTINUED TO HAVE YOU or LOVE YOU , MY DAUGHTER?”

Just as there is confusion whne George wote num or mum, there is also confusion as to whehter wrote have or loveWhen George writes “continued to have you, My Daughter,” If he meant to say have, I found that to be a rather strange choice of words.” Is he leaking out some information that he continued to have his daughter sexually? If he used the word love, it may or may not mean the same thing, Exactly what is George saying here?

MORE PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE ADMONISHING WHICH MUST THRILL SADISTIC CASEY

Again, George tries to passive aggressively admonish Casey by asking “Why” and adding three question marks next to it for emphasis ???.

Little does George know that his doing this, no doubt thrills Casey. If she heard George speak those words it would be music to her ears. But since she is reading it, the words are music to her eyes. It demonstrates that she got to George. Sociopaths love it when they get an emotional rise out someone. It mskes them smile.

Remember in the jailhouse tapes when Casey was smiling sadistically and laughing at Cindy when Cindy was crying and she remarked to her father about Cindy, “What is this one crying about?”

Did George continually show up in court out of his own guilt? Was George’s suicide attempt due to the overwhelming guilt he may have felt about what Casey allegedly said he did to her?

As we lean more and more from the letters, we can see that the pieces of the puzzle are coming together and giving us a clearer picture of this horribly and sadly dysfunctional family. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: body language, body language analysis, Caylee Marie Anthony, Cheney Mason, Cindy Anthony, communication expert, Communication Patterns, dr. lillian glass, Geirge Anthony, George Anthony handwriting, George Anthony letter, George Anthony letter to Casey, graphology, Jose Baez, Lee Anthony, lillian glass, Media Psychologist, psychology, Robin Adams, sexual molestation. Casey Marie Anthony, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Communication Patterns, Criminal | 3 Comments »

Joran Van der Sloot’s Body Language- His Moist Eyes Don’t Show Remorse or Sadness But His Stunned Look Shows How He Did Not Expect To Get Caught

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

Any moist eyes you see on Potential serial killer, Joran Van de Sloot, (and I use the term potential serial killer because the definition of a serial killer is having three or more killings under their belt and in Joran’s case there are only two of which we know) are not tears of remorse or sadness .

Instead, they are tears which reveal his body’s adrenalin rush in both the shock and excitement over the new situation where he is the focus of being captured for killing a young Peruvian woman, Stephanie Flores .

In fact that is why it has been reported that Joan looked stunned. He is no doubt in complete shock that he was caught. His narcissism would never allow him to imagine what the consequences would be if this happened to him.

The tears are due to his autonomic nervous system essentially taking over and expelling tears in his system. The reason I say this is because serial killers and would be serial killers have no emotion. They do not feel the same things as we who are not serial killers feel. They shallow affect, lack of empathy, incapacity for love, and a definite lack of guilt or remorse. In essence Joran is not at all capable of normal emotions in relation to situational appropriate events.

BAD BODY LANGUAGE SIGNS FROM THE GET GO

When you look at the photo of Joran Van Der Sloot at the front desk to pick up his room key after a long night out with Ms. Flores in tow, there is the exact same sadistic smirk that he had when he told an undercover reporter that he killed another young woman, Natalie Holloway him several years back.

The fact that Joran is walking in front of Ms. Flores and doesn’t acknowledge her in the surveillance tapes is not a good sign. It shows a detachment from her.

He doesn’t even look at her when he enters his room with her which is also a bad sign as it shows he doesn’t care about her. There is not politeness of gentlemanly consideration of letting her enter the room ahead of him.

Once again it speaks to his extreme egocentric and narcissistic behavior ,which most psychopaths demonstrate.

CALM COOL AND COLLECTED AFTER LEAVING A MURDERED BODY IN THE ROOM

If you look at this surveillance photo of Joran leaving the hotel room 4 hours after he allegedly killed this young woman as he is dressed in a fresh set of clothes, his demeanor shows a calmness. There is no muscle tension in his face whatsoever.

There is even that sick smirk on his face that we saw when he admitted killing Natalie and when he got the key from the front desk four hours earlier when he knew exactly what he was going to do to unsuspecting Sephanie Flores.

There is no tension, or upset or nervous reaction in his gait as he leaves the hotel. His strike is calm and relaxed and not hurried, In fact His He looks like he was going for a stroll without a care in the world, carrying a bag and a backpack.

JORAN’S EXCITEMENT KICKS IN WHEN ON THE RUN

But he taxi drivers to whom Joran paid $640 to transport him from Lima to Vinya de Mar Chile where he was apprehended, reported that they noticed that their passenger showed signals of nervousness.

No doubt Joran moved around and squirmed a lot in the back of the cab as he was reported to continuously chain smoke.

Even though they interpreted his behavior as nervous the truth was that Joran was no doubt more excited than nervous and all the extraneous movement the cab drivers observed was the result of his autonomic system taking over.

Joran was excited that he was on his way to getting away with yet another murder to satisfy his sick appetite.

JORAN ACTUALLY BELIEVED HE COULD GET AWAY WITH MURDER

Joran’s narcissism and eccentricity allowed him to assume that he would get away with murder. He was so sure that he would not get caught that didn’t even do anything to hide the brutally beaten body complete with the neck he snapped and broke. He didn’t even take the time to check out of the hotel. He just went on his merry way.

Why should he think of the consequences? Five years earlier, to the day, he got away with the murder of another young beautiful girl, Even though he was arrested repeatedly, he beat the system.

NO DADDY TO PROTECT AND ENABLE JORAN

His father Paulus also had his back at the time enabling him in his sickness. But now that daddy , who suddenly died of a heart attack four months earlier is gone, Joran has no one to cover for him or to tell him that he is loved unconditionally.

Perhaps Joran’s going out of his way to kill again had something to do with the recent death of his father. Since he cannot mourn his father’s death because has no feelings, he wants to feel something.

So he kills again to feel something, he kills to feel the excitement and the adrenalin rush he no doubt felt when he killed Natalie Hollyway.

PARADED AROUND TO REPORTERS

Three times, Joran wearing a green bullet proof vest, was paraded around to hundreds of people, including reporters.

No doubt authorities wanted everyone to get a glimpse of this real live monster who killed a lovely innocent woman who did not deserve such a horrific fate.

JORAN DENIES KILLING STEPHANIE FLORES

So now that daddy isn’t there to protect him, 22 year old Joran is reaching out to mommy as told authorities to call his mother in Aruba. My heart does go out to his mother whom I am sure had no idea that she spawned a monster.

JORAN DENIES DENIES AND DENIES SOME MORE

Of course Joran denied any involvement in Stephanie’s death. Little does he know about the surveillance cameras. The fact that he didn’t check out yet left with his bags and belongings, and took a cab to Chile instead of to the airport and flying directly to Argentina and his cropped short dyed red hair at attempts to disguise himself, does not bode well for him.

Even one of the best defense lawyers Joe Tacaopina won’t be able to help him. Tacopina was heard on television shows saying how it is easy to blame Joran because he has a bullseye on his back from the Holloway incident. But no one will be able to defend Joran this time- especially in Peru.

JORAN’S NEW HOME FOR THE REST OF HIS PATHETIC LIFE

A Peruvian prison is not anyplace anyone would want to be, especially when they are only given on e blanket in the freezing cold of the Andes Mountains. Since Peru does not have the death sentence, the rest of Joran’s life will be a living hell.

Just ask former American college student Lori Berenson who was accused of political activism in Peru. She spent 15 of the best years of her life in this hell and she didn’t even kill anyone.

So one can only imagine what will happen to Joran when he is locked up. The fact that he killed the daughter of a beloved national hero- a Peruvian race car driver and Presidential candidate won’t sit well with prison guards and other prisoners. Neither will the fact that he is an outsider and a foreigner.

And let’s say he does get 30 years and is released when he is in his 50’s, no doubt he will be extradited to the US where he will face extortion charges in Alabama and spend the remainder of his life in a US prison. He tried to extort $250,000 from an associate of the Holloway family in exchange for revealing the whereabouts of Natalie.

One of Joran’s buddies who was interviewed said he had a gambling and drug addiction. That is no doubt because those are the only times his adrenalin kicks in and he can feel anything. He also apparently has a killing young innocent women addiction which thankfully has come to an end. Now both Natalie and Stephanie can rest in peace! wwdrlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: body language analyusis, body language expert, body languiage analysis, Dr. Lillin Glass, egocentic, Joran Van de Sloot, Joran Van der sloot's father, Joran van der Sloot's mother, Joran Van der Sloot;s Body Language, lillian glass, narcicissm, Natalie Holloway, Paulus Van der Sloot, Peruvian prison, psychology, psychopth, Ricardo Fores Vasques, serial killer, sociopath, Vander sloot caught in oeru
Posted in Criminal, body language | 4 Comments »

Jesse James Body Language Shows He Was Lying About His Racism. His Voice and Speech Indicates He’s Detached From Little Louis

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

NO SPARKLE IN JESSE’S EYES OR VOICE WHEN DISCUSSING BABY LOUIE

When a person really adores someone, whether it is a love interest or a baby, their eyes literally light up. It actually looks there is a spark in the person’s eye because physiologically their pupils are dilating, so their eyes suddenly change. This subtle and immediate change makes their eyes look bigger and brighter This bright eyed look was completely lacking with Jesse when she spoke of baby Louie.

In fact when Jesse spoke of Baby Louie, he looked away as a form of detachment when discussing Baby Louie.

When the interviewer asked if there was any reason he and Sandra decided to adopt a black baby, in a dull ,matter of fact, unemotional expressionless tone, with a shoulder shrug, he replied “ I don’t care what color the baby is”. The shrug gave it all away. So did his looking away. He looked up and away as though he were attempting to come up with the right politically correct sounding statement.

Of course he cared what color the baby was!.

If he really didn’t care what color the baby was, his demeanor would have been a lot different. He would have faced the interviewer directly (who happened to be black) and looked right into her eyes as he told her this. His looking away indicated a non- truth tell. His body language showed that he was clearly uncomfortable with the thought baby Louie being a black baby.

LOUIE’S FUTURE WITH A RACIST DAD

Jesse says he is doing the interview because he is mainly concerned about the racism perception. But when he looks away he isn’t very convincing. There does not appear to be sincerity in his facial expression or in his tone of voice.

When a person allegedly grows up spouting off the N world as his step mom reported to RadarOnline and has done that since childhood, no doubt their racial views are deep rooted.

Because of that , it would no doubt be difficult for these racially charged feelings to not surface. This would no doubt be a huge emotional adjustment for Jesse to wrap his mind around the thought of having a black son.

On his next breath he says in a dull rehearsed monotone that his only prerequisite was that “ I want a baby that needs us the most.” As she says this we see a smug smile as though he is pleased with himself for giving he right politically correct answer.

Well here is a news flash Jesse- EVERY orphan needs a parent. EVERY baby needs someone to love them! And every parent NEEDS a baby to love. This statement concerned me because what if Louie grows up not “NEEDING,” What if Louie turns out to be is an independent type of little guy and Jesse views it as his being ungrateful. There could be huge conflict and major issue as the baby matures in my view.

WHERE IS THE LOOK OF SADNESS THAT LOUIE WILL NOT BE ON YOUR LIFE?

Then the interviewer asks Jesse, “How do you feel that the baby will have her name and not yours>”

Jesse once again looks away in trying to come up with the right answer.He then says with no hint of sadness in his face or in his vocal tone but rather in a flat monotone and mono face. “ It made me sad.” He certainly didn’t look too sad. Instead, he looked rather relieved.

His facial expression was in marked contrast from the facial expression seen above when he found his lost pit pull. He had more excitement and facial animation towards his dog than he did when speaking about his “”son.”

“HIM” HAS A NAME- LOUIE

When a person calls a new baby an “it” or a “them” or a “him” or a “her
and doesn’t refer to the baby by name, especially in the specific context where a name could be used, it means that the person is detaching and objectifying the baby.

It can also mean that bonding has not occurred. I have no doubt that this is the case with Jesse. It may seem like a picky thing but it speaks volumes.

Jesse no doubt hasn’t bonded with Louie or he would have called him by name. In contrast, Sandra called Louie by name when she spoke of him in her most recent interview.

In trying to describe how Sandra so readily took to mothering, he relayed “as soon as she picked “HIM up…” He didn’t call the baby by name and say as soon as she picked Louie up.”

WHAT WAS SANDRA THINKING??

After watching Jesse on the Apprentice play the game so passive aggressively, discovering his egregious Nazi like actions, and now hearing him speak, up I can’t help but wondering. what WAS Sandra thinking when she got involved with him?

He seems so limited and so different from the person she not only portrays on screen but from who she is. I k ow several people who know Sandra and they rave about her. So what happened?

I will tell you what happened and I will tell you even more about what happened when my new book comes out in Novemebver called TOXIC MEN- Identify, Deal With and Heal From Men Who Make Your Life Miserable (Adams Media).

Sandra is not alone; Like so many women, she got involved with a TOXIC MAN for a myriad of reasons.

Perhaps she saw who he was but felt that with a lot of love she could be the one to tame him and change him. This is a huge mistake that so many nurturing types of women make, to their detriment.
Perhaps she felt needy as her mother had passed and she wanted someone with whom she could bond a share a life.
Since Jesse had a ready made family, perhaps she thought she could easily involve herself and contribute a lot to his children.
Perhaps she got sexually turned on by his bad boy” image and persona.
Maybe was great in bed,
Perhaps she was sick of dating or being alone,
It is possible she wanted a man to complete the package of her image
It could be that she wanted someone to love and would do anything and put up with anything in order to make that happen.

And the list goes on and on. One of the things I share in my new book is ways people can learn the signals of dealing with a Toxic Person like Jesse James you jump in and get involved.

WHAT??? JESSE HAS TO LOOK AT THE PHOTOS OF HIM IN NAZI GEAR TO REALIZE THAT IT WAS A JOKE !!!!‘

The first thing Jesse says to the interviewer with regard to the photo of himn in the Nazi hat and salute is that he doesn’t remember taking that photo. As he says this his eyebrows are raised and he cocks his head to the side. This is a pleading facial language.

In essence he is pleading for the interviewer to ‘lease believe him. When someone is showing their head cocked to0 the side and their eyebrows are raaised they are really saying that they know that they won’t be believed, They know that the person won;t buy what they are saying so they are in essence pleasing that they will buy it via their facial expression.

Unless he was drunk or high out of his mind or has Alzheimer’s, of course he remembers taking the photo. Wearing a Nazi had and doing a Nazi salute is a memorable event. If he doesn’t remember taking the photo, perhaps it is a commonplace event in his life, perhaps he made that salute all the time and wore the hat around the house all the time so he may not have remembered that a photo was taken of him doing what he always did.

Then with open eyes and looking directly ate the interviewer, he has the audacity to say that he could tell by looking at the photo that it was a joke.

The more Jesse spoke the more disgusted I became with him. I don’t care what anyone says, the fact that a person would don a Nazi uniform and give a salute and actually think it was a joke shows what a disturbed person he is .

There is absolutely NOTHING funny about wearing a Nazi hat and emulating a Nazi leader who caused havoc on our world six decades ago. The repercussions of Hitler’s actions still exist to say and it is NOT a laughing matter by any means.

It would be the same thing as someone putting on black face makeup and putting a noose around their neck. That would be the biggest insult to any African American who suffered this horrible during one of the ugliest times of our history when blacks were slaves andf were lynched for no reason at all.

Lamely, Jesse says “it was funny for a minute, but now looking at the context in my life now its not funny.”

All of this was said in a boring nasly monotone which make you wonder how Sandra could have listened to his irritating voice for all these years.

When someone uses the word funny in the same sentence as Nazi there is something seriously wrong with them in my view.

FURTHER OBJECTIFING LITTLE LOUIS BY CALLING HIM “THAT BABY”

As he talks about Sandra and Louie he continues to depersonalize Louie by saying : “As soon as she put THAT BABY on her hands it was automatic and amazing” The fact that he didn’t call little Louie by name speaks volumes to me.

Louie is NOT “THAT BABY ”, He is a person with his own identity and his own name. If Jesse looked at him as a an actually person he would have called Louie by his name.

Then with regard to Sandra Bullock he further added “ I found a new trust for her, like I knew she wasn’t going to leave, and our relationship blossomed.”

WHATT??? What does that mean” Does that mean that she was planning to leave him at one time?

SHOWING NO SADNESS WHEN TALKING ABOUT BEING SAD ABOUT BEING CALLED A RACIST.

The one thing that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way was the fact that Jesse showed no remorse. Even though he said he was sad, he showed no signs of sadness in his expression as he spoke these words:

“There’s not a racist bone in my body.” I think out of everything, this is why I’m doing this interview the most, because you know, dealing with losing my marriage and my son and embarrassing everyone and decimating my life, but to be called a racist on top of that is, it makes me really sad.”

When people’s emotions are incongruous with their words it disturbs people. It is what a lot of sociopaths do. They speak the right words yet they show no signs of emotion to go along with those words. His vocal t9nes do sound like those whoa re sociopaths. It makes me wonder if Jesse is indeed a sociopath.

His stepmother said in an interview that he liked to kill small baby animals. If that is the case he scares me to death. All I can say is thank GOD little Louie does not have Jesse’s last name and Jesse will not be raising him.

I hope and pray that Sandra never allows Jess back into her life. But I am sure that she will allow Jesse back in some capacity the sake of Jesse’s little daughter Sunny and his older son.

That would be a huge mistake to let Jesse back into her life as her significant other or her love interest, not only for her sake but for Louie’s sake .

Jesse’s body language screamed racism and if that is the case what is to say that he may very well take out his inner hatred towards minorities like Jews and Black’s on innocent black baby Louie.

It may not come out directly and it may not come out for a while . In fact, because of all of the exposure, Jesse may very well be on his very best behavior around Louie. But eventually your true feelings about Blacks will most probably surface . It may may manifest in his tone of voice , in what he says and how he acts towards Louie. as Louie gets older.

I preay that Sandra allows this child to have nothng whatsoever to do with Jesse . If what Jesse’s step mother said is true and he said the N world frequently without batting an eye as a child and if he harmed and killed baby animals like his step mother alleges m then he is a seriously disturbed and sadistic person who in my view should not only be shunned by Sandra but by everyone else.

ENJOYING BEING THE MOST HATED MAN IN THE WORLD

In the photo above Jesse shows a very genuine smile complete with raised cheeks, lips apart and teeth showing. This expression was seen right after he corrected the interviewer that he was not the most hated man in America, but rather the most hatred man in the world.

Based on his facial expression he seemed rather pleased with that title as he continued to smirk.

But Jesse may be the only one who is please with his new title. Most people are not pleased as no one can ever embrace a person who is racist, a liar, a person who shows no remorse, and a baby animal killer if what his stepmother says is true. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: baby louie bullock, body language, body language analysis, communication, Deal With And Heal From Men WHo Make Your Life Miserable, dr. lillian glass, Identify, Jesse Jame;s Nazi, Jesse James, Jesse James racist, lillian glass, Louis Bullock, mbody langiuage expert, Media Psychologist, most hated man in the world, Nazi, Nazi hat, Nazi salute, Nightline interview, noose, psychologist, psychology, racuism, Sandra Bullock, slaverly, Toxic Men, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Celebrities, body language | No Comments »

Lindsay Lohan’s Lying Body Language to In Hollywood.com Interview Shows Defensiveness and Anger

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

As a body language expert being able to read between the lines can be very upsetting when you see someone who was once so gorgeous and talented headed for destruction. Lindsay Lohan’s one on one interview with Hollywood.com was very sad and disturbing to me.

As Lindsay answered the very blunt and direct questions posed to her, there was nothing about it that rang true except for one part.

That was the part when she spoke about how negatively she feels about her father and how she can’t stand him. She called him a convicted felon and said with regard to her father that “enough is enough.”

You can see this in the above photo. That was the only time that her body language showed that she was direct. She faced forward and leaned out and looked directly at the interviewer.

Her facial expression was congruent with what she said. She looked pained and angry based on the tension in her lips and jaw area and on her forehead.

It makes one wonder whether father Michael Lohan’s negative actions stimulate Lindsay’s very disturbing and destructive behavior.

If she does have an alleged alcohol and or drug problem, is his going to the press and sharing her private conversations adding to her aberrant behaviors?

What rings very true is when she says she has nothing to do with him.

LINDSAY’S “ TELLS” WHICH INDICATE LYING

The rest of her interview was filled with signals of deception, which indicated that she was lying about almost every one of the issues about which she was questioned.

Here were the lying “tells” which were observed throughout the interview :

1. Shoulder shrugging

2. Pulling back

3. Looking down and away from the interviewer

4. Looking up to indicate that she was manufacturing answers to the questions

5. Excessive eye blinking

6. Repetition of words and phrases

7. Repeating the question at the beginning of the sentence

8. Using “uh” um’s a lot

9. Telling way too much information

10. Going off on tangents

11. Making countless excuses for actions and behaviors

12. Pulling the head and body back

13. Squirming in her seat

BODY LANGUAGE ANALYSIS IS DEFINITELY NOT “PSEUDOSCIENCE” OR “JUNK SCIENCE” . INSTEAD IT IS BOTH AN ART AND A SCIENCE

And for those of you who are:

a. contentious,

b. die hard Lindsay Lohan fans who can see nothing wrong with her behavior, or

c. who just plain like to argue, please take your fight somewhere else . ‘

Don’t waste your time or mine or show your lack of knowledge by telling me that body language analysis is a pseudoscience or junk science.

I can assure you that it is not. It is based on science and behavioral analysis.

Look at the work of one of the greatest body language researchers of our time, Dr. Paul Ekman, of Stanford University. who’s work on facial tells and micromovement analysis is showcased in the Fox hit television show “ Lie to Me.”

While body language analysis is based on scientific evidence , there is also an art to it. It takes a long time to learn it and an even longer time to be really good at it.

I liken it to what a surgeon does. Based on his education, knowledge and experience, the surgeon, knows exactly what to do during an operation. But the success of the operation depends on his skill as a surgeon and how well he uses and manipulates his hands. In that respect, it is an art.

The same holds true in body language analysis. Anyone that tells you differently that it is a junk science or that it is a pseudoscience is completely ignorant and/ or has a personal axe to grind like a certain self proclaimed Tourette syndrome psychologist named Leslie E. Packer PhD who writes the blog called pogowasright and “ Chronicles of Dissent” with the operative word being on her moniker “dissent.”

DR.LILLIAN GLASS HAS NEVER BACKPEDDLED, AS ” PSYCHOLOGIST” LESLIE E. PACKER AUTHOR OF “CHRONICLES OF DISSENT” AND POGOWASRIGHT, ERRONOUSLY STATES.

I first encountered this psychologist, Leslie E. Packer Ph.D , author of the blog “Chronicles of Dissent” and pogowasright , after I read a very nasty and defamatory blog where she wrote an internet headline that I backpeddled in relation to my series of blogs about Britney Spears . Britney if you remember, had had some issues at the time.

I wondered who would anonymously write such untrue and defamatory comments about me, be such a hater towards other media psychologists, in show cowardly behavior by not signing their name, and even go as far as admitting she wrote to the Board of Psychology (who by the way ended up ignoring her hostile efforts).

This blogger continued her personal vendetta by attacking my work as a body language expert, thumbing her nose at it and calling it junk and pseudoscience.

But what she didn’t count on was how I ironically used my scientific skills as a body language expert to uncover this formerly anonymous blogger’s identity. In doing so it completely refuted her ignorant claims that body language analysis is junk or pseudoscience.

DR. LILLIAN GLASS’ BODY LANGUAGE ANALYSIS WAS USED TO UNCOVER THE IDENTITY OF ANONYMOUS BLOGGER, TOURETTE SYNDROME PSYCHOLOGIST LESLIE E. PACKER. AUTHOR OF BLOG CHRONICLES OF DISSENT AND POGOWASRIGHT

After analyzing various “tells” in her blog writings, I discovered that all of this Toxic verbal venom towards me and my profession came from a 70 something New York based psychologist ( a non- media psychologist) who in my view had a definite axe to grind.

In fact, to me it seemed like nothing else but a clear case of professional jealousy. Based on my analysis of her specific “tells” I discovered her name was Leslie E Packer a PhD who reportedly dealt with patients with Tourette’s Syndrome . She was also the author of a blog called Chronicles of Dissent” and pogowasright. When I punched up her name on the internet it appeared that she was no stranger to her activity as there were numerous allegedly derogatory headlines over the internet which several others made about her.

So, the bottom line is that anyone who calls body language analysis a pseudoscience or junk science is to be ignored.

They may allegedly have “issues” or a personal axe to grind.

WHAT LINDSAY REALLY SAID

ANGER. DENIAL AND DEFIANCE

When Lindsay was asked point blank whether she should be in rehab , the most telling signal was that she looked away, In a defensive facial move, she slightly wrinkled her forehead as she lifted her shoulder (as in giving the cold shoulder)

In an angry clipped staccato tone stated “ I don’t see why I have to go.” Her answer clearly indicated that she was in denial. She was angry at the question and even more angry at the notion that someone would think of sending her to rehab .

As she looks away her face reflects her defiance as she continues on making lame excuses.

SIGNALS OF DECEPTION AND VULNERABILITY WHEN DISCUSSING “MISSING” PASSPORT

When someone repeats the question you asked and manipulates one of your key words, chances are they a re not telling you the truth.

The interviewer bluntly asks Did your passport really go missing or was it an excuse.?”

Immediately you notice a shoulder shrugs she repeats the same sentence. These are two definite signals of deception.

Then she continues , as she touches her neck. “ and says “ other thing a piece of jewelery and items that were in my possession, so I thought.”

The volunteering of that much information which was not requested, along with her shoulder shrug were two more signals of deception, making it a total of four signals in just a sentence .

When Lindsay denied that her passport didn’t go missing but rather was stolen, this change in semantics shows that she has definite problems with getting things straight. She had no proof the passport was stolen.

In the photo above you can clearly see that notice that Lindsey holding onto her neck and chin. The neck is one of the the most vulnerable parts of our body

So when someone holds onto it it usually reflects that they are indeed feeling vulnerable. Lindsay may very well have felt vulnerable after being asked this question which she most probably knew was not true.

Finally her shifting her eyes to the side as soon as she was asked the question is further indication of deception.

WAY TOO MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT MISSING PROGRAMS’

When someone gives you too much information and makes excuses and gets into excess detail, they are usually not telling you the truth.

Lindsay is full of justifying her behavior and that is a huge signal of deception.

LYING ABOUT TAKING DRUGS

When Lindsay was asked if she was still taking drugs the telling signal of deception was a shoulder shrug and her looking away as though she didn’t want to face the truth. The muscle tension in her forehead indicating that she as angry she was asked this question. d

Her cocking her head to the side and looking own to the side indicates that she is attempting to manufacture an answer.

DEFENSIVENESS

Perhaps the most telling thing throughout the interview was Lindsay’s defensiveness,. This was really evident when she was asked about missing her programs.

Instead of a simple yes or no answer as to whether she attended all of her programs she looks worried and terrified and is full of excuses about how she stayed in NY and did another class and something about a funeral.

THE INDIAN EMBASSY ???

When people lie their excuses often get more and more creative. They make no sense whatsoever min terms of their decision making process.

When Lindsay said she tried everything to get back to LA for her court date she said she even went to the Indian embassy.

This makes no sense at all. An American has no business going to an Indian embassy. They can only help their Indian citizens not American ones.

ANGRY CHIN JUT WHEN ASKED ABOUT HER PARTYING IN CANNES

In this photo above we really see a very angry Lindsay Lohan who looks very defiant as she juts her chin forward and glares at the interviewer who asked her about her partying in Cannes. She completely denied it stating that she was working.

She was extremely defensive body language wise with a raised shoulder indicting that she was ready for a fight. It;s much like an aggressive animal does with raised hackles when they are ready to attack.

The odd thing was that the movie that she was allegedly promoting a movie on which she says she was working hasn’t even been made. So in essence she was there to promote an idea for a movie that has no production date

LINDSAY AND HER NEW ADDITON – A SCRAM BRACELET

The whole thing is so sad. It was so sad to see Lindsay looking so devastated in the courtroom as she was sentenced to wear a SCRAM bracelet to determine if she would be free of alcohol in her system.

She was then told that she would be subject to random drug testing. I certainly hope that Lindsay can accomplish these two things. I hope that she will not drink or take drugs. I hope that if she is addicted to either of these substances that she take advantage of this situation to get herself sorted out in a 12 step program or get herself to an addiction specialist who can help her. Rehab may also be a good choice for her. Even though she failed at it in the past, she just may succeed this time around. Oftentimes it may take many stints in rehab to get clean of drugs and alcohol.

FAMILY DYNAMICS

I pray for Lindsay. I would love to see her succeed and become an inspiration to others. I know that this talented and beautiful young woman has suffered a lot of emotional distress due to her relationship with her TOXIC father.

Instead of taking it out on herself and self destructing, she needs to get some professional help so that she can turn her pain outward and not inward.

DAD

Personally, I believe that the damage between Lindsay and her father is irreparable. When he shared her personal audiotapes with the world and allegedly received payment for doing so I believe that was the ultimate betrayal. There are some things which are unforgivable and in my view that is one of them.

I believe that she needs to continue to unplug from her father and continue to keep him at arms length from her. He does not need to be in her life. I believe that there are some people who are so TOXIC to others that they can wreak havoc on their psyche and restimulate self destructive behaviors.

MOM

While Dina her mother is clearly an enabler based on her actions and denial of Lindsay’s issues, there is no doubt that Lindsay loves her mother. You can see her love for her mother when she talked about her mother in the Hollywood.com interview.

You could even see the affection the two have for one another in the latest ET interview where Lindsay surprised her mother with having her mother’s house cleaned by a professional organizer. I think that their relationship could be a lot healthier if they both had some joint counseling together and Dina learned about boundaries and not enabling her daughter.

SIBLINGS

There is also a lot of affection between Lindsay and her siblings. In fact she became teary eyed when she talked about not being able to attend her younger brother’s graduation because she was going to be in court .

I believe that Lindsay can turn this negative experience into a positive one and use the time to get herself sorted out.

I hope that she gets counseling to help her deal with the pain that appears to be gnawing inside of her. Nothing would be more inspiring than to see a positive comeback for this beautiful and gifted actress. www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: blog, body language, body language analysis, body language expert, body language tells, bosy language analysis techniques to discover identity of anonymous blogger, Britney Spears, Chronicles of Dissent, communicaiton specialist, communication expert, counseling, Dina Lohan, Dr, Dr. Leslie E. Packer, dr. lillian glass, Dr. Lillian Glass backpeddles, Dr. Paul Eckman, Dr. Phil, Glass v Packer, hOLLYWOODTV.COM, Indian Embassy, junk science, Leslie E. Packer, Leslie E. Packer PhD. pogpowasright, Leslie E. Packer Tourette Psychologist, Leslie Packer, liars, Lie to Me, lies, lillian glass, Lindsay Lohan, Lindsay Lohan in Cannes, Lindsay Lohan in court, Lindsay Lohand drugs and alcohol, lying, Media Psychologist, Media Psychologists, Michael Lohan, Paul Ekman, pseudoscience, psychologist, psychology, SCRAM bracelet, signals of deception, Tourette's psychologist, Toxic People, www, www.drlillianglass.com, www.Hollywoodlife.com, www.pogowasright.com
Posted in Actresses, Celebrities, Criminal, body language | 2 Comments »

Tommy Croslin’s Voice and Speech Patterns in Jailhouse Confession Ring True. What Does Ron Cummings Know?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

TOMMY’S NON DECEPTIVE VOCAL TELLS

Tommy Croslin, brother of Misty Croslin, the ex step mother of missing five year old Haleigh Cummings, told his grandmother, Flora Hollars that he knows how Haleigh died. Based on his vocal tells during his phone conversation with his grandmother he appears to me to be telling the truth.

He is fluent in speech, without hesitation, repetition, and does’t use ” like um and ums” – tells which can often be heard when there is deception. He has a fluidity to the rate of speech. His tone of voice is appropriately inflected, especially when he speaks about being scared. He says that he is scared of anyone hurting his kids and I believe him. In fact, n you can actually hear the fearful emotional state reflected in his vocal tone.

I especially believe Tommy when he tells his grandmother that he was threatened to keep quiet about what happened. Perhaps that would seem to explain the headless rat that arrived in his mailbox, which Ron allegedly sent as a reminder to not “rat him out”.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO HALEIGH?

Grandmother Flora Hollars questioned her grandson Tommy about that horribly fateful night that Haleigh was last seen. She said:

“I was told that Ron come home, and Haleigh and found one of his pills and took it and was dead … Ron called you to get you to come up there and help Misty clean the house while he disposed of Haleigh,”

But then Tommy denied this scenario which his grandmother presented and said it simply wasn’t true.

He said he was threatened to stay quiet about what happened, or risk being killed. He told his grandmother he feels more safe in jail.

Tommy then asked his grandmother about his sister Misty and if she has told investigators all she knows about Haleigh.

This line of Tommy’s questioning definitely leads me to believe what I have said all along that Misty knows a lot about what happened to the little girl.

I read it in her vocal pattern during the 911 call and saw it in her body language on every subsequent television interview she did where she discussed how she didn’t know what happened to little Haleigh.

DID HALEIGH OVERDOSE ON OXYCONTIN?

Even though Tommy denied Flora’s scenario that she heard Haleigh and found one of his pills and took it and was dead …and even denied the rest of her scenario that “ Ron called you to get you to come up there and help Misty clean the house while he disposed of Haleigh,” the real question is, what part of the scenario is Tommy denying? Is there any part of the scenario which is true? Is he denying the part that:

Haleigh found one of his pills and took it and was dead, or that
Ron called him to come up there and help Misty clean the house, or that
Ron disposed of Haleigh?

Was Tommy saying “no” to all of this story or only to a part of it?

This is not the first time we heard something about Haleigh in relation to drugs. It was one of the three stories that Flora said that Misty shared with her grandmother as to what happened to Haleigh.

It was also a scenario that we read about in one of Misty Croslin’s friend’s jailhouse letters. Apparently her friend Kristina Prevatt aka Nay Nay made reference to Haleigh getting into some “oxycottin.”

If it was true that Haleigh got a hold of the drug and ingested it, did she first become unconscious before she died? As soon as she was unconscious why wasn’t she immediately taken to the emergency room where her stomach could have been pumped and her life could have possibly been saved ?

The reason may have been simple. If it was discovered that she ingested oxycontin, authorities question would be where she got the drug. There would be no doubt be an investigation and Ron’s drug dealing business would be over. So nothing was done to save her, if indeed she did ingest the drug. If this is the case, she was obviously neglected and left to die.

Could this be the reason that Ron acted so odd throughout this entire situation? Did he know what happened to Haleigh as he had Misty call 911 and as he subsequently went on television to do all of the interviews?

RON’S ODD BODY LANGUAGE AND BEHAVIOR SINCE THE 911 CALL

I have always been troubled by Ronald Cummings’ body language and behavior ever since I first heard the 911 tape where he had his then 17 year old girlfriend Misty reported his daughter Haleigh missing.

To me, his behavior seemed very confusing and not congruent. Did he know a lot more than he was saying during his interviews? In my view, his behavior was very odd. Here are the elements which have troubled me about Ron’s behavior.

The 911 call was made by a 17 year old girl and not by Ron, the parent of the child. As we all saw in the Greta van Sustern interviews, Ron is a “ take charge kind of guy” as he appeared to direct Misty as to what to say and not to say. So why didn’t he take charge that night and call 911?

In the brief moment he speaks to the 911 operator, Ron said ” I just got home from work. If I find who took my daughter I will kill them. He then repeats this threat several times, which is very odd. Most people who were missing a child would go into the woods, even in the dark and start to call out to the child. They would wonder why she would have walked off.They would plead with 911 to help them locate their child. They would not make threats.

3. During the 911 call he told Misty to hang up because he had” better people to talk to.” Who were these “better” people to whom he was referring that were more important to speak to other than law enforcement?

4. His sudden rush to marry a legally underage 17 year old shortly after the child disappeared was also cause for concern. Was his rush to marry Misty done so that his wife could not testify against him? Did he marry her so quickly because he did not want to get arrested for being with an underage girl?

5. His controlling behavior over Misty during the Greta van Sustern interview and Today show interview and inconsistent statements make one wonder whether he already knew what happened to his daughter. Why was he so controlling over Misty in her speaking? Did he not want her to reveal something relevant to the press?

6. Ron’s hurling himself on the ground for what seemed to be for the effect of the camera and his non tears were also odd.

7. Ron was too sure that Haleigh was taken and still alive. After a year, most people would at least question whether Haleigh had been killed.

8.Ron’s constant verbal theme that he was “at work,” said throughout all of his interviews was odd. It was as though he mentioned it to everyone who would listen so they would be sure to know he had nothing to do with Haleigh’s disappearance because he was somewhere else- “at work”.

While it was documented that Ron was indeed at work, what happened before he went to work? During one interview, he had a smug Chesire cat grin, when he spoke about how he was”at work.”

He even made the same statement to the undercover officer to whom he sold the drugs in the car as he also told him that he was “at work”.

9.Ron’s volunteering too much unsolicited information that “Haleigh was not a victim of a dope boy”- a young male that moves hard drugs (ex. cocaine, crack), as well as the standard marijuana and prescription pills to a specific geographic area or neighborhood, was also odd.

10. His deceptive verbal tells of hesitation, fragmentation, and the repetition to Geraldo Rivera’s interview were also concerns.

11. Ron made a disconcerting statement to Geraldo when Geraldo tells him he was told that Ron hit his child. Ron’s answer was fragmented as he repeated Gerlado’s exact words in the beginning of the question .Ron then goes on to say “ Me and my child have an agreement. Daddy, daughter. She has been spanked on her behind the way DCF says that you can take care of disciplining your children.”

First of all what is this daddy daughter agreement? This fragmented statement with way too much information leads me to question as to whether Ron may have possibly hit Haleigh or possibly backhanded her to the face as Geraldo asked.

12. Ron lied to Geraldo about having nothing to do with drugs when in fact we know that he did, based on his recent drug bust.

13. Finally, Ron’s bravado when he was first arrested, telling reporter Dan Treen that he will kill the person who killed Haleigh makes me once again question if this was his way to possibly mislead authorities who so they would take the focus of of him.

DID MISTY HARM HALEIGH?

One of the other possible scenarios that Flora Hollars said that Misty relayed to her in relation to what happened to Haleigh was that she hit Haleigh over the head with some wood.

The inconsistencies with regard to Misty during her interviews since Haleigh went missing are a follows:

Misty told Greta Van Sustern she did not sleep with Haleigh.
Misty told Nancy Grace that Hailey was not in bed with her, indicating they had not slept together.
Misty then said at one time Hailey was asleep in the same bed with her brother.
Misty said she was washing the sheets and put a blanket over Haleigh when she was sleeping
Misty told Meredith Viera that Haleigh was in her bed
Misty told Nancy Grace that she and Haleigh were in bed together.
Misty also said she went to bed at 10 PM and woke up at 3. Ron said he called Misty at 3:25 as he was pulling into the driveway.I want to know what happened in those 25 minutes when Misty reported that she woke up to the time Ron called her as he pulled into the driveway. And why would anyone call anyone as they were pulling into the driveway when they would see the person in a matter of seconds? It didn’t make any sense at all.

TOMMY IS THE FIRST

During one interview where I was on a panel with Leonard Padilla, the famous bounty hunter, he said that”:Tommy would be the first to crack.” He said that Tommy would be the first one to tell what happened and Leonard was absolutely correct.

Tommy is frightened to losing his wife Lindsey and his family and keeps mentioning this. In fact in his last conversation with Tommy, grandmother Flora Hollars reassured Tommy that Lindsey loved him and wasn’t leaving him.

So it seems to me as though Tommy is highly motivated to get back to the wife and family he loves. No doubt that is why he has decided that it is in his best interest to tell the truth and to tell all that he knows and , finally cooperate.

www.drlillianglass.com

Share on Facebook

Tags: body language expert, body languyage, bounty hunter, communication expert, Dan Treen, deception, dope boy, dr. lillian glass, Flora Hollars, Geraldo Rivera, Greta Van Sustern, Haleigh Cummings, Kristina Prevett, Leonard Padilla, lillian glass, lying, Meredith Viera, Misty Croslin, Nancy Grace, Nay Nay, ody language analysius, psychology, Ron Cummings, speech tells, Tommy Croslin, truth, vocsal tellsm, www.drlillianglass, www.drlillianglass.com
Posted in Criminal, body language | No Comments »